Cited by 174Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

What is working memory capacity?

Engle, Randall W.·2004·The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/10394-016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Engle, R. W.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Engle, Randall W.
Venue
The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder.
Published
2004-10-27
Pages
297-314
OpenAlex
W2497320563
Cited by
174
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
32.69
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
working memory capacity, working memory, cognitive ability, individual differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review