The DOI matches its Crossref record; 245 of the 254 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Abstract
Research on moral judgment has been dominated by rationalist models, in which moral judgment is thought to be caused by moral reasoning. The author gives 4 reasons for considering the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached. The social intuitionist model is presented as an alternative to rationalist models. The model is a social model in that it deemphasizes the private reasoning done by individuals and emphasizes instead the importance of social and cultural influences. The model is an intuitionist model in that it states that moral judgment is generally the result of quick, automatic evaluations (intuitions). The model is more consistent that rationalist models with recent findings in social, cultural, evolutionary, and biological psychology, as well as in anthropology and primatology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, since moral values appear to be deeply-held, stable across time, and resistant to change 11 – 13 , a parallel literature on moral cognition makes a different prediction: insofar as punishment is a method of restoring justice following a moral violation, punitive preferences should be less susceptible to group influence.”
From Crowdsourcing punishment: Individuals reference group preferences to inform their own punitive decisions (2019) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“The behaviour of individuals living in communities is regulated by moral norms and values 158-162 .”
From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [159]
In the citing paper
“Haidt [26], for example, has argued that quick, automatic processes drive moral judgment while reflective processes play a more ad hoc role.”
From Anthropomorphism in AI: hype and fallacy (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Research from social psychology suggests that when individuals encounter others who use fundamentally different moral philosophies to guide behavior, we tend to judge those others as immoral, rather than simply using a different moral perspective (Haidt, 2001(Haidt, , 2012)).”
From Taking Stock of Moral Approaches to Leadership: An Integrative Review of Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership (2019) · cites this paper as Haidt, 2001
In the citing paper
“Influential theories in psychology maintain that our moral sense is shaped by the social world (1)”
From Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Most existing research takes a dyadic perspective to study the social transmission of morality; typically, one person (such as a child) is exposed to another's ideas (e.g., parent) through behavior or communication (1,2).”
From Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“As noted, other research suggests that moral judgments are often based on moral intuitions or heuristics [1], leading to quick and simple judgments.”
From The Importance of Moral Construal: Moral versus Non-Moral Construal Elicits Faster, More Extreme, Universal Evaluations of the Same Actions (2012) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, disgust also affects our moral judgment [38,40,42].”
From Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition (2015) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“This caveat might have contributed to the similar results in the meta-analyses on moral cognition and on ToM (rather than on empathy), given that emotion processing is thought to play a paramount role in real-world moral cognition (Krebs 2008; Tangney et al. 2007; Haidt 2001).”
From Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy (2012) · cites this paper as Haidt 2001
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The Social Construction of Reality
Rose, D. M., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/323448 · Cited by 13,850
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things
Lakoff, G. P. (1987) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 · Cited by 13,358
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 7×
“To say that moral reasoning is a conscious process means that the process is intentional, effortful, and controllable and that the reasoner is aware that it is going on (Bargh, 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
(1994) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,542
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Black, 1998, Neuronal plasticity and the developing brain., 31
- Chen, 1999, The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context., 73
- D'Andrade, 1984, Cultural meaning systems., 88
- Darwin, 1998, The descent of man.
- de Waal, 1982, Chimpanzee politics.
- Frijda, 1986, The emotions.
- Hare, 1993, Without conscience.
- Harrison, 1967, Ethical objectivism., Vols. 3-4, 71
- Huttenlocher, 1994, Synaptogenesis, synapse elimination, and neural plasticity in human cerebral cortex., Vol. 27, 35
- Kagan, 1984, The nature of the child.
- Kant, 1959, Foundation of the metaphysics of morals (L. W. Beck. Trans.).
- Kohlberg, 1969, Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization., 347
- Lapsley, 1996, Moral psychology.
- Margolis, 1987, Patterns, thinking, and cognition.
- Mednick, 1982, Biology and violence., 21
- Mischel, 1976, A cognitive social-learning approach to morality and self-regulation., 84
- Newcomb, 1943, Personality and social change: Attitude formation in a student community.
- Pavlov, 1927, Conditioned reflexes.
