The DOI matches its Crossref record; 246 of the 254 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Abstract
Research on moral judgment has been dominated by rationalist models, in which moral judgment is thought to be caused by moral reasoning. The author gives 4 reasons for considering the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached. The social intuitionist model is presented as an alternative to rationalist models. The model is a social model in that it deemphasizes the private reasoning done by individuals and emphasizes instead the importance of social and cultural influences. The model is an intuitionist model in that it states that moral judgment is generally the result of quick, automatic evaluations (intuitions). The model is more consistent that rationalist models with recent findings in social, cultural, evolutionary, and biological psychology, as well as in anthropology and primatology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, since moral values appear to be deeply-held, stable across time, and resistant to change 11 – 13 , a parallel literature on moral cognition makes a different prediction: insofar as punishment is a method of restoring justice following a moral violation, punitive preferences should be less susceptible to group influence.”
From Crowdsourcing punishment: Individuals reference group preferences to inform their own punitive decisions (2019) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“The behaviour of individuals living in communities is regulated by moral norms and values 158-162 .”
From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [159]
In the citing paper
“Haidt [26], for example, has argued that quick, automatic processes drive moral judgment while reflective processes play a more ad hoc role.”
From Anthropomorphism in AI: hype and fallacy (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Research from social psychology suggests that when individuals encounter others who use fundamentally different moral philosophies to guide behavior, we tend to judge those others as immoral, rather than simply using a different moral perspective (Haidt, 2001(Haidt, , 2012)).”
From Taking Stock of Moral Approaches to Leadership: An Integrative Review of Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership (2019) · cites this paper as Haidt, 2001
In the citing paper
“Influential theories in psychology maintain that our moral sense is shaped by the social world (1)”
From Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Most existing research takes a dyadic perspective to study the social transmission of morality; typically, one person (such as a child) is exposed to another's ideas (e.g., parent) through behavior or communication (1,2).”
From Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“As noted, other research suggests that moral judgments are often based on moral intuitions or heuristics [1], leading to quick and simple judgments.”
From The Importance of Moral Construal: Moral versus Non-Moral Construal Elicits Faster, More Extreme, Universal Evaluations of the Same Actions (2012) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, disgust also affects our moral judgment [38,40,42].”
From Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition (2015) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“This caveat might have contributed to the similar results in the meta-analyses on moral cognition and on ToM (rather than on empathy), given that emotion processing is thought to play a paramount role in real-world moral cognition (Krebs 2008; Tangney et al. 2007; Haidt 2001).”
From Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy (2012) · cites this paper as Haidt 2001
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The Social Construction of Reality
Rose, D. M., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/323448 · Cited by 13,850
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things
Lakoff, G. P. (1987) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 · Cited by 13,358
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 7×
“To say that moral reasoning is a conscious process means that the process is intentional, effortful, and controllable and that the reasoner is aware that it is going on (Bargh, 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
(1994) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,542
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Black, 1998, Neuronal plasticity and the developing brain., 31
- Chen, 1999, The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context., 73
- D'Andrade, 1984, Cultural meaning systems., 88
- Darwin, 1998, The descent of man.
- de Waal, 1982, Chimpanzee politics.
- Frijda, 1986, The emotions.
- Hare, 1993, Without conscience.
- Harrison, 1967, Ethical objectivism., Vols. 3-4, 71
- Huttenlocher, 1994, Synaptogenesis, synapse elimination, and neural plasticity in human cerebral cortex., Vol. 27, 35
- Kagan, 1984, The nature of the child.
- Kant, 1959, Foundation of the metaphysics of morals (L. W. Beck. Trans.).
- Kohlberg, 1969, Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization., 347
- Lapsley, 1996, Moral psychology.
- Margolis, 1987, Patterns, thinking, and cognition.
- Mednick, 1982, Biology and violence., 21
- Mischel, 1976, A cognitive social-learning approach to morality and self-regulation., 84
- Newcomb, 1943, Personality and social change: Attitude formation in a student community.
- Pavlov, 1927, Conditioned reflexes.
