Cited by 601Behavioral Health and InterventionsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Rethinking the Role of Positive Affect in Self-Regulation

Aspinwall, Lisa G.·1998·Motivation and Emotion

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1023080224401

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 107 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aspinwall, L. G.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Aspinwall, Lisa G.
Venue
Motivation and Emotion
Published
1998-03
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
1-32
ISSN
  • 0146-7239 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6644
OpenAlex
W1724628074
Cited by
601
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 31
FWCI
20.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Motivation and Emotion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
positive affect, positive mood, self-regulation, task context

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review