The DOI matches its Crossref record; 246 of the 254 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Abstract
Research on moral judgment has been dominated by rationalist models, in which moral judgment is thought to be caused by moral reasoning. The author gives 4 reasons for considering the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached. The social intuitionist model is presented as an alternative to rationalist models. The model is a social model in that it deemphasizes the private reasoning done by individuals and emphasizes instead the importance of social and cultural influences. The model is an intuitionist model in that it states that moral judgment is generally the result of quick, automatic evaluations (intuitions). The model is more consistent that rationalist models with recent findings in social, cultural, evolutionary, and biological psychology, as well as in anthropology and primatology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, since moral values appear to be deeply-held, stable across time, and resistant to change 11 – 13 , a parallel literature on moral cognition makes a different prediction: insofar as punishment is a method of restoring justice following a moral violation, punitive preferences should be less susceptible to group influence.”
From Crowdsourcing punishment: Individuals reference group preferences to inform their own punitive decisions (2019) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“The behaviour of individuals living in communities is regulated by moral norms and values 158-162 .”
From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [159]
In the citing paper
“Haidt [26], for example, has argued that quick, automatic processes drive moral judgment while reflective processes play a more ad hoc role.”
From Anthropomorphism in AI: hype and fallacy (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Research from social psychology suggests that when individuals encounter others who use fundamentally different moral philosophies to guide behavior, we tend to judge those others as immoral, rather than simply using a different moral perspective (Haidt, 2001(Haidt, , 2012)).”
From Taking Stock of Moral Approaches to Leadership: An Integrative Review of Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership (2019) · cites this paper as Haidt, 2001
In the citing paper
“Influential theories in psychology maintain that our moral sense is shaped by the social world (1)”
From Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Most existing research takes a dyadic perspective to study the social transmission of morality; typically, one person (such as a child) is exposed to another's ideas (e.g., parent) through behavior or communication (1,2).”
From Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“As noted, other research suggests that moral judgments are often based on moral intuitions or heuristics [1], leading to quick and simple judgments.”
From The Importance of Moral Construal: Moral versus Non-Moral Construal Elicits Faster, More Extreme, Universal Evaluations of the Same Actions (2012) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, disgust also affects our moral judgment [38,40,42].”
From Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition (2015) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“This caveat might have contributed to the similar results in the meta-analyses on moral cognition and on ToM (rather than on empathy), given that emotion processing is thought to play a paramount role in real-world moral cognition (Krebs 2008; Tangney et al. 2007; Haidt 2001).”
From Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy (2012) · cites this paper as Haidt 2001
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The Social Construction of Reality
Rose, D. M., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/323448 · Cited by 13,850
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things
Lakoff, G. P. (1987) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 · Cited by 13,358
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 7×
“To say that moral reasoning is a conscious process means that the process is intentional, effortful, and controllable and that the reasoner is aware that it is going on (Bargh, 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
(1994) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,542
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Black, 1998, Neuronal plasticity and the developing brain., 31
- Chen, 1999, The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context., 73
- D'Andrade, 1984, Cultural meaning systems., 88
- Darwin, 1998, The descent of man.
- de Waal, 1982, Chimpanzee politics.
- Frijda, 1986, The emotions.
- Hare, 1993, Without conscience.
- Harrison, 1967, Ethical objectivism., Vols. 3-4, 71
- Huttenlocher, 1994, Synaptogenesis, synapse elimination, and neural plasticity in human cerebral cortex., Vol. 27, 35
- Kagan, 1984, The nature of the child.
- Kant, 1959, Foundation of the metaphysics of morals (L. W. Beck. Trans.).
- Kohlberg, 1969, Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization., 347
- Lapsley, 1996, Moral psychology.
- Margolis, 1987, Patterns, thinking, and cognition.
- Mednick, 1982, Biology and violence., 21
- Mischel, 1976, A cognitive social-learning approach to morality and self-regulation., 84
- Newcomb, 1943, Personality and social change: Attitude formation in a student community.
- Pavlov, 1927, Conditioned reflexes.
