The DOI matches its Crossref record; 246 of the 254 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Abstract
Research on moral judgment has been dominated by rationalist models, in which moral judgment is thought to be caused by moral reasoning. The author gives 4 reasons for considering the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached. The social intuitionist model is presented as an alternative to rationalist models. The model is a social model in that it deemphasizes the private reasoning done by individuals and emphasizes instead the importance of social and cultural influences. The model is an intuitionist model in that it states that moral judgment is generally the result of quick, automatic evaluations (intuitions). The model is more consistent that rationalist models with recent findings in social, cultural, evolutionary, and biological psychology, as well as in anthropology and primatology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, since moral values appear to be deeply-held, stable across time, and resistant to change 11 – 13 , a parallel literature on moral cognition makes a different prediction: insofar as punishment is a method of restoring justice following a moral violation, punitive preferences should be less susceptible to group influence.”
From Crowdsourcing punishment: Individuals reference group preferences to inform their own punitive decisions (2019) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“The behaviour of individuals living in communities is regulated by moral norms and values 158-162 .”
From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [159]
In the citing paper
“Haidt [26], for example, has argued that quick, automatic processes drive moral judgment while reflective processes play a more ad hoc role.”
From Anthropomorphism in AI: hype and fallacy (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Research from social psychology suggests that when individuals encounter others who use fundamentally different moral philosophies to guide behavior, we tend to judge those others as immoral, rather than simply using a different moral perspective (Haidt, 2001(Haidt, , 2012)).”
From Taking Stock of Moral Approaches to Leadership: An Integrative Review of Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership (2019) · cites this paper as Haidt, 2001
In the citing paper
“Influential theories in psychology maintain that our moral sense is shaped by the social world (1)”
From Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Most existing research takes a dyadic perspective to study the social transmission of morality; typically, one person (such as a child) is exposed to another's ideas (e.g., parent) through behavior or communication (1,2).”
From Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“As noted, other research suggests that moral judgments are often based on moral intuitions or heuristics [1], leading to quick and simple judgments.”
From The Importance of Moral Construal: Moral versus Non-Moral Construal Elicits Faster, More Extreme, Universal Evaluations of the Same Actions (2012) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, disgust also affects our moral judgment [38,40,42].”
From Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition (2015) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“This caveat might have contributed to the similar results in the meta-analyses on moral cognition and on ToM (rather than on empathy), given that emotion processing is thought to play a paramount role in real-world moral cognition (Krebs 2008; Tangney et al. 2007; Haidt 2001).”
From Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy (2012) · cites this paper as Haidt 2001
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The Social Construction of Reality
Rose, D. M., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/323448 · Cited by 13,850
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things
Lakoff, G. P. (1987) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 · Cited by 13,358
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 7×
“To say that moral reasoning is a conscious process means that the process is intentional, effortful, and controllable and that the reasoner is aware that it is going on (Bargh, 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
(1994) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,542
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Black, 1998, Neuronal plasticity and the developing brain., 31
- Chen, 1999, The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context., 73
- D'Andrade, 1984, Cultural meaning systems., 88
- Darwin, 1998, The descent of man.
- de Waal, 1982, Chimpanzee politics.
- Frijda, 1986, The emotions.
- Hare, 1993, Without conscience.
- Harrison, 1967, Ethical objectivism., Vols. 3-4, 71
- Huttenlocher, 1994, Synaptogenesis, synapse elimination, and neural plasticity in human cerebral cortex., Vol. 27, 35
- Kagan, 1984, The nature of the child.
- Kant, 1959, Foundation of the metaphysics of morals (L. W. Beck. Trans.).
- Kohlberg, 1969, Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization., 347
- Lapsley, 1996, Moral psychology.
- Margolis, 1987, Patterns, thinking, and cognition.
- Mednick, 1982, Biology and violence., 21
- Mischel, 1976, A cognitive social-learning approach to morality and self-regulation., 84
- Newcomb, 1943, Personality and social change: Attitude formation in a student community.
- Pavlov, 1927, Conditioned reflexes.
