Cited by 624Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesGambling Behavior and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hyperbolic temporal discounting in social drinkers and problem drinkers.

Vuchinich, Rudy E., Simpson, Cathy A.·1998·Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Two studies compared participants, distinguished by their typical alcohol consumption, on the degree to which they discounted the value of delayed, hypothetical amounts of money. Heavy social drinkers in Study 1 and problem drinkers in Study 2 both showed greater temporal discounting than light social drinkers; this difference was stronger in Study 2. Both studies found that a hyperbolic function described temporal discounting more accurately than an exponential function. These results are consistent with extending behavioral theories of intertemporal choice to characterize the determinants of alcohol consumption. The discounting differences also are consistent with more general behavioral economic and economic theories of addiction, although the hyperbolic functional form is inconsistent with the exponential discounting function in economic theory. The drinker groups also differed on impulsiveness and time orientation questionnaires, with light drinkers being less impulsive and more future oriented; however, these measures were not strongly correlated with the measure of temporal discounting.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1064-1297.6.3.292

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 624

Metadata

Authors
Vuchinich, R. E., & Simpson, C. A.
Affiliations
Auburn University (US)
Venue
Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
1998-08
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
292-305
ISSN
  • 1064-1297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-2293
OpenAlex
W2079478738
Cited by
624
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 42
FWCI
11.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
hyperbolic discounting, delay discounting, problem drinking, social drinking, alcohol consumption, intertemporal choice, impulsivity, time orientation, addiction, delayed rewards, exponential discounting
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alabama, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholic Intoxication, Demography, Female, Humans, Income, Male, Models, Psychological, Personality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review