- Perkins, 1983, Difficulties in everyday reasoning., 177
- Premack, 1995, Origins of human social competence., 205
- Rozin, 2000, Disgust., 637
- Shweder, 1997, The "big three" of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the "big three" explanations of suffering., 119
- Singer, 1994, Rethinking life and death.
- Solomon, 1993, The philosophy of emotions., 3
- Solomon, 1991, A terror management theory of social behavior., 93
- Williams, 1967, Rationalism., Vols. 7-8, 69
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 8,792
Sevinc, G., & Spreng, R. N. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087427 · Cited by 92
Hawley, P. H. (2014) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721414548417 · Cited by 92
Peer effects, motivation, and learning
Eisenkopf, G. (2009) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.08.005 · Cited by 92
Concepts and implications of altruism bias and pathological altruism
Oakley, B. A. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1302547110 · Cited by 91
The arousal model of moral condemnation
Cheng, J. S., Ottati, V., & Price, E. D. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.06.006 · Cited by 91
Preschoolers' moral judgments of environmental harm and the influence of perspective taking
Hahn, E. R., & Garrett, M. K. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.05.004 · Cited by 91
Do people care if men don't care about caring? The asymmetry in support for changing gender roles
Block, K., Croft, A., Souza, L. D., & Schmader, T. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.03.013 · Cited by 91
Cognitive control increases honesty in cheaters but cheating in those who are honest
Speer, S. P. H., Smidts, A., & Boksem, M. A. S. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2003480117 · Cited by 91
The Problem of Purity in Moral Psychology
Gray, K. J., DiMaggio, N., Schein, C., & Kachanoff, F. J. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683221124741 · Cited by 91
The role of moral knowledge in everyday immorality: What does it matter if I know what is right?
Reynolds, S. J., Dang, C. T., Yam, K. C., & Leavitt, K. (2014) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.10.008 · Cited by 91
Two paths to blame: Intentionality directs moral information processing along two distinct tracks.
Monroe, A. E., & Malle, B. F. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000234 · Cited by 91
Moral development at the crossroads: New trends and possible futures.
Lapsley, D. K., & Carlo, G. (2014) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035225 · Cited by 90
Capraro, V., & Cococcioni, G. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep27219 · Cited by 90
The Legacy Motive: A Catalyst for Sustainable Decision Making in Organizations
Fox, M. J., Tost, L. P., & Wade‐Benzoni, K. A. (2010) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq201020214 · Cited by 90
Counterfeit Luxuries: Does Moral Reasoning Strategy Influence Consumers’ Pursuit of Counterfeits?
Chen, J., Teng, L., & Liao, Y. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3255-y · Cited by 90
Business Ethics: The Promise of Neuroscience
Robertson, D. C., Voegtlin, C., & Maak, T. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3312-6 · Cited by 90
Applying Moral Foundations Theory to the Explanation of Capital Jurors’ Sentencing Decisions
Vaughan, T. J., Holleran, L. B., & Silver, J. R. (2019) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418825.2018.1537400 · Cited by 90
How Emotions Shape Moral Behavior: Some Answers (and Questions) for the Field of Moral Psychology
Teper, R., Zhong, C., & Inzlicht, M. (2015) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12154 · Cited by 90
Justice Sensitivity and the Processing of Justice–Related Information
Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M., Staubach, M., & Schmitt, M. (2010) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.800 · Cited by 90
Batson, C. D. (2011) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073911402380 · Cited by 90
What Makes Moral Disgust Special? An Integrative Functional Review
Giner‐Sorolla, R., Kupfer, T. R., & Sabo, J. S. (2017) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.10.001 · Cited by 90
Perceived psychological distance, construal processes, and abstractness of entrepreneurial action
Chen, H. S., Mitchell, R. K., Brigham, K. H., Howell, R. D., & Steinbauer, R. (2018) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.01.001 · Cited by 90
Abstraction increases hypocrisy
Lammers, J. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.006 · Cited by 90
Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines
Bago, B., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/29b4j · Cited by 593
