Cited by 40Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

The Adverse Effects of Meditation-Interventions and Mind–Body Practices: a Systematic Review

Taylor, Greenberry B., Vasquez, Taylor S., Kastrinos, Amanda, Fisher, Carla L., Puig, Ana, Bylund, Carma L.·2022·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-022-01915-6

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor, G. B., Vasquez, T. S., Kastrinos, A., Fisher, C. L., Puig, A., & Bylund, C. L.
Affiliations
  • Flagler College (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Greenberry B.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2022-06-06
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
1839-1856
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W4281615629
Cited by
40
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
meditation intervention, mind-body practices, adverse effects, psychological distress, anxiety, somatic distress, sleep disorders, face-to-face intervention, meditation apps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review