Cited by 280Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentPediatric Pain Management Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Correlates of improvement in multidisciplinary treatment of chronic pain.

Jensen, Mark P., Turner, Judith A., Romano, Joan M.·1994·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Although multidisciplinary pain programs have been demonstrated to be effective, the processes of improvement have yet to be clarified. Cognitive-behavioral models posit that improvement is due, in part, to changes in patient pain beliefs and coping strategies. To test the relationships between treatment outcome and changes in beliefs and coping strategies, 94 chronic pain patients completed measures of physical and psychological functioning, health care utilization, pain beliefs, and use of pain coping strategies at admission and 3 to 6 months after inpatient pain treatment. Improved functioning and decreased health care use were associated with changes in both beliefs and cognitive coping strategies. However, changes in some coping strategies, such as exercise and use of rest, were not associated with improvement.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.62.1.172

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jensen, M. P., Turner, J. A., & Romano, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1994
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
172-179
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2088452061
Cited by
280
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5f32ns008545-02)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F32 NS08545)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
chronic pain, multidisciplinary pain management, pain beliefs, pain coping, cognitive-behavioral model, treatment outcomes, health care utilization, physical function, psychological functioning, physical activity, rest
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Chronic Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Rest, Exercise, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review