- Perkins, 1983, Difficulties in everyday reasoning., 177
- Premack, 1995, Origins of human social competence., 205
- Rozin, 2000, Disgust., 637
- Shweder, 1997, The "big three" of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the "big three" explanations of suffering., 119
- Singer, 1994, Rethinking life and death.
- Solomon, 1993, The philosophy of emotions., 3
- Solomon, 1991, A terror management theory of social behavior., 93
- Williams, 1967, Rationalism., Vols. 7-8, 69
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 8,792
Why the Sociology of Morality Needs Bourdieu's Habitus*
Ignatow, G. (2008) · Sociological Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1475-682x.2008.00273.x · Cited by 105
Rom, S. C., Weiß, A., & Conway, P. J. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.007 · Cited by 105
Thinking : psychological perspectives on reasoning, judgment and decision making
Hardman, D. K., & Macchi, L. (2003) · Cited by 105
Thick Concepts and the Moral Brain
Abend, G. (2011) · European Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1017/s0003975611000051 · Cited by 104
Disparities in the moral intuitions of criminal offenders: The role of psychopathy
Aharoni, E., Antonenko, O., & Kiehl, K. A. (2011) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.02.005 · Cited by 104
Temporal Dynamics of Cognitive–Emotional Interplay in Moral Decision-making
Sarlo, M., Lotto, L., Manfrinati, A., Rumiati, R., Gallicchio, G., & Palomba, D. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00146 · Cited by 104
Gray, K. J., & Schein, C. (2012) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-012-0112-5 · Cited by 104
An Agent Harms a Victim: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on Specific Moral Emotions
Kédia, G., Berthoz, S., Wessa, M., Hilton, D., & Martinot, J.-L. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20070 · Cited by 103
Perceptions of Moral Violations and Personality Traits Among Heroes and Villains
Eden, A., Oliver, M. B., Tamborini, R., Limperos, A. M., & Woolley, J. K. (2014) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2014.923462 · Cited by 103
How serotonin shapes moral judgment and behavior
Siegel, J. Z., & Crockett, M. J. (2013) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12229 · Cited by 103
Abe, N., & Greene, J. D. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0217-14.2014 · Cited by 101
Moralization Through Moral Shock
Wisneski, D. C., & Skitka, L. J. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167216676479 · Cited by 103
Antonetti, P., Manika, D., & Katsikeas, C. S. (2019) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.02.003 · Cited by 103
Schaefer, U., & Bouwmeester, O. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04520-6 · Cited by 103
Politics at the Mall: The Moral Foundations of Boycotts
Fernandes, D. V. D. H. (2020) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1177/0743915620943178 · Cited by 103
Group-Based Dominance and Opposition to Equality Correspond to Different Psychological Motives
Kugler, M. B., Cooper, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2010) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-010-0112-5 · Cited by 103
Why mood affects help giving, but not moral courage: Comparing two types of prosocial behaviour
Kayser, D. N., Greitemeyer, T., Fischer, P. A., & Frey, D. (2009) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.717 · Cited by 103
Altered emotional morality in frontotemporal dementia
Mendez, M. F., & Shapira, J. S. (2009) · Cognitive Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1080/13546800902924122 · Cited by 103
Limited Capacity to Lie: Cognitive Load Interferes with Being Dishonest.
Veer, A. V. '., Stel, M., & van Beest, I. (2013) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500005751 · Cited by 103
No Harm, No Foul: The Outcome Bias in Ethical JudgmentsPreprint
Gino, F., Moore, D. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1099464 · Cited by 103
Schaller, M. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119125563.evpsych107 · Cited by 103
Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001008 · Cited by 105
Haruno, M., Kimura, M., & Frith, C. D. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00589 · Cited by 102
Will the Real Moral Judgment Please Stand Up?