- Perkins, 1983, Difficulties in everyday reasoning., 177
- Premack, 1995, Origins of human social competence., 205
- Rozin, 2000, Disgust., 637
- Shweder, 1997, The "big three" of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the "big three" explanations of suffering., 119
- Singer, 1994, Rethinking life and death.
- Solomon, 1993, The philosophy of emotions., 3
- Solomon, 1991, A terror management theory of social behavior., 93
- Williams, 1967, Rationalism., Vols. 7-8, 69
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 8,792
Contagion of Entrepreneurial Passion: Effects on Employee Outcomes
Hubner, S., Baum, M., & Fresé, M. (2019) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258719883995 · Cited by 120
Kim, D., & Vandenberghe, C. (2020) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601120920050 · Cited by 120
On the Disposition to Think Analytically: Four Distinct Intuitive-Analytic Thinking Styles
Newton, C., Feeney, J. R., & Pennycook, G. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672231154886 · Cited by 120
Attitudes towards genetically modified and organic foods
Saher, M., Lindeman, M., & Hursti, U. K. (2006) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2006.01.015 · Cited by 120
Dynamical Evolutionary Psychology: Mapping the Domains of the New Interactionist Paradigm
Kenrick, D. T., Maner, J. K., Butner, J., Li, N. P., Becker, D. V., & Schaller, M. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0604_09 · Cited by 120
Unsentimental ethics: Towards a content-specific account of the moral–conventional distinction
Royzman, E. B., Leeman, R. F., & Baron, J. A. (2009) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.04.004 · Cited by 119
Public Attitudes Toward Cognitive Enhancement
Fitz, N. S., Nadler, R., Manogaran, P., Chong, E. W. J., & Reiner, P. B. (2013) · Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/s12152-013-9190-z · Cited by 119
The rat-a-gorical imperative: Moral intuition and the limits of affective learning
Greene, J. D. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.004 · Cited by 119
McKeever, S. D., & Ridge, M. (2006) · doi:10.1093/0199290652.001.0001 · Cited by 122
Trutnevyte, E., Stauffacher, M., & Scholz, R. W. (2011) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.038 · Cited by 119
Who Is Willing to Sacrifice Ethical Values for Money and Social Status?
Kennedy, J. A., & Kray, L. J. (2013) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550613482987 · Cited by 119
Hogarth, R. M. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.4324/9781410611826-11 · Cited by 119
Testing an attribution-of-blame model of judgments of injustice
Mikula, G. (2003) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.184 · Cited by 118
Levine, J., Chan, K. M. A., & Satterfield, T. A. (2015) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.010 · Cited by 118
Psychology of Human Kin Recognition: Heuristic Cues, Erroneous Inferences, and Their Implications
Park, J. H., Schaller, M., & van Vugt, M. (2008) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.12.3.215 · Cited by 118
Blind loyalty? When group loyalty makes us see evil or engage in it
Hildreth, J. A. D., Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. H. (2015) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.10.001 · Cited by 118
Osbeck, L. M., Nersessian, N. J., Malone, K. R., & Newstetter, W. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511933936 · Cited by 118
Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda
Clark, C. J., Jussim, L. J., Frey, K., Stevens, S. T., al‐Gharbi, M., Aquino, K. F., Bailey, J. M., Barbaro, N., Baumeister, R. F., Bleske-Rechek, A. L., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2301642120 · Cited by 118
Pursuing moral outrage: Anger at torture
Batson, C. D., Chao, M. C., & Givens, J. M. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.017 · Cited by 118
Modularity and the Social Mind
Kurzban, R., & Aktipis, A. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868306294906 · Cited by 118
How Can It Be Made Right Again? A Review of Trust Repair Research
Sharma, K., Schoorman, F. D., & Ballinger, G. A. (2023) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063221089897 · Cited by 117
Yilmaz, O., Harma, M., Bahçekapili, H. G., & Cesur, S. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.090 · Cited by 117
The Effectiveness of Ethics Education: A Quasi-Experimental Field Study
May, D. R., & Luth, M. T. (2012) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9349-0 · Cited by 117
Boroditsky, L., & PRINZ, J. J. (2008) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805837.005 · Cited by 117
Unconscious emotion: A cognitive neuroscientific perspective
Smith, R. S., & Lane, R. D. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.013 · Cited by 118
Exemplars and nudges: Combining two strategies for moral education
Engelen, B., Thomas, A., Archer, A., & van de Ven, N. (2018) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2017.1396966 · Cited by 117
Disgust: The body and soul emotion in the 21st century.