- Perkins, 1983, Difficulties in everyday reasoning., 177
- Premack, 1995, Origins of human social competence., 205
- Rozin, 2000, Disgust., 637
- Shweder, 1997, The "big three" of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the "big three" explanations of suffering., 119
- Singer, 1994, Rethinking life and death.
- Solomon, 1993, The philosophy of emotions., 3
- Solomon, 1991, A terror management theory of social behavior., 93
- Williams, 1967, Rationalism., Vols. 7-8, 69
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,201–1,300 of 8,792
From Self to Social Relationships
van Zomeren, M. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316145388 · Cited by 67
Valuing subjectivity in journalism: Bias, emotions, and self-interest as tools in arts reporting
Chong, P. (2017) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/1464884917722453 · Cited by 67
Rethinking reappraisal: The double-edged sword of regulating negative emotions in the workplace
Feinberg, M., Ford, B. Q., & Flynn, F. J. (2020) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.03.005 · Cited by 67
Moral progress: Recent developments
Sauer, H., Blunden, C., Eriksen, C. L., & Rehren, P. (2021) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12769 · Cited by 67
Hofmann, W., & Baumert, A. (2009) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930902847193 · Cited by 67
Efficiency versus fairness: The evaluation of labor market policies by economists and laypeople
Haferkamp, A., Fetchenhauer, D., Belschak, F. D., & Enste, D. H. (2009) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2009.03.010 · Cited by 67
Oullier, O., & Bassó, F. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0168 · Cited by 67
Stirring images: Fear, not happiness or arousal, makes art more sublime.
Eskine, K. J., Kacinik, N. A., & PRINZ, J. J. (2012) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0027200 · Cited by 67
The naturalness of (many) social institutions: evolved cognition as their foundation
Boyer, P., & Petersen, M. B. (2011) · Journal of Institutional Economics · doi:10.1017/s1744137411000300 · Cited by 67
Ethics and the economist: What climate change demands of us
Nelson, J. A. (2013) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.029 · Cited by 67
Morality and justice: An expanded theoretical perspective and empirical review
Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Mullen, E. (2008) · Advances in group processes · doi:10.1016/s0882-6145(08)25001-0 · Cited by 67
Activating analytic thinking enhances the value given to individualizing moral foundations
Yılmaz, O., & Sarıbay, S. A. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.009 · Cited by 67
Moral Utility Theory: Understanding the motivation to behave (un)ethically
Hirsh, J. B., Lu, J. G., & Galinsky, A. D. (2018) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2018.10.002 · Cited by 67
Beyond Two Minds: Cognitive, Embodied, and Evaluative Processes in Creativity
Leschziner, V., & Brett, G. (2019) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0190272519851791 · Cited by 67
Zollo, L., Rialti, R., Tron, A., & Ciappei, C. (2020) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-10-2019-1500 · Cited by 67
The reliability of moral intuitions: A challenge from neuroscience
Tersman, F. (2008) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048400802002010 · Cited by 67
The Biosocial: Sociological Themes and Issues
Meloni, M., Williams, S. J., & Martin, P. B. (2016) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1002/2059-7932.12010 · Cited by 67
From moral to legal judgment: the influence of normative context in lawyers and other academics
Schleim, S., Spranger, T. M., Erk, S., & Walter, H. (2011) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsq010 · Cited by 66
People’s Judgments About Classic Property Law Cases
DeScioli, P., & Karpoff, R. (2015) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-015-9230-y · Cited by 66
Basic Emotions in Social Relationships, Reasoning, and Psychological Illnesses
Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2011) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073911410738 · Cited by 66
The Linguistic Analogy: Motivations, Results, and Speculations
Dwyer, S., Huebner, B., & HAUSER, M. D. (2009) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01064.x · Cited by 66
Schulz, A. W. (2018) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262037600.001.0001 · Cited by 66
Iqbal, F., Pfarrer, M. D., & Bundy, J. N. (2022) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2020.0371 · Cited by 66
Gilbert, P. (2024) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjc.12466 · Cited by 66
Intuition in Organizational Decision Making
Sadler‐Smith, E., & Sparrow, P. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199290468.003.0016 · Cited by 66
