CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 94Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentYouth, Drugs, and Violence

A prospective test of the negative affect model of substance abuse: Moderating effects of social support.

Measelle, Jeffrey R., Stice, Eric, Springer, David W.·2006·Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
DOI 10.1037/0893-164x.20.3.225
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The authors tested whether dimensions of negative affect--specifically, trait levels of negative emotionality and state levels of depressive symptoms--increased risk for substance abuse onset and whether perceived social support moderated this relation using data from a 5-year prospective study of 496 school-recruited adolescent girls. Initial negative emotionality, but not depressive symptoms, and deficits in parental, but not peer, support predicted future substance abuse onset in a multivariate hazard model. Tests of the interaction between negative affect dimensions and social support suggested that support did not moderate the relation of negative affect to risk for substance abuse onset. Results provide prospective support for the etiological role in the onset of substance abuse of trait-linked negative affect and of parental support.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0893-164x.20.3.225

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OT released during withdrawal may mitigate withdrawal symptoms and decrease probability of relapse, which could explain consolation-seeking during break-ups and social support's positive outcomes in drug addiction.

    “OT released during the withdrawal period may act to mitigate withdrawal symptoms and decrease the probability of relapse, which could explain both consolation-seeking behavior during break-ups, and the strong ability of social support to promote positive outcomes in drug addiction (Wills and Cleary 1996; Measelle et al 2006).”

    From The behavioral, anatomical and pharmacological parallels between social attachment, love and addiction (2012) · cites this paper as Measelle et al 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Measelle, J. R., Stice, E., & Springer, D. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
ORCID
Venue
Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2006
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
225-233
ISSN
  • 0893-164X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1501
DOI
10.1037/0893-164x.20.3.225
OpenAlex
W2103349661
Cited by
94
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (MH01708, MH/DK61957)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
Keywords
negative affect, negative affectivity, depressive symptoms, social support, parental support, peer support, adolescent girls, risk factors, moderation, substance use prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Child, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Social Support, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review