Kennett, J., & Fine, C. (2008) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-008-9136-4 · Cited by 102
Evaluation is a Dynamic Process: Moving Beyond Dual System Models
Bavel, J. J. V., Xiao, Y. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2012) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00438.x · Cited by 102
Cognitive Reflection and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218783192 · Cited by 102
van Prooijen, J. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167205284964 · Cited by 102
An Exploratory Investigation of the Effect of Ethical Culture in Activating Moral Imagination
Moberg, D. J., & Caldwell, D. F. (2006) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9190-6 · Cited by 102
Moral Symbols: A Necklace of Garlic against Unethical Requests
Desai, S. D., & Kouchaki, M. (2016) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0008 · Cited by 102
Exploratory factor analysis on occupational stress in context of Malaysian sewerage operations
Bahkia, A. S., Awang, Z., Afthanorhan, A., Ghazali, P. L., & Foziah, H. (2019) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/1.5121111 · Cited by 101
What does it mean to say that cultured meat is unnatural?
Wilks, M., Hornsey, M. J., & Bloom, P. (2020) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.104960 · Cited by 101
Vanishing Boycott Impetus: Why and How Consumer Participation in a Boycott Decreases Over Time
Lasarov, W., Hoffmann, S., & Orth, U. R. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04997-9 · Cited by 101
A Cognitive–Intuitionist Model of Moral Judgment
Dedeke, A. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1965-y · Cited by 101
Gross gods and icky atheism: Disgust responses to rejected religious beliefs
Ritter, R. S., & Preston, J. L. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.006 · Cited by 101
Warren, D. E., & Smith‐Crowe, K. (2008) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.004 · Cited by 101
Order effects in moral judgment
Wiegmann, A., Okan, Y., & Nagel, J. (2012) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2011.631995 · Cited by 101
Morality and psychological distance: A construal level theory perspective.
Eyal, T., & Liberman, N. (2011) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/13091-010 · Cited by 101
Ethical Leadership Evaluations After Moral Transgression: Social Distance Makes the Difference
Tumasjan, A., Strobel, M., & Welpe, I. M. (2010) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0671-2 · Cited by 101
Resolving the Debate on Innate Ideas
Tooby, J., & Barrett, H. C. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179675.003.0018 · Cited by 101
Political differences in free will belief are associated with differences in moralization.
Everett, J. A. C., Clark, C. J., Meindl, P., Luguri, J. B., Earp, B. D., Graham, J., Ditto, P. H., & Shariff, A. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000286 · Cited by 100
Unethical employee behaviour: a review and typology
Veetikazhi, R., Kamalanabhan, T. J., Malhotra, P., Arora, R., & Mueller, A. (2020) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2020.1810738 · Cited by 100
Gibbs, J. C. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190878214.001.0001 · Cited by 101
Moral distance in dictator games
Aguiar, F., Brañas‐Garza, P., & Miller, L. M. (2008) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500000917 · Cited by 100
Sundar, A., & Kellaris, J. J. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2918-4 · Cited by 99
Moral judgment in adults with autism spectrum disorders
Zalla, T., Barlassina, L., Buon, M., & Leboyer, M. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.004 · Cited by 99
Quade, M. J., Greenbaum, R. L., & Petrenko, O. V. (2016) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12164 · Cited by 99
Disgust sensitivity is primarily associated with purity-based moral judgments.
Wagemans, F. M. A., Brandt, M. J., & Zeelenberg, M. (2017) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000359 · Cited by 99
Escadas, M., Jalali, M. S., & Farhangmehr, M. (2019) · Business Ethics A European Review · doi:10.1111/beer.12237 · Cited by 99
MoralBench: Moral Evaluation of LLMs
Ji, J., Chen, Y., Jin, M., Xu, W., Hua, W., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3748239.3748246 · Cited by 99
California Parents’ Preferences and Beliefs Regarding School‐Based Sex Education Policy
Constantine, N. A., Jerman, P., & Huang, A. X. (2007) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/3916707 · Cited by 99
Philosophical Thought Experiments, Intuitions, and Cognitive Equilibrium
Gendler, T. S. (2007) · Midwest Studies in Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.2007.00154.x · Cited by 98
Prospection in Individual and Interpersonal Corruption Dilemmas
Köbis, N., van Prooijen, J., Righetti, F., & Lange, P. A. M. V. (2016) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000069 · Cited by 98
People systematically update moral judgments of blame.
