The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The curse of expertise: The effects of expertise and debiasing methods on prediction of novice performance.
Abstract
Experts are often called on to predict the performance of novices, but cognitive heuristics may interfere with experts' ability to capitalize on their superior knowledge hi predicting novice task performance. In Study 1, experts, intermediate users, and novices predicted the time it would take novices to complete a complex task. In Study 2, expertise was experimentally manipulated. In both studies, those with more expertise were worse predictors of novice performance times and were resistant to debiasing techniques intended to reduce underestimation. Findings from these studies suggest that experts may have a cognitive handicap that leads to underestimating the difficulty novices face and that those with an intermediate level of expertise may be more accurate in predicting novices' performance. Organizations often rely on experts to predict the performance of novices. Project managers predict team members' times to complete new work assignments. Marketers and designers predict consumers' abilities to master the use of new products. Teachers predict students' efforts to complete homework and finish exams. The predictions of experts influence the allocation of time and resources to projects, decisions about product design, and the pacing of students' lessons. Predictive errors can have significant negative consequences: employee alienation, failure to meet project deadlines, consumer dissatisfaction, and student frustration or boredom. This study draws on the literature in cognitive heuristics to explore whether experts, as compared with those with less expertise and novices themselves, are more or less accurate in predicting the perfor
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“experts tend to forget how they learned what they know, underestimate the work involved in a given task, and thus sometimes struggle to teach novices.”
From Large language models and the problem of rhetorical debt (2025) · cites this paper as Hinds 1999
Citations
Cites
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984 · cited 1×
“The availability heuristic is a cognitive shortcut in which people make predictions on the basis of the information that they have readily available in memory ( Tversky & Kahneman, 1973 ).”
BackgroundUnrealistic optimism about future life events
Weinstein, N. D. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806 · Cited by 4,999
Acquisition of cognitive skill
Anderson, J. R. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.4.369 · Cited by 3,663
Solso, R. L., & Chase, W. G. (1974) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421395 · Cited by 2,134
Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems
Larkin, J., McDermott, J. P., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.208.4450.1335 · Cited by 2,112
Expert performance: its structure and acquisition.
Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.8.725 · Cited by 2,072
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Visual Information Processing · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-170150-5.50011-1 · Cited by 1,419
Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1982) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809477.031 · Cited by 1,162
Exploring the "planning fallacy": Why people underestimate their task completion times.
Buehler, R., Griffin, D. W., & Ross, M. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.366 · Cited by 1,105
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 398
Lexical Entrainment in Written Discourse: Is Experts' Word Use Adapted to the Addressee?
Jucks, R., Becker, B.-M., & Bromme, R. (2008) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638530802356547 · Cited by 42
Poor writing, not specialized concepts, drives processing difficulty in legal language
Martínez, E., Mollica, F., & Gibson, E. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105070 · Cited by 39
“Similar to the “curse of knowledge” (Hinds, 1999; Nickerson, 1999), they may not realize that their language is too complicated for the average reader to understand (Azuelos-Atias, 2018).”
Adaptive Generation in Dialogue Systems Using Dynamic User Modeling
Janarthanam, S., & Lemon, O. (2014) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00203 · Cited by 39
Perspectives on Perspective Taking
Birch, S., Li, V., Haddock, T., Ghrear, S. E., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., Baimel, A., & Whyte, M. I. (2016) · Advances in child development and behavior · doi:10.1016/bs.acdb.2016.10.005 · Cited by 40
Mannucci, P. V. (2017) · Organ. Sci. · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1141 · Cited by 15
User expertise in contemporary information systems: Conceptualization, measurement and application
Sedera, D., & Dey, S. (2013) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2013.07.004 · Cited by 37
Misperceiving the value of information in predicting the performance of others
Loewenstein, G. F., Moore, D. A., & Weber, R. A. (2006) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-006-9128-y · Cited by 37
“with intermediate levels of experience when it came to predicting how long it would take novices to learn the basics of using the headset (Hinds, 1999).”
The Efficacy of Prototyping Under Time Constraints
Dow, S. P., & Klemmer, S. R. (2011) · Design Thinking · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13757-0_7 · Cited by 35
The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences
Gilovich, T. D., Vallone, R. P., & Tversky, A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.035 · Cited by 39
Recognition-based inference: When is less more in the real world?
