Cited by 984Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Therapy for youths with anxiety disorders: A second randomized clincal trial.

Kendall, Philip C., Flannery-Schroeder, Ellen, Panichelli-Mindel, Susan M., Southam-Gerow, Michael, Henin, Aude, Warman, Melissa·1997·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Ninety-four children (aged 9-13 years) with anxiety disorders were randomly assigned to cognitive behavioral treatment or waiting-list control. Outcomes were evaluated using diagnostic status, child self-reports, parent and teacher reports, cognitive assessment and behavioral observation: maintenance was examined using 1-year follow-up data. Analyses of dependent measures indicated significant improvements over time, with the majority indicating greater gains for those receiving treatment. Treatment gains returned cases to within nondeviant limits (i.e., normative comparisons) and were maintained at 1-year follow-up. Client age and comorbid status did not moderate outcomes. A preliminary examination of treatment segments suggested that the enactive exposure (when it follows cognitive-educational training) was an active force in beneficial change. Discussion includes suggestions for future research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.65.3.366

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 76 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 983

Metadata

Authors
Kendall, P. C., Flannery-Schroeder, E., Panichelli-Mindel, S. M., Southam-Gerow, M., Henin, A., & Warman, M.
Affiliations
Temple University (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1997
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
366-380
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2162075090
Cited by
984
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 46
FWCI
37.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - PCOM (Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh044042-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 44042)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
anxiety disorders, children, adolescents, cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment outcomes, maintenance therapy, comorbidities, age effects, waitlist control
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review