Cited by 70Education, Achievement, and GiftednessCognitive Abilities and TestingSchool Choice and Performance

Aptitude development and education.

Snow, Richard E.·1996·Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1076-8971.2.3-4.536

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior reviews of educational effects on intelligence are exclusively narrative.

    “However, this and several newer reviews (Deary & Johnson, 2010;Gustaffson, 2001;Snow, 1996;Winship & Korenman, 1997) are all exclusively narrative.”

    From How Much Does Education Improve Intelligence? A Meta-Analysis (2018) · cites this paper as Snow, 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Snow, R. E.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Snow, Richard E.
Venue
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
Published
1996-09
Volume
2
Issue
3-4
Pages
536-560
ISSN
  • 1076-8971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1528
OpenAlex
W2057822196
Cited by
70
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology Public Policy and Law (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
aptitude, intelligence, talent development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review