Cited by 195Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Introduction to the special section on suicide and nonsuicidal self-injury: A review of unique challenges and important directions for self-injury science.

Prinstein, Mitchell J.·2008·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Self-injurious behaviors, including nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicidal behaviors, are remarkably prevalent and woefully understudied. This area of research involves numerous methodological, ethical, and practical challenges that have limited progress in understanding some of the most basic characteristics and correlates of self-injurious behavior. To date, relatively little data are available to develop empirically based preventions or interventions, and no empirically supported treatments currently are available to reduce NSSI or suicidality in most populations. The articles in this special section offer examples of methodologically innovative, theoretically based work that address these research needs. Articles in this special section include studies of functional models of NSSI, studies that examine more distal risk factors for NSSI, and studies of suicidality. A brief review of current research in these areas is offered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.76.1.1

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another explanation for the relatively low number of empirical advances in understanding suicide may be the absence of a theory that comprehensively explains known facts and reliably identifies future risk.

    “Thus, another explanation for the relatively low number of empirical advances in understanding the causes and correlates of suicide, as well as methods for suicide prevention, may therefore be the absence of a theory that can comprehensively explain known facts about suicide, as well as reliably and precisely identify risk for future occurrences of suicidal behavior.”

    From The interpersonal theory of suicide. (2010) · cites this paper as Prinstein, 2008

  • Available theories mostly do not address both intra-individual and inter-individual factors.

    “In addition, as noted by Prinstein (2008), available theories do not, for the most part, address both intra-individual and inter-individual factors.”

    From The interpersonal theory of suicide. (2010) · cites this paper as Prinstein (2008)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prinstein, M. J.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Prinstein, Mitchell J.
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2008
Volume
76
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2021947251
Cited by
195
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
non-suicidal self-injury, suicide, self-harm, suicidality
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Cross-Sectional Studies, Ethics, Medical, Humans, Risk Factors, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, Self-Injurious Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review