Cited by 303Behavioral Health and InterventionsPersonality Traits and PsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Getting a grip on your feelings: effects of action orientation and external demands on intuitive affect regulation.

Open access
Koole, Sander L., Jostmann, Nils B.·2004·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

The authors propose that volitional action is supported by intuitive affect regulation, defined as flexible, efficient, and nonrepressive control of own affective states. Intuitive affect regulation should be most apparent among action-oriented individuals under demanding conditions. Consistent with this, a demanding context led action-oriented individuals to down-regulate negative affect in self-reports (Study 1), in an affective Simon task (Study 2), and in a face discrimination task (Study 3). In line with the idea that intuitive affect regulation is guided by top-down self-regulation processes, intuitive affect regulation in a face discrimination task was mediated by increases in self-accessibility (Study 3). No parallel effects emerged among action-oriented participants in a nondemanding context or among state-oriented participants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.974

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-involvement may be verified by assessing the accessibility of self-related knowledge or memory for self-related material.

    “This self-involvement may be verified by assessing the accessibility of self-related knowledge (Koole and Jostmann, 2004) or memory for self-related material (Baumann and Kuhl, 2003).”

    From Synchrony in Psychotherapy: A Review and an Integrative Framework for the Therapeutic Alliance (2016) · cites this paper as Koole and Jostmann, 2004

    The supplied passage is article metadata, not a passage describing how self-involvement was assessed. Searches for accessibility of self-related knowledge and related terms found no usable full-text passage. The separate claim about memory for self-related material is attributed to Baumann and Kuhl, not to this source. (LLM, conf=0.68)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Frijda, 1986, The emotions.
  2. Greenwald, 1988, Self-knowledge and self-deception., 113
  3. Koole, 2004b, Affective priming and affect regulation: The moderating role of action orientation. Manuscript submitted for publication
  4. Kuhl, 1983, Motivationstheoretische Aspekte der Depressionsgenese: Der Einfluss von Lageorientierung auf Schmerzempfinden, Medikamentenkon-sum und Handlungskontrolle., 411
  5. Kuhl, 1994, Action versus state orientation: Psychometric properties of the Action Control Scale (ACS-90)., 47
  6. Kuhl, 2004, Workings of the will., 411
  7. Rosahl, 1993, Handlungskontrolle und langsame Hirnpotentiale: Untersuchungen zum Einfluss subjektiv kritischer Worter (erste Ergebnisse), Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Psychologie, 2, 1
  8. Schulte, 1997, Handlungskontrolle der Angstbewaltigung: Was macht Reizkonfrontationsverfahren so effektiv?, Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 26, 118
  9. Zajonc, 1998, Emotions., Vol. 1, 591

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koole, S. L., & Jostmann, N. B.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Koole, Sander L.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2004-12
Volume
87
Issue
6
Pages
974-990
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2148740291
Cited by
303
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 14
FWCI
21.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
action orientation, state orientation, external demand, self-regulation, top-down control, face discrimination
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Discrimination, Psychological, Face, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reward, Social Behavior, Volition, Intuition, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review