Kristjansson, K. R. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511676000 · Cited by 66
Trust, Reciprocity, and Favors in Cooperative Relationships
Abdulkadiroğlu, A., & Bagwell, K. W. (2013) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.5.2.213 · Cited by 66
Increased Moral Sensitivity for Outgroup Perpetrators Harming Ingroup Members
Molenberghs, P., Gapp, J., Wang, B., Louis, W. R., & Decety, J. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu195 · Cited by 66
Mercier, H. (2011) · Mind & Society · doi:10.1007/s11299-011-0085-6 · Cited by 66
Russell, P. S., Piazza, J. R., & Giner‐Sorolla, R. (2012) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550612442913 · Cited by 66
Emotional Intelligence and Consumer Ethics: The Mediating Role of Personal Moral Philosophies
Chowdhury, R. M. M. I. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2733-y · Cited by 66
Locander, D. A., Mulki, J. P., & Weinberg, F. J. (2014) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20702 · Cited by 66
Disconfirming Moral Foundations Theory on Its Own Terms
Gray, K. J., & Keeney, J. E. (2015) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550615592243 · Cited by 66
A Novel Approach to Business Ethics Education: Exploring How to Live and Work in the 21st Century
Michaelson, C. W. (2015) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2014.0129 · Cited by 66
Taufik, D., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2016) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.012 · Cited by 66
Informal, Unorganized Volunteering
Einolf, C. J., Prouteau, L., Nezhina, T. G., & Ibrayeva, A. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-26317-9_10 · Cited by 66
The mere liking effect: Attitudinal influences on attributions of moral character
Bocian, K., Baryła, W., Kulesza, W. M., Schnall, S., & Wojciszke, B. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.06.007 · Cited by 66
Young, L., & Phillips, J. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.004 · Cited by 66
The Development of Moral Reasoning
Nucci, L. P. (2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470996652.ch14 · Cited by 66
Haig, D. (2020) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/12384.001.0001 · Cited by 65
Was Aristotle right about moral decision-making? Building a new empirical model of practical wisdom
McLoughlin, S., Thoma, S. J., & Kristjansson, K. R. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0317842 · Cited by 65
Keeping others in our mind or in our heart? Distribution games under cognitive load
Hauge, K. E., Brekke, K. A., Johansson, L., Johansson‐Stenman, O., & Svedsäter, H. (2015) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-015-9454-z · Cited by 65
All Creatures Great and Small: New Perspectives on Psychology and Human–Animal Interactions
Knight, S., & Herzog, H. (2009) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01608.x · Cited by 65
Beauchamp, M. H., Dooley, J. J., & Anderson, V. A. (2013) · Brain Injury · doi:10.3109/02699052.2013.775486 · Cited by 65
Hornsey, M. J., Smith, J. R., & Begg, D. (2007) · Social Influence · doi:10.1080/15534510701476500 · Cited by 65
Walter, N. T., Montag, C., Markett, S. A., Felten, A., Voigt, G., & Reuter, M. (2012) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.01.003 · Cited by 65
From “Either‐Or” to “When and How”: A Context‐Dependent Model of Culture in Action
Abramson, C. M. (2012) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2011.00484.x · Cited by 65
Han, H., Chen, J., Jeong, C., & Glover, G. H. (2016) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2016.01.001 · Cited by 65
How Large Is the Role of Emotion in Judgments of Moral Dilemmas?
Horne, Z., & Powell, D. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154780 · Cited by 65
We Feel, Therefore We Learn: The Relevance of Affective and Social Neuroscience to Education
Immordino‐Yang, M. H., & Damásio, A. R. (2011) · LEARNing Landscapes · doi:10.36510/learnland.v5i1.535 · Cited by 65
A Computational Model of Commonsense Moral Decision Making
Kim, R., Max Kleiman-weiner, A., Abeliuk, A., Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Rahwan, I. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3278721.3278770 · Cited by 65
Wenzel, M., & Okimoto, T. G. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_13 · Cited by 65
Nucci, L. P. (2017) · Journal of Character Education · doi:10.1108/jced-12-2017-0001 · Cited by 65
The heart has its reasons: Examining the strange persistence of the American death penalty
Bandes, S. A. (2008) · Studies in law, politics, and society · doi:10.1016/s1059-4337(07)00402-4 · Cited by 65
Teaching Empathy and Ethical Decision Making in Business Schools
Baker, D. F. (2017) · Organizational Behavior Teaching Review · doi:10.1177/1052562917699028 · Cited by 64
Social metacognition in moral judgment: Decisional conflict promotes perspective taking.