Rozin, P. N., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. R. (2009) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/11856-001 · Cited by 117
Self-citationEllemers, N., Kingma, L., van de Burgt, J., & Barreto, M. (2011) · Cited by 117
A Hunger for God: Embodied Metaphor as Cultural Cognition in Action
Winchester, D. (2016) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sow065 · Cited by 117
Personality Dispositions and Political Preferences Across Hard and Easy Issues
Johnston, C. D., & Wronski, J. (2013) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12068 · Cited by 116
Power, Moral Clarity, and Punishment in the Workplace
Wiltermuth, S. S., & Flynn, F. J. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0960 · Cited by 116
de Beukelaar, M. F. A., Zeinstra, G. G., Mes, J. J., & Fischer, A. R. H. (2018) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.06.005 · Cited by 116
Effects of Anger, Guilt, and Envy on Moral Hypocrisy
Polman, E., & Ruttan, R. L. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167211422365 · Cited by 116
Dynamic Development of Thinking, Feeling, and Acting
Mascolo, M. F., & Fischer, K. W. (2015) · Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science · doi:10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy104 · Cited by 115
How companies’ good deeds encourage consumers to adopt pro-social behavior
Romani, S., & Grappi, S. (2014) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-06-2012-0364 · Cited by 115
Stichter, M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108691970 · Cited by 116
The Cognitive Unconscious in Everyday Life
Bargh, J. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197501573.003.0005 · Cited by 115
Moral competence in social robots
Malle, B. F., & Scheutz, M. J. (2014) · IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology (ETHICS) · doi:10.1109/ethics.2014.6893446 · Cited by 114
The moral pop-out effect: Enhanced perceptual awareness of morally relevant stimuli
Gantman, A. P., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.02.007 · Cited by 114
Gratitude in the UK: A new prototype analysis and a cross-cultural comparison
Morgan, B. E., Gulliford, L., & Kristjansson, K. R. (2014) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2014.898321 · Cited by 113
McGraw, A. P., Schwartz, J. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (2011) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/662070 · Cited by 113
Culture and Embodied Cognition: Moral Discourses in Internet Support Groups for Overeaters
Ignatow, G. (2009) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.0.0262 · Cited by 113
Does ethical membership matter? Moral identification and its organizational implications.
May, D. R., Chang, Y. K., & Shao, R. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038344 · Cited by 113
Who's with Me? False Consensus, Brokerage, and Ethical Decision Making in Organizations
Flynn, F. J., & Wiltermuth, S. S. (2010) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.54533202 · Cited by 113
Martens, H., Hasselhorn, M., & Bögeholz, S. (2011) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.617789 · Cited by 112
DeScioli, P., Christner, J., & Kurzban, R. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611400616 · Cited by 113
Methodological Issues in the Neuroscience of Moral Judgement
Kahane, G., & Shackel, N. A. (2010) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01401.x · Cited by 113
Lessons from Morality-Based Social Identity: The Power of Outgroup “Hate,” Not Just Ingroup “Love”
Parker, M. T., & Janoff‐Bulman, R. (2013) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0175-6 · Cited by 112
Forgiveness in Romantic Relationships: The Roles of Attachment, Empathy, and Attributions
Kimmes, J. G., & Durtschi, J. A. (2016) · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/jmft.12171 · Cited by 112
Bieleke, M., Gollwitzer, P. M., Oettingen, G., & Fischbacher, U. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1975 · Cited by 112
The magical number two, plus or minus: Dual-process theory as a theory of cognitive kinds
Samuels, R. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0006 · Cited by 112
How do employees react to leaders’ unethical behavior? The role of moral disengagement
Fehr, R., Fulmer, A., & Keng, F. T. (2019) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12366 · Cited by 112
Why Isn't Government Policy More Preventive?
