The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The case for motivated reasoning.
Abstract
It is proposed that motivation may affect reasoning through reliance on a biased set of cognitive processes--that is, strategies for accessing, constructing, and evaluating beliefs. The motivation to be accurate enhances use of those beliefs and strategies that are considered most appropriate, whereas the motivation to arrive at particular conclusions enhances use of those that are considered most likely to yield the desired conclusion. There is considerable evidence that people are more likely to arrive at conclusions that they want to arrive at, but their ability to do so is constrained by their ability to construct seemingly reasonable justifications for these conclusions. These ideas can account for a wide variety of research concerned with motivated reasoning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When people try to reason through an issue, they often work hard to find evidence that confirms their initial perspective 55-58 .”
From Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility (2022) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Khatun et al. (2022) and Ahsan et al. (2022) identify involuntary non-migrants in Bangladesh using retrospective, self-reported survey data, which run the risk of motivated reasoning (Kunda 1990).”
From Trapped by climate change? (In)voluntary immobility in Bangladesh (2025) · cites this paper as Kunda 1990
In the citing paper
“People may process information in a manner that is consistent with their partisan identities, prior beliefs, and motivations, a process known as motivated cognition (34–37).”
From Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media (2021) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“The processing of false information is likely to be motivated by a confirmation bias (e.g., Hameleers et al., 2024): People are more likely to uncritically accept information when it reassures their worldviews and political attitudes, and critically scrutinize information when it does not confirm their existing worldviews (e.g., Kunda, 1990).”
From How persuasive are political cheapfakes disseminated via social media? The effects of out-of-context visual disinformation on message credibility and issue agreement (2025) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“Based on various theories, such as the theory of motivated reasoning, which explains that decisions are often based on pre-determined goals and desirability rather than an accurate reflection of the evidence (Kunda, 1990), researchers have identified a few individual variables that may motivate the person to believe misinformation they are exposed to.These include political orientation (Chen et al”
From Deepfakes, Democracy, and the Ethics of Synthetic Media: A Synthesis of the SOLARIS Project (2026) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“the reason being people's motivated reasoning (Grossman, 2014; Kunda, 1990)-the tendency to interpret reality in a self-serving way.”
From The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework (2021) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“It is proposed that there are two distinct but coexisting human motivations that account for citizens' choice and consumption of political information: directional vs. accuracy (Kunda, 1990, or defensive vs. accuracy in Hart et al., 2009, or cognitive consistency vs. understanding in Holbert et al., 2013).”
From Do Search Algorithms Endanger Democracy? An Experimental Investigation of Algorithm Effects on Political Polarization (2020) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“The underlying reason for the reinforcing tendency of algorithms is that algorithms are naturally designed to operate with, not against, human tendencies, one of which is that people feel more comfortable with consistency and confirmation (Kunda, 1990).”
From Do Search Algorithms Endanger Democracy? An Experimental Investigation of Algorithm Effects on Political Polarization (2020) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“Yet, given the human tendency toward psychological consistency (Kunda, 1990), cognitive salience of counter-attitudinal ideas in the user mind would not be strong enough to drive routine searches online.”
From Do Search Algorithms Endanger Democracy? An Experimental Investigation of Algorithm Effects on Political Polarization (2020) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“The self has a powerful need to see itself as having integrity, but it must do so within the constraints of reality (Adler 2012, Kunda 1990, Pennebaker & Chung 2011, Wilson 2011).”
From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Kunda 1990
In the citing paper
“One kind of less epistemically rational but more epistemically committal belief in AI consciousness may manifest when AI users continue to attribute consciousness to chatbots even when strong evidence suggests otherwise, because their reasoning processes are distorted by cognitive or motivational biases.”