Mata, A. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000170 · Cited by 64
Good Robots, Bad Robots: Morally Valenced Behavior Effects on Perceived Mind, Morality, and Trust
Banks, J. (2020) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00692-3 · Cited by 64
To push or not to push? Affective influences on moral judgment depend on decision frame
Pastötter, B., Gleixner, S., Neuhauser, T., & Bäuml, K. T. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.003 · Cited by 64
Giving Voice to Values as a Leverage Point in Business Ethics Education
Arce, D. G., & Gentile, M. C. (2014) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2470-7 · Cited by 64
Peifeng, C., Qiu, J., Li, H., & Zhang, Q. (2009) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.06.007 · Cited by 64
Dubljević, V., & Racine, É. (2014) · AJOB Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/21507740.2014.939381 · Cited by 64
When colors backfire: The impact of color cues on moral judgment
Bock, T. D., Pandelaere, M., & Kenhove, P. V. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2012.09.003 · Cited by 64
Psychic Numbing and Mass Atrocity
Slovic, P., Zionts, D., Woods, A. K., Goodman, R., & Jinks, D. P. (2018) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv550cbm.13 · Cited by 64
Russell, P. S., & Giner‐Sorolla, R. (2011) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0022600 · Cited by 64
Enhancing Decision-Making in STSE Education by Inducing Reflection and Self-Regulated Learning
Martens, H., Hasselhorn, M., & Bögeholz, S. (2015) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-015-9491-9 · Cited by 64
An Empirical Exploration of Moral Foundations Theory in Partisan News Sources
Fulgoni, D., Carpenter, J. M., Ungar, L., & Preoțiuc-Pietro, D. (2016) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/59juciv9nyjh · Cited by 64
Białek, M., & Neys, W. D. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2016.1156118 · Cited by 64
Toward a Toolkit for Emotionalizing Institutional Theory
Voronov, M. (2014) · Research on emotion in organizations · doi:10.1108/s1746-979120140000010015 · Cited by 64
Babalola, M. T., Bligh, M. C., Ogunfowora, B., Guo, L., & Garba, O. A. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3524-4 · Cited by 64
Molewijk, B. C., Kok, A. A. L., Husum, T. L., Pedersen, R., & Aasland, O. G. (2017) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-017-0190-0 · Cited by 64
Royzman, E. B., Landy, J. F., & Goodwin, G. P. (2014) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500005738 · Cited by 64
THE TERRIBLE, HORRIBLE, NO GOOD, VERY BAD TRUTH ABOUT MORALITY AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT
Greene, J. D. (2002) · Cited by 64
Justice and self-interest: two fundamental motives
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-5138 · Cited by 64
Humanizing Pedophilia as Stigma Reduction: A Large-Scale Intervention Study
Harper, C. A., Lievesley, R., Blagden, N., & Hocken, K. (2021) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-021-02057-x · Cited by 63
Malka, A., & Adelman, M. (2022) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592721004096 · Cited by 64
Educación mediática e informacional y pensamiento crítico
López-González, H., Sosa, L., Sánchez, L., & Faure‐Carvallo, A. (2023) · Revista Latina de Comunicación Social · doi:10.4185/rlcs-2023-1939 · Cited by 63
Replication of Experiments Evaluating Impact of Psychological Distance on Moral Judgment
Žeželj, I. L., & Jokić, B. R. (2014) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000188 · Cited by 63
Empathy Mediates the Effects of Age and Sex on Altruistic Moral Decision Making
Rosen, J. B., Brand, M., & Kalbe, E. (2016) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00067 · Cited by 63
Language and the Development of Spatial Reasoning
Shusterman, A., & Spelke, E. S. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179675.003.0006 · Cited by 63
The Role of Religiosity in Ethical Decision-Making: A Study on Islam and the Malaysian Workplace
Sulaiman, R., Toulson, P., Brougham, D., Lempp, F., & Haar, J. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04836-x · Cited by 62
Believing This and Alieving That: Theorizing Affect and Intuitions in International Politics
Holmes, M. (2015) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/isqu.12201 · Cited by 62
Emotion, Authority, and Death: (Raced) Negotiations in Mock Capital Jury Deliberations
Lynch, M., & Haney, C. W. (2014) · Law & Social Inquiry · doi:10.1111/lsi.12099 · Cited by 62
The Effects of Disgust on Moral Judgments
Johnson, D. J., Wortman, J., Cheung, F., Hein, M., Lucas, R. E., Donnellan, M. B., Ebersole, C. R., & Narr, R. K. (2016) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550616654211 · Cited by 62
The Problem with Morality: Impeding Progress and Increasing Divides
Kovacheff, C., Schwartz, S., Inbar, Y., & Feinberg, M. (2018) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12045 · Cited by 62
Vadera, A. K., & Pathki, C. S. (2021) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2545 · Cited by 62
Sinclair, N. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198866107.001.0001 · Cited by 62
Specificity of meta-emotion effects on moral decision-making.