Cairney, P., & Denny, E. S. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198793298.001.0001 · Cited by 112
The Cambridge Companion to Virtue Ethics
(2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cco9780511734786 · Cited by 112
Rational Learners and Moral Rules
Nichols, S., Kumar, S., Lopez, T., Ayars, A., & Chan, H. (2016) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12119 · Cited by 111
A Framework for the Consumer Psychology of Morality in the Marketplace
Campbell, M. C., & Winterich, K. P. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1038 · Cited by 111
Perlaviciute, G., Steg, L., Contzen, N., Roeser, S., & Huijts, N. M. A. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10072526 · Cited by 111
Self-Interest Bias in Moral Judgments of Others’ Actions
Bocian, K., & Wojciszke, B. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167214529800 · Cited by 110
Principle of Care and Giving to Help People in Need
Bekkers, R., & Ottoni–Wilhelm, M. (2016) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2057 · Cited by 110
Our moral choices are foreign to us.
Corey, J. D., Hayakawa, S. L., Foucart, A., Aparici, M., Botella, J., Costa, A., & Keysar, B. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000356 · Cited by 110
Deep teaching in a college STEM classroom
Dewsbury, B. M. (2019) · Cultural Studies of Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11422-018-9891-z · Cited by 110
Zollo, L. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04420-4 · Cited by 110
Wannow, S., Haupt, M., & Ohlwein, M. (2023) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/s41262-023-00326-9 · Cited by 110
Shepherd, L., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.011 · Cited by 110
Impressions of functional food consumers
Saher, M., Arvola, A., Lindeman, M., & Lähteenmäki, L. (2003) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2003.07.002 · Cited by 110
Affect, Moral Intuition, and Risk
Slovic, P., & Västfjäll, D. (2010) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2010.521119 · Cited by 110
Arrested development: early prefrontal lesions impair the maturation of moral judgement
Taber‐Thomas, B. C., Asp, E. W., Koenigs, M. R., Sutterer, M. J., Anderson, S. W., & Tranel, D. (2014) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt377 · Cited by 110
Goodwin, G. P., & Darley, J. M. (2009) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-009-0013-4 · Cited by 110
The Moral brain: a multidisciplinary perspective
Decety, J., & Wheatley, T. (2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.192126 · Cited by 110
Psychological and sociomoral reasoning in infancy.
Renée Baillargeon, B., Scott, R. M., He, Z., Sloane, S. M., Setoh, P., Jin, K., Wu, D., & Bian, L. (2014) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/14341-003 · Cited by 109
Equity or equality? Moral judgments follow the money
DeScioli, P., Massenkoff, M., Shaw, A., Petersen, M. B., & Kurzban, R. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.2112 · Cited by 109
Vicario, C. M., Rafal, R. D., Martino, D., & Avenanti, A. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.05.008 · Cited by 109
The myth of ‘evidence-based policymaking’ in a decentred state
Cairney, P. (2020) · Public Policy and Administration · doi:10.1177/0952076720905016 · Cited by 109
Wright, J. C., Warren, M. T., & Snow, N. E. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190655136.001.0001 · Cited by 109
The role of automaticity in determining the inclination to forgive close others
Karremans, J. C., & Aarts, H. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.012 · Cited by 109
Corticolimbic gating of emotion-driven punishment
Treadway, M. T., Buckholtz, J. W., Martin, J. W., Jan, K., Asplund, C. L., Ginther, M. R., Jones, O. D., & Marois, R. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3781 · Cited by 108
When Mental States Matter, When They Don't, and What That Means for Morality
Young, L., & Tsoi, L. (2013) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12044 · Cited by 108
Lay Rationalism: Individual Differences in using Reason versus Feelings to Guide Decisions
Hsee, C. K., Yang, Y., Zheng, X., & Wang, H. (2014) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0532 · Cited by 108
Reidian Religious Epistemology and the Cognitive Science of Religion
Clark, K. J., & Barrett, J. L. (2011) · Journal of the American Academy of Religion · doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfr008 · Cited by 108