From Are Attributions of Consciousness to AI Chatbots Epistemically Innocent? (2026) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“many motivationally biased beliefs aren't yet fully insulated from counterevidence but depend on what has been called an”
From Are Attributions of Consciousness to AI Chatbots Epistemically Innocent? (2026) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“These mechanisms are best characterized as cognitive–motivational, insofar as they involve the goal-directed (motivational) use of information processing (cognition), as described in several classic social psychological theories88,96,97.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [97]
In the citing paper
“It is also important to emphasize that many of these top-down influences occur automatically and without awareness (Kunda, 1990; Nickerson, 1998; Nisbett & Wilson, 1977; Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
From Biased and biasing: the hidden bias cascade and bias snowball effects (2025) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“Thus, such use of reference materials causes motivation and expectations that then can bias the observations and interpretation of the actual evidence”
From Biased and biasing: the hidden bias cascade and bias snowball effects (2025) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
Citations
Cites
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The psychology of interpersonal relations
Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 17,189
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984 · cited 2×
“In several studies, incentives or admonitions to be accurate did not eliminate bias ( Fischhoff, 1977 ; Kahneman & Tversky, 1972a ; Lord, Lepper, & Preston, 1984 ; Tversky & Kahneman, 1973 ).”
BackgroundThe Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 · Cited by 7,814
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241 · cited 2×
“Bem (1972) argued that the findings could also result from self-perception: The subjects, who have limited direct ac-”
BackgroundUnrealistic optimism about future life events
Weinstein, N. D. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806 · Cited by 4,999
Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1972) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3 · Cited by 4,996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 7,501–7,600 of 9,025
Braman, E. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3482486 · Cited by 1
Click to Count: The Effects of Nonpartisan Cue Endorsements in Selecting Political Information
Calfano, B., & Vićić, J. (2021) · Journal of Political Marketing · doi:10.1080/15377857.2021.1884166
THE IMPACTS OF OFF BALANCE SHEET TYPES AND INVESTMENT POSITIONS ON INVESTORS' JUDGMENTS
Wongyim, H. (2015) · NRCT Data Center · doi:10.14457/cu.the.2015.96
How Psychological Transformations Change Conflict Understandings
Schon, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108909716.005
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.004
A Fundamental Change in Political Communication
Settle, J. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560573.001
How Do END Interactions on the News Feed Psychologically Polarize Users?
Settle, J. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560573.004 · Cited by 1
Why and How People Share Information during Conflict
Schon, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108909716.007
An Introduction to Partisan Warfare
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.002
Schon, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108909716.004
The Effects of Political Information
Jungherr, A. M., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108297820.004
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.002
Improving Promotions: An Experiment on Vertical Competitions in FirmsPreprint
Cardinaels, E., & Ize, F. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3754455
It’s Okay to Change Your Mind: You Do Not Need to Vote the Same Way Twice
Levine, K. J. (2021) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642211009277
Intention and competence for trust development and deterioration
Zheng, X. (2018) · Spiral (Imperial College London) · doi:10.25560/84550
A crise de 2008 sob o prisma da análise econômico-comportamental do direito
Okumura, A. L. (2018) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.2.2018.tde-23102020-004809
General Policy Disagreement and Broadly Targeted Court-Curbing
Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979754.004
Disillusionment Predicts DepressionPreprint
Niehuis, S. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ru7t3
Rationality, Purposefulness and Action
Elliott, C. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108290531.005
Ballots in a Partisan Civil War
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.007
Van Tongeren (2020) - Face to Face with Death: The Role of Religion in Coping with SufferingPreprint
Tongeren, D. R. V. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gnsrp