Koven, N. S. (2011) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0025616 · Cited by 62
Are You Morally Modified?: The Moral Effects of Widely Used Pharmaceuticals
Levy, N. L., Douglas, T., Kahane, G., Terbeck, S., Cowen, P. J., Hewstone, M., & Savulescu, J. (2014) · Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology · doi:10.1353/ppp.2014.0023 · Cited by 62
Lady Justice Thinks Unconsciously: Unconscious Thought Can Lead to More Accurate Justice Judgments
Ham, J. R. C., van den Bos, K., & van Doorn, E. A. (2009) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.4.509 · Cited by 62
Cushman, F. A., Murray, D., Gordon-McKeon, S., Wharton, S., & Greene, J. D. (2011) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsr072 · Cited by 62
Broeders, R., van den Bos, K., Müller, P. A., & Ham, J. R. C. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.018 · Cited by 62
The Exposed Self: A Multilevel Model of Shame and Ethical Behavior
Murphy, S. A., & Kiffin‐Petersen, S. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3185-8 · Cited by 62
The social world as an experimental game
Murnighan, J. K., & Wang, L. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.02.003 · Cited by 62
Teacher dilemmas in challenging students in higher education
Scager, K., Akkerman, S. F., Pilot, A., & Wubbels, T. (2016) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1248392 · Cited by 62
The Moral Foundations of Consumer Ethics
Chowdhury, R. M. M. I. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3676-2 · Cited by 62
Egorov, M., Kalshoven, K., Verdorfer, A. P., & Peus, C. V. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04178-9 · Cited by 62
Infants’ intention-based evaluations of distributive actions
Geraci, A., Simion, F., & Surian, L. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105429 · Cited by 62
Björklund, F. (2003) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1046/j.1467-9450.2003.00367.x · Cited by 62
Reconciliation in Business Ethics: Some Advice from Aristotle
Hartman, E. M. (2008) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq200818218 · Cited by 62
The Psychology of Dilemmas and the Philosophy of Morality
Cushman, F., & Young, L. (2009) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-008-9145-3 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Haidt, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Haidt, Jonathan
- ORCID
- Haidt, Jonathan
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 814-834
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2123791568
- Semantic Scholar
- b74e8da297574fd071d4b48b7aa94ea16861aea6
- Cited by
- 8,048
- References
- 254
- Citations by year
- 2026: 365 · 2025: 479 · 2024: 360 · 2023: 447 · 2022: 497 · 2021: 468 · 2020: 535 · 2019: 511 · 2018: 405 · 2017: 401 · 2016: 408 · 2015: 416 · 2014: 436 · 2013: 433 · 2012: 369
- FWCI
- 16.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r03da012606-01)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (1-RO3-DA12606-01)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- moral judgment, moral reasoning, social intuitionism, moral intuitions, automated assessment, evolutionary psychology of morality
- MeSH terms
- Emotions, Humans, Morals, Problem Solving, Social Perception, Social Values, Intuition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