Pachur, T. (2010) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.17.4.589 · Cited by 35
When Experts Argue: Explaining the Best and the Worst of Reasoning
Mercier, H. (2011) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-011-9222-y · Cited by 40
Jansen, T., Vögelin, C., Machts, N., Keller, S., Köller, O., & Møller, J. (2020) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2020.103216 · Cited by 37
The errors of experts: When expertise hinders effective provision and seeking of advice and feedback
Zhang, T., Harrington, K. B., & Sherf, E. N. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.011 · Cited by 35
“People often seek out experts for advice and feedback, yet the cognitive entrenchment and lack of perspective taking associated with expertise is often a “curse” [15, 16] that prevents experts from providing advice and feedback effectively.”
BackgroundPersistence through function preservation
Rosé, D. (2014) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0555-6 · Cited by 37
Intuition Fail: Philosophical Activity and the Limits of Expertise
Buckwalter, W. (2014) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.12147 · Cited by 35
Evaluation of postural-assist exoskeleton for manual material handling
Ogunseiju, O. R., Olayiwola, J., Akanmu, A. A., & Olatunji, O. A. (2021) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-07-2020-0491 · Cited by 34
Wittwer, J., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2010) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9118-7 · Cited by 34
“Hinds (1999) showed that experts who were asked to predict the time novices needed to perform an unfamiliar task overestimated how quickly novices were able to do so.”
BackgroundPerformance-Based Data in the Study of STEM Ph.D. Education
Feldon, D. F., Maher, M., & Timmerman, B. E. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1191269 · Cited by 34
Tecnoscienza. Italian Journal of Science and Technology Studies
Pelizza, A. (2018) · Cited by 35
Siddiqui, R. A., May, F. B., & Monga, A. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.002 · Cited by 33
The return trip effect: Why the return trip often seems to take less time
van de Ven, N., van Rijswijk, L., & Roy, M. M. (2011) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0150-5 · Cited by 33
Wittwer, J., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9021-x · Cited by 32
Effects of team cognition and constraint on new product ideation
Hirunyawipada, T., & Paswan, A. K. (2012) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.04.014 · Cited by 31
Brøgger, M. N., & Zethsen, K. K. (2021) · Linguistica Antverpiensia New Series – Themes in Translation Studies · doi:10.52034/lanstts.v11i.295 · Cited by 31
Learning Down to Train Up: Mentors Are More Effective When They Value Insights from Below
Zhang, T., Wang, D. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2022) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2021.0430 · Cited by 39
Perspectives on prediction: Does third-person imagery improve task completion estimates?
Buehler, R., Griffin, D., Lam, K. C. H., & Deslauriers, J. (2011) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.09.001 · Cited by 29
Impact of Secondary Students’ Content Knowledge on Their Communication Skills in Science
Kulgemeyer, C. (2016) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-016-9762-6 · Cited by 29
Yen, Y.-C. G., Kim, J. O., & Bailey, B. P. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376380 · Cited by 34
An Economic Model of the Planning Fallacy
Brunnermeier, M., Papakonstantinou, F., & Parker, J. A. (2008) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w14228 · Cited by 27
“Kahneman and Tversky (1979) argue that the fallacy arises because people ignore distributional information available in related past outcomes and instead focus only an a single plausible scenario for completion of the current specific task.”
InfluentialSullivan, M. E. (2020) · Journal of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1002/jso.25922 · Cited by 28
STEM High Schools Teachers’ Belief Regarding STEM Student Giftedness
Tofel‐Grehl, C., & Callahan, C. M. (2016) · Gifted Child Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0016986216673712 · Cited by 26
“This concern resonates with empirical evidence that individuals with advanced expertise have greater difficulty accurately assessing the learning needs of novices and routinely overestimate their students’ levels of knowledge and ability (Hinds, 1999; Nickerson, 1999).”
BackgroundThe Making of an Expert Detective. Thinking and Deciding in Criminal Investigations
Fahsing, I. (2016) · BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.29210.44482 · Cited by 27
Thoms, C., Degenhart, A., & Wohlgemuth, K. (2019) · Journal of Business and Technical Communication · doi:10.1177/1050651919892312 · Cited by 25
“Such unconscious writing processes can occur, for example, when the “curse of knowledge” or “curse of expertise” causes experts to underestimate the difficulty of a subject because of their own knowledge on the matter (Camerer, Loewenstein, & Weber, 1989; Hinds, 1999).”