Bergmann, A. (2021) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110709834
The Guardians of Judicial Independence
Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979754.001
Biased Inference from END Interactions
Settle, J. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560573.007
It’s Not You, It’s Me … Well It’s Actually Us
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.006
The Effects of Frame and Partisan Bias on Risky-ChoicePreprint
Corbin, J. C. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/u6wg9
Fiscal Multiplier, Monetary Shock and Hand-to-Mouth HouseholdPreprint
Guo, F., Yan, I. K., Chen, T., & Hu, C. (2021) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
Academic Climate Advocacy and Activism
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.007
Freedman, E., Sachsman, D. B., & Hiles, S. S. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003041955-1
Wishful Thinking in Macroeconomic ExpectationsPreprint
Li, K. K., & Huang, B. (2021) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
Resisting Management Influence: Auditor Characteristics that Inhibit Motivated ReasoningPreprint
Fitzgerald, B., Garza, B., & Smith, K. W. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3818218
A Deep Dive into Supreme Court Evaluation and Support
Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979754.003
Duncan, M. A., Perryman, M. R., & Shaughnessy, B. (2021) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2021.1936558
Concluding Thoughts and New Designs
Trounstine, J. L. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108555722.011
Receptor expectations and interlingual translation reception
Deckert, M. (2021) · XLinguae · doi:10.18355/xl.2021.14.02.01
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.003
The END Framework of Political Interaction on Social Media
Settle, J. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560573.003
Elbel, M. (2021) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska)
Political Narratives and the US Partisan Gender Gap
Antinyan, A., Bassetti, T., Corazzini, L., & Pavesi, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675684
Cohen, E. (2021) · Informing Science and IT Education Conference · doi:10.28945/4764
Keener, R. W. (2019) · ResearchWorks at the University of Washington (University of Washington)
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.009
Assessing conflict of interest in organizations
Carlo, E. D. (2021) · Corporate Ownership and Control · doi:10.22495/cocv18i4art8
Judicial Impartiality in an Empirical EraPreprint
Eldred, T. (2020) · doi:10.31228/osf.io/ckvmq
Vanity, Narcissism, Timidity, and Fatalism
Tanesini, A. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198858836.003.0006
Attitude Psychology and Virtue Epistemology
Tanesini, A. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198858836.003.0003
Doing Well While Doing Good: Do Firms' Profit Motives for Doing Good Matter to Employees?
Berge, J. W., & Arshad, F. M. (2020) · ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Wrongs, Responsibility, Blame, and Oppression
Tanesini, A. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198858836.003.0008
Assessing the Accuracy of Farmers’ Nutrient Loss Risk Perceptions
Schwab, E. R., Kalcic, M. M., & Wilson, R. S. (2021) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-021-01519-1
THE JUDGMENTS CONTENT ABOUT THE OTHERS IS CONDITIONED BY THE SELF-STRUCTURE OF THE PERSON
Yuditseva, N. (2014) · Problems of Psychology in the 21st Century · doi:10.33225/ppc/14.08.109
Ayaz, S., Ahmad, W., & Rashid, M. U. (2018)
Kaushish, M. (2021) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07393
What Motivates People to Question Science?
Sinatra, G. M., & Hofer, B. K. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190944681.003.0006
Design Your TrustworthinessPreprint
Geng, S., & Guan, M. (2020) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
Group-Level Political Engagement
McClendon, G., & Riedl, R. B. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108761208.007
Procedural Perceptions and Motivated Reasoning
Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979754.007
Welzenbach-Vogel, I. C. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-63641-1_8 · Cited by 1
Групова дискусія як чинник радикалізації політичної поведінки молоді
Baliuta, V. V. (2017) · Scientific Studios on Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.33120/ssj.vi39(42).49
Lemay, E. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108645836.011
Losers get sick? The effects of electoral defeat on perceptions of pandemic risk
Bobba, G., Mancosu, M., Roncarolo, F., Seddone, A., & Vegetti, F. (2021) · Quaderni dell Osservatorio elettorale QOE - IJES · doi:10.36253/qoe-10749
Gibbs, J. M., Swann‐Thomsen, H. E., & Aubuchon-Endsley, N. L. (2021) · Obesities · doi:10.3390/obesities1030013
Elliott, C. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108290531.004
Religious Cycles of Government Responsiveness: Why Governments Distribute in RamadanPreprint