Monroe, A. E., & Malle, B. F. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000137 · Cited by 98
An Inductively Generated Typology and Process Model of Workplace Courage
Schilpzand, P., Hekman, D. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (2014) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0928 · Cited by 98
Measuring Emotional Response: Comparing Alternative Approaches to Measurement
Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2015) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2015.65 · Cited by 99
YouTube Beauty Gurus and the emotional labour of tribal entrepreneurship
Mardon, R., Molesworth, M., & Grigore, G. F. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.017 · Cited by 98
Rynes, S. L., Colbert, A. E., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318796934 · Cited by 99
van Goethem, A. A. J., van Hoof, A., de Castro, B. O., van Aken, M. A. G., & Hart, D. A. (2014) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12274 · Cited by 97
Takezawa, M., Gummerum, M., & Keller, M. (2005) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2005.06.012 · Cited by 97
When Sustainability is Not a Liability: The Halo Effect of Marketplace Morality
Chernev, A., & Blair, S. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1195 · Cited by 97
Lewczuk, K., Nowakowska, I., Lewandowska, K., Potenza, M. N., & Gola, M. K. (2020) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.15272 · Cited by 97
A framework for understanding reasoning errors: From fake news to climate change and beyond
Pennycook, G. (2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2022.11.003 · Cited by 95
Forgiveness in personal relationships: Its malleability and powerful consequences
Karremans, J. C., & Lange, P. A. M. V. (2008) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280802402609 · Cited by 97
Business Ethics and the Brain:Rommel Salvador and Robert G. Folger
Salvador, R. O., & Folger, R. G. (2009) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq20091911 · Cited by 97
Greenbaum, R. L., Mawritz, M. B., Bonner, J. M., Webster, B. D., & Kim, J. (2018) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2258 · Cited by 96
Selective impairment of cognitive empathy for moral judgment in adults with high functioning autism
Gleichgerrcht, E. L., Torralva, T., Rattazzi, A., Marenco, V., Roca, M., & Manes, F. F. (2012) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nss067 · Cited by 96
Samper, A., Yang, L. W., & Daniels, M. E. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx116 · Cited by 96
Huang, Y., Greenbaum, R. L., Bonner, J., & Wang, C. S. (2018) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000359 · Cited by 96
‘I could help, but . . .’: A dynamic sensemaking model of workplace bullying bystanders
Ng, K., Niven, K. R., & Hoel, H. (2019) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726719884617 · Cited by 96
Heyes, C. M. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221112075 · Cited by 96
What a Feeling: The Role of Immediate and Anticipated Emotions in Risky Decisions
Schlösser, T. M., Dunning, D. A., & Fetchenhauer, D. (2011) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.757 · Cited by 96
The neuroscience of moral cognition: from dual processes to dynamic systems
Van Bavel, J. J., FeldmanHall, O., & Mende-Siedlecki, P. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.08.009 · Cited by 95
Punish or Protect? How Close Relationships Shape Responses to Moral Violations
Weidman, A. C., Sowden, W. J., Berg, M. K., & Kross, E. F. (2019) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167219873485 · Cited by 95
Theorizing Moral Cognition: Culture in Action, Situations, and Relationships
Luft, A. (2020) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/2378023120916125 · Cited by 95
Waldmann, M. R., Nagel, J., & Wiegmann, A. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0019 · Cited by 95
Chen, C., & Lai, C.-T. (2014) · Business Ethics A European Review · doi:10.1111/beer.12053 · Cited by 95
Exploring the Influence of Emotion on Human Decision Making in Human–Wildlife Conflict
Hudenko, H. W. (2012) · Human Dimensions of Wildlife · doi:10.1080/10871209.2012.623262 · Cited by 95
An assessment of the temporal dynamics of moral decisions
Koop, G. J. (2013) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500003636 · Cited by 95
On the Assessment of Decision Quality: Considerations Regarding Utility, Conflict and Accountability