A liberal realist answer to debunking skeptics: the empirical case for realism
Huemer, M. (2015) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-015-0588-9 · Cited by 89
Moral dimensions of human–wildlife conflict
Lute, M. L., Navarrete, C. D., Nelson, M. P., & Gore, M. L. (2016) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12731 · Cited by 89
Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979754 · Cited by 90
Telkamp, J. B., & Anderson, M. H. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05057-6 · Cited by 89
An Experimental Investigation of Emotions and Reasoning in the Trolley Problem
Lanteri, A., Chelini, C., & Rizzello, S. (2008) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9665-8 · Cited by 89
Having Our Dogs and Eating Them Too: Why Animals Are a Social Issue
Serpell, J. A. (2009) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01617.x · Cited by 89
Anthropology in Cognitive Science
Bender, A., Hutchins, E. L., & Medin, D. L. (2010) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01082.x · Cited by 89
Hamilton vs. Kant: pitting adaptations for altruism against adaptations for moral judgment
Kurzban, R., DeScioli, P., & Fein, D. (2012) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.11.002 · Cited by 89
Jordan, A., & Monin, B. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02161.x · Cited by 89
Capraro, V., & Cococcioni, G. (2015) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.0237 · Cited by 89
Causal Conceptions in Social Explanation and Moral Evaluation
Alicke, M. D., Mandel, D. R., Hilton, D., Gerstenberg, T., & Lagnado, D. A. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615601888 · Cited by 89
Miller, P., Flores, A. R., Haider‐Markel, D. P., Lewis, D. C., Tadlock, B. L., & Taylor, J. K. (2017) · Politics Groups and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2016.1260482 · Cited by 89
Khan, Z., Soundararajan, V., Wood, G., & Ahammad, M. F. (2017) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2017.06.009 · Cited by 89
Meatless meals and masculinity: How veg* men explain their plant-based diets
Mycek, M. K. (2018) · Food and Foodways · doi:10.1080/07409710.2017.1420355 · Cited by 90
Using Social and Behavioural Science to Support COVID-19 Pandemic ResponsePreprint
Bavel, J. J. V., D, K. B. A., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A. K., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., et al. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4178356 · Cited by 89
The logic of universalization guides moral judgment
Levine, S., Kleiman-Weiner, M., Schulz, L., Tenenbaum, J., & Cushman, F. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2014505117 · Cited by 88
Lieberman, D., Oum, R. E., & Kurzban, R. (2008) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.528 · Cited by 88
Outcome-oriented moral evaluation in terrorists
Báez, S., Herrera, E., García, A. M., Manes, F. F., Young, L., & Ibáñez, A. M. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0118 · Cited by 88
Management dynamics in the knowledge economy
Amelio, S. (2016) · Cited by 88
Effects of incidental emotions on moral dilemma judgments: An analysis using the CNI model.
Gawronski, B., Conway, P. J., Armstrong, J., Friesdorf, R., & Hütter, M. (2018) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000399 · Cited by 88
Julmi, C. (2019) · BuR - Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-019-0096-4 · Cited by 88
Evolutionary Psychology, Moral Heuristics, and the Law
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2006) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3488.003.0012 · Cited by 88
Díaz, R., & Cova, F. (2021) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2021.1941783 · Cited by 88
Neural networks underlying implicit and explicit moral evaluations in psychopathy
Yoder, K. J., Harenski, C. L., Kiehl, K. A., & Decety, J. (2015) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2015.117 · Cited by 88
Moral Intelligence – A Framework for Understanding Moral Competences
Tanner, C., & Christen, M. (2013) · Library of ethics and applied philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01369-5_7 · Cited by 88
Moral Concerns and Policy Attitudes: Investigating the Influence of Elite Rhetoric
Clifford, S., Jerit, J., Rainey, C., & Motyl, M. S. (2015) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.944320 · Cited by 88
Moral judgment as information processing: an integrative review
Guglielmo, S. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01637 · Cited by 88
Challenges for the sequential two-system model of moral judgement
Gürçay, B., & Baron, J. (2016) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2016.1216011 · Cited by 88