Using Collaborative Filtering Algorithms as eLearning Tools
Loll, F., & Niels Pinkwart, C. (2009) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2009.492 · Cited by 25
Exploring Real-Time Collaboration in Crowd-Powered Systems Through a UI Design Tool
Lee, S. W., Krosnick, R., Park, S. Y., Keelean, B., Vaidya, S., O’Keefe, S. D., & Lasecki, W. S. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274373 · Cited by 25
“They might have underestimated the difficulties that non-expert crowd workers would face [24], especially given that the designers could have finished the prototype more quickly than the workers.”
BackgroundThe Effects of Previous Misestimation of Task Duration on Estimating Future Task Duration
König, C. J., Wirz, A., Thomas, K., & Weidmann, R.-Z. (2014) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-014-9236-3 · Cited by 24
“Following Hinds (1999) and Roy (2003), participants had to piece together the 81-piece bird of prey figure from the LEGO® Creator Set “Wild animals” (No. 4884-1).”
MethodArguments from Expert Opinion and Persistent Bias
Mizrahi, M. (2017) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-017-9434-x · Cited by 24
“…studies report that expert judgments exhibit cognitive biases that novice judgments do not: Experts are susceptible to “ the curse of knowledge , a bias whereby knowledgeable people are unable to ignore information they hold that others do not” (Hinds 1999, p. 206; emphasis in original).”
BackgroundCamara, N., Xu, D., & Binyet, E. M. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.128 · Cited by 25
Nückles, M., & Bromme, R. (2002) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1026//1618-3169.49.4.292 · Cited by 24
Understanding and Reducing the Knowledge Effect: Implications for Writers
Hayes, J. R., & Bajzek, D. (2007) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088307311209 · Cited by 24
Pandey, V., Amir, A., Debelius, J. W., Hyde, E. R., Kościółek, T., Knight, R. D., & Klemmer, S. (2017) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025769 · Cited by 24
On the validity of peer grading and a cloud teaching assistant system
Vogelsang, T., & Ruppertz, L. (2015) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge · doi:10.1145/2723576.2723633 · Cited by 31
On the folly of principal's power: Managerial psychology as a cause of bad incentives
Magee, J. C., Kilduff, G. J., & Heath, C. (2011) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2011.09.002 · Cited by 23
How Good Are Fast and Frugal Heuristics?
Gigerenzer, G., Czerlinski, J., & Martignon, L. F. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.033 · Cited by 24
Winners and Losers in the Folk Epistemology of LotteriesPreprint
Turri, J., & Friedman, O. (2020) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/37uw9 · Cited by 23
Supporting Training of Expertise with Wearable Technologies: The WEKIT Reference Framework
Limbu, B. H., Fominykh, M., Klemke, R., Specht, M. M., & Wild, F. (2017) · Perspectives on rethinking and reforming education · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-6144-8_10 · Cited by 23
Decision-Making Biases and Cyber Attackers
Johnson, C. K., Gutzwiller, R. S., Gervais, J., & Ferguson-Walter, K. J. (2021) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops (ASEW) · doi:10.1109/asew52652.2021.00038 · Cited by 25
Herppich, S., Wittwer, J., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2013) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2012.699900 · Cited by 21
Experts’ Explanations Engage Novices in Deep-Processing
Lachner, A., & Nückles, M. (2013) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 21
Transitions and the development of expertise
Hallam, S. (2010) · Vernon Wall Lecture · doi:10.53841/bpsvern.2010.1.29.1 · Cited by 21
Managing cognitive biases during disaster response: the development of an aide memoire
Brooks, B., Curnin, S., Owen, C., & Bearman, C. (2019) · Cognition Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-019-00564-5 · Cited by 26
Influence of proficiency level and constraints on viewpoint switching: a study in web design
Chevalier, A., & Chevalier, N. (2008) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1448 · Cited by 23
Lurati, F., & Eppler, M. J. (2006) · HOPE (Hauptbibliothek Open Publishing Environment) (University of Zurich) · doi:10.5169/seals-791109 · Cited by 21
The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning as a Subversive Activity
Boose, D. L., & Hutchings, P. (2016) · Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal · doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.1.6 · Cited by 21
“…on making and using graphs; or Wineburg, 2001, on how historians read primary sources), and it can be difficult for them to recall what it is like to be a novice learner (see Hinds, 1999, on “the curse of expertise,” and Middendorf & Pace, 2004, on the usefulness of “decoding the disciplines”).”