Understanding the multiple conceptions of animal welfare
Weary, D. M., & Robbins, J. (2019) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.7120/09627286.28.1.033 · Cited by 108
Stein, R., & Swan, A. B. (2019) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12434 · Cited by 108
Leveraging Social Science to Generate Lasting Engagement with Climate Change Solutions
Goldberg, M. H., Gustafson, A., & van der Linden, S. (2020) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.08.011 · Cited by 108
The Influence of Affect on Attitude
Clore, G. L., & Schnall, S. (2005) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.4324/9781315178103-6 · Cited by 108
Making it moral: Merely labeling an attitude as moral increases its strength
Luttrell, A., Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & Wagner, B. C. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.04.003 · Cited by 107
Van Bavel, J. J., Packer, D. J., Haas, I. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048693 · Cited by 107
Leschziner, V., & Green, A. I. (2013) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/0735275113489806 · Cited by 107
When Values and Behavior Conflict: Moral Pluralism and Intrapersonal Moral Hypocrisy
Graham, J., Meindl, P., Koleva, S. P., Iyer, R., & JOHNSON, K. (2015) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12158 · Cited by 107
Jacobs, T. P., & McConnell, A. R. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101797 · Cited by 107
The meta-ethical grounding of our moral beliefs: Evidence for meta-ethical pluralism
Wright, J. C., Grandjean, P. T., & McWhite, C. B. (2012) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2011.633751 · Cited by 107
He, H., & Harris, L. C. (2014) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2013.10.002 · Cited by 107
Leaving a Legacy: Intergenerational Allocations of Benefits and Burdens
Wade‐Benzoni, K. A., Sondak, H., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq20102013 · Cited by 107
Decision making and testosterone: When the ends justify the means
Carney, D. R., & Mason, M. F. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.02.003 · Cited by 106
A Systematic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education
Li, J., & Fu, S. (2010) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9249-8 · Cited by 106
The Evaluative Lexicon 2.0: The measurement of emotionality, extremity, and valence in language
Rocklage, M. D., Rucker, D. D., & Nordgren, L. F. (2017) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0975-6 · Cited by 106
On the Wrong Track: Process and Content in Moral Psychology
Kahane, G. (2012) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12001 · Cited by 106
Construal levels and moral judgment: Some complications
Gong, H., & Medin, D. L. (2012) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500006343 · Cited by 106
Analytic thinking: do you feel like it?
Thompson, V. L., & Morsanyi, K. (2012) · Mind & Society · doi:10.1007/s11299-012-0100-6 · Cited by 105
Lawrence, T. B. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0714 · Cited by 105
Ding, W., Shao, Y., Sun, B., Xie, R., Li, W., & Wang, X. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00814 · Cited by 105
Xu, H., Bolton, L. E., & Winterich, K. P. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucaa067 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Haidt, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Haidt, Jonathan
- ORCID
- Haidt, Jonathan
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 814-834
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2123791568
- Semantic Scholar
- b74e8da297574fd071d4b48b7aa94ea16861aea6
- Cited by
- 8,048
- References
- 254
- Citations by year
- 2026: 365 · 2025: 479 · 2024: 360 · 2023: 447 · 2022: 497 · 2021: 468 · 2020: 535 · 2019: 511 · 2018: 405 · 2017: 401 · 2016: 408 · 2015: 416 · 2014: 436 · 2013: 433 · 2012: 369
- FWCI
- 16.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r03da012606-01)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (1-RO3-DA12606-01)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- moral judgment, moral reasoning, social intuitionism, moral intuitions, automated assessment, evolutionary psychology of morality
- MeSH terms
- Emotions, Humans, Morals, Problem Solving, Social Perception, Social Values, Intuition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