Mohamed, A. E. (2021) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/pfv89_v1
Ramadhani, E. (2021) · Philippine Political Science Journal · doi:10.1163/2165025x-bja10020
Identity Selection and the Social Construction of Birthdays
Pelham, B. W., DeHart, T., Shimizu, M., Hardin, C. D., Han, A., & von Hippel, W. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.693776
COVID-19 & Anti-Mask Movement: How Jingoism is Bringing the United States Down
Kim, C., & Oh, B. (2021) · Journal of Student Research · doi:10.47611/jsrhs.v10i3.1751
Settle, J. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560573.012
On Writing Roman Economic History
Elliott, C. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108290531.002
Hijacking Reason: The Moral Ecology of Implicit Bias
Murray, D. (2017) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Effective Communication About Climate Change and Sea-Level Rise
Palm, R. I., & Bolsen, T. (2021) · Coastal research library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-88435-2_4
SANSÜRLÜ AYNAYA BAKIŞ: KISITLI BİLGİ ORTAMLARINDA ALGILANAN DEMOKRASİ ARZI
Dal, A. (2021) · Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute · doi:10.30794/pausbed.909096
Rowell, A. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3947297
The Wilders divide: judgment in dutch politics
Leenheer, R. (2010)
Ahmed, R. H. (2013) · John Spoor Broome Library Institutional Repository (California State University)
Levy, N. L. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192895325.003.0007
Levy, N. L. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192895325.003.0006
Group-Motivated Sampling: From Skewed Experiences to Biased EvaluationsPreprint
Derreumaux, Y., Bergh, R., Lindskog, M., & Hughes, B. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/82x7k
Brudner, E. G., Karousatos, A. J., Fareri, D. S., & Delgado, M. R. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108770880.010 · Cited by 4
Neuropsychological Level of Trust
(2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108770880.007
Levy, N. L. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192895325.003.0003
Health MisinformationPreprint
Nan, X., Wang, Y., & Thier, K. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/uzbc7
Levy, N. L. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192895325.003.0002
Pittarello, A., & Motro, D. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_220-1
Levy, N. L. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192895325.003.0004
Group-Motivated Sampling: From Skewed Experiences to Biased EvaluationsPreprint
Derreumaux, Y., Hughes, B., Lindskog, M., & Bergh, R. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/83s2y
Wischnewski, M., & Krämer, N. (2020) · Technology Mind and Behavior · doi:10.1037/tmb0000029.supp
Emmanuel, A. Y., Akayede, I., Olagunju, A. S., Aimufua, A., Apene, O. Z., Sani, U., & Isah, S. H. (2022) · Dutse Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences · doi:10.4314/dujopas.v7i3a.22
Mele, A. R. (2001) · doi:10.1093/0195150430.003.0005
Bova, A., & Galimberti, C. (2021) · Frontiers research topics · doi:10.3389/978-2-88971-803-0
Background: Models of Action and Socialization
Vila‐Henninger, L. A. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-88278-5_3
Introduction and Overview: Intergenerational Mobility in the Modern Era
Kimmel, J. (2022) · Upjohn Research (W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research) · doi:10.17848/978088099.ch1
A Comparison of U.S. Parents’ Time with Children by Child Gender and Family Structure
Connelly, R. (2022) · Upjohn Research (W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research) · doi:10.17848/978088099.ch2 · Cited by 1
Behavioral Insights, Parental Decision Making, and Investments in Children’s Development
Kalil, A., & Mayer, S. E. (2022) · Upjohn Research (W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research) · doi:10.17848/978088099.ch3
Simon, B. C. (2004) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470773437.refs
Moral Responsibility for Self-Deluding Beings
Franz, D. J. (2022) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-022-00469-0
Metadata
- Authors
- Kunda, Z.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kunda, Ziva
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 480-498
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2149893809
- Cited by
- 9,022
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 542 · 2025: 609 · 2024: 519 · 2023: 583 · 2022: 640 · 2021: 606 · 2020: 642 · 2019: 631 · 2018: 483 · 2017: 372 · 2016: 331 · 2015: 321 · 2014: 299 · 2013: 231 · 2012: 258
- FWCI
- 23.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01mh042239-03)
- National Institute of Mental Health (1 RO1 MH42239-01A1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Keywords
- motivated reasoning, motivation, belief evaluation, cognitive strategies, accuracy motivation, confirmation bias, justification
- MeSH terms
- Attitude, Concept Formation, Humans, Motivation, Problem Solving, Social Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