Knoll, M. S., Wegge, J., Unterrainer, C., da Silva, S. A., & Jønsson, T. (2016) · German Journal of Human Resource Management Zeitschrift für Personalforschung · doi:10.1177/2397002216649857 · Cited by 88
Hauser, M. D. (2006) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsl026 · Cited by 87
Laurent, S. M., Clark, B. A., Walker, S., & Wiseman, K. D. (2013) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.801339 · Cited by 87
Philosophy's New Challenge: Experiments and Intentional Action
Pinillos, N. Á., Smith, N., NAIR, G. S., Marchetto, P. M., & Mun, C. (2011) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01412.x · Cited by 87
What Happens to Bad Actors in Organizations? A Review of Actor-Centric Outcomes of Negative Behavior
Zhong, R., & Robinson, S. L. (2020) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320976808 · Cited by 87
Reanalysing the factor structure of the moral foundations questionnaire
Harper, C. A., & Rhodes, D. (2021) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12452 · Cited by 87
The social psychology of intergroup tolerance and intolerance
Verkuyten, M., Yogeeswaran, K., & Adelman, L. (2022) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2022.2091326 · Cited by 87
Can digital investment improve corporate environmental performance? -- Empirical evidence from China
Jin, X., Lei, X., & Wu, W. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137669 · Cited by 87
Ethics Problems and Problems with Ethics: Toward a Pro-Management Theory
Donaldson, L. (2007) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9336-6 · Cited by 87
The social and ethical consequences of a calculative mindset
Wang, L., Zhong, C., & Murnighan, J. K. (2014) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.05.004 · Cited by 87
Moral Stress: Considering the Nature and Effects of Managerial Moral Uncertainty
Reynolds, S. J., Owens, B. P., & Rubenstein, A. L. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1013-8 · Cited by 87
Hubris in leadership: A peril of unbridled intuition?
Claxton, G. L., Owen, D. A., & Sadler‐Smith, E. (2013) · Leadership · doi:10.1177/1742715013511482 · Cited by 89
Moral Foundations, Intuitions of Justice, and the Intricacies of Punitive Sentiment
Silver, J. R. (2017) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.1111/lasr.12264 · Cited by 87
Lu, Y., & Lee, J. K. (2019) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699018811295 · Cited by 86
The functional brain architecture of human morality
Funk, C. M., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2009) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2009.09.011 · Cited by 86
Paradoxes and Dual Processes: A Review and Synthesis
Keller, J., & Sadler‐Smith, E. (2019) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12200 · Cited by 66
Citizen views on genome editing: effects of species and purpose
Busch, G., Ryan, E. B., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., & Weary, D. M. (2021) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-021-10235-9 · Cited by 86
The moral foundations hypothesis does not replicate well in Black samples.
Davis, D. E., Rice, K. G., Tongeren, D. R. V., Hook, J. N., DeBlaere, C., Worthington, E. L., & Choe, E. J. Y. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000056 · Cited by 86
Punishment without reason: Isolating retribution in lay punishment of criminal offenders.
Aharoni, E., & Fridlund, A. J. (2011) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037/a0025821 · Cited by 86
Harm mediates the disgust-immorality link.
Schein, C., Ritter, R. S., & Gray, K. J. (2016) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000167 · Cited by 86
Hopkins, P. D. (2015) · Journal of Integrative Agriculture · doi:10.1016/s2095-3119(14)60883-2 · Cited by 86
In defense of the ivory tower: Why philosophers should stay out of politics
van der Vossen, B. (2014) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2014.972353 · Cited by 85
Swartwood, J. D. (2012) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-012-9367-2 · Cited by 86
Developmental stages, Piagetian stages in particular: A critical review
Lourenço, O. M. (2015) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.08.002 · Cited by 85
Information, beliefs, and motivation: The antecedents to human resource attributions
Hewett, R., Shantz, A. D., & Mundy, J. (2019) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2353 · Cited by 85
A Humean theory of moral intuition
Kauppinen, A. (2013) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00455091.2013.857136 · Cited by 85
Woodyatt, L., & Wenzel, M. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.016 · Cited by 85
Moral judgments in social dilemmas: How bad is free riding?
