Cited by 76Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyCognitive Functions and Memory

Preparing for what might happen: An episodic specificity induction impacts the generation of alternative future events

Open access
Jing, Helen G., Madore, Kevin P., Schacter, Daniel L.·2017·Cognition

Abstract

A critical adaptive feature of future thinking involves the ability to generate alternative versions of possible future events. However, little is known about the nature of the processes that support this ability. Here we examined whether an episodic specificity induction - brief training in recollecting details of a recent experience that selectively impacts tasks that draw on episodic retrieval - (1) boosts alternative event generation and (2) changes one's initial perceptions of negative future events. In Experiment 1, an episodic specificity induction significantly increased the number of alternative positive outcomes that participants generated to a series of standardized negative events, compared with a control induction not focused on episodic specificity. We also observed larger decreases in the perceived plausibility and negativity of the original events in the specificity condition, where participants generated more alternative outcomes, relative to the control condition. In Experiment 2, we replicated and extended these findings using a series of personalized negative events. Our findings support the idea that episodic memory processes are involved in generating alternative outcomes to anticipated future events, and that boosting the number of alternative outcomes is related to subsequent changes in the perceived plausibility and valence of the original events, which may have implications for psychological well-being.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.010

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies suggest that structured mental simulations of stressful events can improve emotional regulation and increase the propensity for problem-focused coping.

    “For example, some studies suggest that structured mental simulations of stressful events can improve emotional regulation and increase the propensity for problem-focused coping [137,138].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Guilford JP 1967 The nature of human intelligence New York McGraw Hill

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jing, H. G., Madore, K. P., & Schacter, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Jing, Helen G.
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
169
Pages
118-128
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2750836781
Cited by
76
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG08441)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
future thinking, episodic memory, recollection, psychological well-being, event valence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Thinking, Young Adult, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review