Cited by 523Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismMemory Processes and InfluencesLanguage Development and Disorders

Implicit learning of synthetic languages: The role of instructional set.

Reber, Arthur S.·1976·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-7393.2.1.88

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reber, A. S.
Affiliations
City University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Reber, Arthur S.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Published
1976-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
88-94
ISSN
0096-1515 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996103427
Cited by
523
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
implicit learning, synthetic languages, instructional set, artificial language learning, second language acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review