Cubitt, R., Drouvelis, M., Gächter, S., & Kabalin, R. (2010) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.10.011 · Cited by 85
Are We More Moral Than We Think?
Teper, R., Inzlicht, M., & Page‐Gould, E. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611402513 · Cited by 85
Handbook on energy and climate change
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-2773 · Cited by 85
Conservation Research, Policy and Practice
Sutherland, W. J., Brotherton, P. N. M., Ockendon, N., Pettorelli, N., Vickery, J. A., Davies, Z. G., Boyd, I., Wintle, B. C., Kennicutt, M. C., II, Altringham, J. D., et al. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108638210 · Cited by 84
Morton, K. R., Worthley, J. S., Testerman, J. K., & Mahoney, M. L. (2006) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240600874653 · Cited by 84
Storbeck, J., Robinson, M. D., & McCourt, M. E. (2006) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.10.1.41 · Cited by 84
Sound morality: Irritating and icky noises amplify judgments in divergent moral domains
Seidel, A., & PRINZ, J. J. (2013) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.004 · Cited by 84
Criteria for basic emotions: Is DISGUST a primary “emotion”?
Panksepp, J. (2007) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930701334302 · Cited by 84
Moral Empathy Gaps and the American Culture War
Ditto, P. H., & Koleva, S. P. (2011) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073911402393 · Cited by 84
The omission effect in moral cognition: toward a functional explanation
DeScioli, P., Bruening, R., & Kurzban, R. (2011) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.01.003 · Cited by 84
The emotional foundations of high moral intelligence
Narvaez, D. F. (2010) · New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development · doi:10.1002/cd.276 · Cited by 84
Interpretations and methods: Towards a more effectively self-correcting social psychology
Jussim, L. J., Crawford, J. T., Anglin, S. M., Stevens, S. T., & Duarte, J. L. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.003 · Cited by 84
Cognitive Neuroscience and the Structure of the Moral Mind
Greene, J. D. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179675.003.0019 · Cited by 84
Moral judgments of human vs. robot agents
Voiklis, J., Kim, B., Cusimano, C., & Malle, B. F. (2016) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2016.7745207 · Cited by 84
The Heart of Judgment: Practical Wisdom, Neuroscience, and Narrative
Thiele, L. P. (2006) · Cited by 84
Ståhl, T., Zaal, M. P., & Skitka, L. J. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166332 · Cited by 83
The Emotional Dog Gets Mistaken for a Possum
Haidt, J. (2004) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.283 · Cited by 83
Self-citationHuman Behavior in Military Contexts
National Research Council (2008) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/12023 · Cited by 83
Public Opinion on Geopolitics and Trade
Carnegie, A. S., & Gaikwad, N. (2017) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887121000265 · Cited by 83
Towards a new paradigm of moral personhood
Frimer, J. A., & Walker, L. J. (2008) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240802227494 · Cited by 83
Salerno, J. M., & Bottoms, B. L. (2009) · Behavioral Sciences & the Law · doi:10.1002/bsl.861 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Haidt, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Haidt, Jonathan
- ORCID
- Haidt, Jonathan
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 814-834
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2123791568
- Semantic Scholar
- b74e8da297574fd071d4b48b7aa94ea16861aea6
- Cited by
- 8,048
- References
- 254
- Citations by year
- 2026: 365 · 2025: 479 · 2024: 360 · 2023: 447 · 2022: 497 · 2021: 468 · 2020: 535 · 2019: 511 · 2018: 405 · 2017: 401 · 2016: 408 · 2015: 416 · 2014: 436 · 2013: 433 · 2012: 369
- FWCI
- 16.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r03da012606-01)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (1-RO3-DA12606-01)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- moral judgment, moral reasoning, social intuitionism, moral intuitions, automated assessment, evolutionary psychology of morality
- MeSH terms
- Emotions, Humans, Morals, Problem Solving, Social Perception, Social Values, Intuition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