Keren, G. B., & de Bruin, W. B. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/047001332x.ch16 · Cited by 95
Moorean Arguments and Moral Revisionism
McPherson, T. (2009) · Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy · doi:10.26556/jesp.v3i2.31 · Cited by 94
Confabulation and constructive memory
Robins, S. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1315-1 · Cited by 94
Rhee, J. J.-S., Schein, C., & Bastian, B. B. (2019) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12511 · Cited by 94
Switching Tracks? Towards a Multidimensional Model of Utilitarian Psychology
Everett, J. A. C., & Kahane, G. (2020) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.012 · Cited by 94
Denton, M. L., Flory, R. W., & Smith, C. S. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190064785.001.0001 · Cited by 94
Comparing the effect of rational and emotional appeals on donation behavior
Lindauer, M., Mayorga, M. W., Greene, J. D., Slovic, P., Västfjäll, D., & Singer, P. (2020) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500007208 · Cited by 94
Kristjansson, K. R., & Fowers, B. J. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192871473.001.0001 · Cited by 94
The Antecedents of Moral Imagination in the Workplace: A Social Cognitive Theory Perspective
Whitaker, B. G., & Godwin, L. N. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1327-1 · Cited by 94
Turiel, E. (2008) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000113154 · Cited by 94
Ethical Dilemmas in Veterinary Medicine
Morgan, C. A., & McDonald, M. (2007) · Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cvsm.2006.09.008 · Cited by 94
Morality, culture and the dialogic self: taking cultural pluralism seriously
Haste, H., & Abrahams, S. (2008) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240802227502 · Cited by 94
Time to Give Up the Dogmas of Attribution
Malle, B. F. (2011) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385522-0.00006-8 · Cited by 95
The contact principle and utilitarian moral judgments in young children
Pellizzoni, S., Siegal, M., & Surian, L. (2009) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00851.x · Cited by 93
Challenging Moral Attitudes With Moral Messages
Luttrell, A., Philipp-Muller, A. Z., & Petty, R. E. (2019) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797619854706 · Cited by 93
Pesut, B., Thorne, S. E., Storch, J. L., Chambaere, K., Greig, M., & Burgess, M. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.15427 · Cited by 93
Personal Norms for Dealing with Climate Change: Results from a Survey Using Moral Foundations Theory
Jansson, J., & Dorrepaal, E. (2015) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.1598 · Cited by 93
An Attributional Analysis of Moral Emotions: Naïve Scientists and Everyday Judges
Rudolph, U., & Tscharaktschiew, N. (2014) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073914534507 · Cited by 93
The Role of Morality in Emotional Reactions to and Enjoyment of Media Entertainment
Raney, A. A. (2011) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000027 · Cited by 92
Shame, Pleasure, and The Divided Soul
Moss, J. (2005) · Oxford studies in ancient philosophy · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199287444.003.0005 · Cited by 92
Nazarov, A., Fikretoglu, D., Liu, A., Thompson, M. M., & Zamorski, M. A. (2018) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/acps.12866 · Cited by 92
Crawford, J. T. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.004 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Haidt, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Haidt, Jonathan
- ORCID
- Haidt, Jonathan
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 814-834
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2123791568
- Semantic Scholar
- b74e8da297574fd071d4b48b7aa94ea16861aea6
- Cited by
- 8,048
- References
- 254
- Citations by year
- 2026: 365 · 2025: 479 · 2024: 360 · 2023: 447 · 2022: 497 · 2021: 468 · 2020: 535 · 2019: 511 · 2018: 405 · 2017: 401 · 2016: 408 · 2015: 416 · 2014: 436 · 2013: 433 · 2012: 369
- FWCI
- 16.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r03da012606-01)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (1-RO3-DA12606-01)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- moral judgment, moral reasoning, social intuitionism, moral intuitions, automated assessment, evolutionary psychology of morality
- MeSH terms
- Emotions, Humans, Morals, Problem Solving, Social Perception, Social Values, Intuition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
