The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The rejection of moral rebels: Resenting those who do the right thing.
Abstract
Four studies document the rejection of moral rebels. In Study 1, participants who made a counterattitudinal speech disliked a person who refused on principle to do so, but uninvolved observers preferred this rebel to an obedient other. In Study 2, participants taking part in a racist task disliked a rebel who refused to go along, but mere observers did not. This rejection was mediated by the perception that rebels would reject obedient participants (Study 3), but did not occur when participants described an important trait or value beforehand (Study 4). Together, these studies suggest that rebels are resented when their implicit reproach threatens the positive self-image of individuals who did not rebel.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition
Rawls, J. (1999) · doi:10.4159/9780674042582 · Cited by 9,455
Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority
Asch, S. E. (1956) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093718 · Cited by 4,267
The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self
Steele, C. M. (1988) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60229-4 · Cited by 3,697
On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort.
Elliot, A. J., & Devine, P. G. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.382 · Cited by 1,289
Russell, D. W. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/014616702237645 · Cited by 954
When beliefs yield to evidence: Reducing biased evaluation by affirming the self
Cohen, G. L., Aronson, J., & Steele, C. M. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672002611011 · Cited by 584
Dissonance and the pill: An attribution approach to studying the arousal properties of dissonance.
Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1974) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036651 · Cited by 577
Prejudice with and without compunction
Devine, P. G., Monteith, M. J., Zuwerink, J. R., & Elliot, A. J. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.817 · Cited by 572
Cited by
Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility
BÉNABOU, R., & TIROLE, J. (2010) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00843.x · Cited by 2,237
Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality
Gray, K., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2012) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2012.651387 · Cited by 1,008
Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1153260 · Cited by 682
Heroism: A Conceptual Analysis and Differentiation between Heroic Action and Altruism
Franco, Z. E., Blau, K., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2011) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022672 · Cited by 514
A Socio‐interpersonal Perspective on PTSD: The Case for Environments and Interpersonal Processes
Maercker, A., & Horn, A. B. (2013) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.1805 · Cited by 303
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · doi:10.1017/9781108923323 · Cited by 175
Can a leader be seen as too ethical? the curvilinear effects of ethical leadership
Stouten, J., van Dijke, M., Mayer, D. M., De Cremer, D., & Euwema, M. C. (2013) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.05.002 · Cited by 170
Morality in Groups: On the Social‐Regulatory Functions of Right and Wrong
Ellemers, N., & van den Bos, K. (2012) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12001 · Cited by 164
The Many Ways to Be Marginal in a Group
Ellemers, N., & Jetten, J. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868312453086 · Cited by 139
Leach, C. W., Bilali, R., & Pagliaro, S. (2015) · APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Volume 2: Group processes. · doi:10.1037/14342-005 · Cited by 120
Sawaoka, T., & Monin, B. (2018) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797618780658 · Cited by 54
Self-citationLearning a commonsense moral theory
Kleiman-Weiner, M., Saxe, R., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.005 · Cited by 53
Principles of moral accounting: How our intuitive moral sense balances rights and wrongs
Johnson, S. G. B., & Ahn, J. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104467 · Cited by 14
Watkins & Goodwin Sacrifices 2019 Pre-Print
Watkins, H. M. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gbwsq
Metadata
- Authors
- Monin, B., Sawyer, P. J., & Marquez, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76-93
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2098855123
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 37.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