BackgroundResistance of Personal Risk Perceptions to Debiasing Interventions
Weinstein, N. D., & Klein, W. M. P. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.019 · Cited by 24
Avoiding Simplicity, Confronting Complexity
Clarebout, G., & Ellen, J. L. B. (2006) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789087901189 · Cited by 21
Specialists over generalists?: Examining discursive closures and openings in expert collaborations
Woo, D., Pierce, C., & Treem, J. W. (2021) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2021.1950917 · Cited by 20
Steinheider, B., Bayerl, P. S., Menold, N., & Bromme, R. (2009) · Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O · doi:10.1026/0932-4089.53.3.121 · Cited by 20
The Weighing of Evidence and the Determinants of Confidence
Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.015 · Cited by 20
How Early-Life Resource Scarcity Influences Self-Confidence and Task Completion Judgments
Mittal, C., Laran, J., & Griskevicius, V. (2020) · Journal of the Association for Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/709884 · Cited by 19
How Experts Adapt Their Gaze Behavior When Modeling a Task to Novices
Emhardt, S. N., Kok, E. M., Jarodzka, H. M., Brand‐Gruwel, S., Drumm, C., & van Gog, T. (2020) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12893 · Cited by 19
“Moreover, they may have difficulties in correctly assessing novices’ prior knowledge (Hinds, 1999).”
Actors, observers, and the estimation of task duration
Roy, M. M., Christenfeld, N. J. S., & Jones, M. (2012) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.699973 · Cited by 19
“Three other studies (Byram, 1997; Hinds, 1999; Jørgensen, 2004), found no difference in bias between actors and observers predicting time needed to complete a task.”
InfluentialNückles, M., & Stürz, A. (2004) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.021 · Cited by 19
Making Better Decisions [Modeling the Assistive Technology Assessment]
Simpson, R. C. (2008) · IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine · doi:10.1109/emb.2007.907394 · Cited by 18
Theory-Driven Reasoning about Plausible Pasts and Probable Futures in World Politics
Tetlock, P. E. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.044 · Cited by 18
Understanding novelty: how task structure and tool familiarity moderate performance
Tomasi, S. D., Schuff, D., & Turetken, O. (2018) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2018.1441325 · Cited by 21
“As experience increases and schemas are reinforced, routine behaviour is further developed into habit (Hinds 1999), where people perform certain behaviours automatically (Limayem, Hirt, and Cheung 2007).”
BackgroundTrinh, M. P. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02505 · Cited by 18
Emhardt, S. N., Jarodzka, H., Brand‐Gruwel, S., Drumm, C., Niehorster, D. C., & van Gog, T. (2022) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2022.2080831 · Cited by 19
“Second, experts have been found to experience difficulties assessing novices’ level of prior knowledge (Hinds, 1999).”
BackgroundInfluentialStructural Complexity and Effective Informing
Gill, G. (2008) · Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline · doi:10.28945/448 · Cited by 17
Jucks, R., Paus, E., & Bromme, R. (2012) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2012.01.011 · Cited by 17
At the temporary-permanent interface: Overcoming knowledge boundaries with boundary objects
Ojansivu, I. T., Kettunen, K., & Alajoutsijärvi, K. J. (2021) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2021.101150 · Cited by 16
Ostermann, A., Leuders, T., & Nückles, M. (2015) · Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik · doi:10.1007/s13138-015-0073-1 · Cited by 18
Learning Adaptive Referring Expression Generation Policies for Spoken Dialogue Systems
Janarthanam, S., & Lemon, O. (2010) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15573-4_4 · Cited by 16
Halkjelsvik, T., & Jørgensen, M. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-74953-2 · Cited by 25
A facilitated expert‐based approach to architecting “openable” complex systems
Szajnfarber, Z., & Vrolijk, A. (2018) · Systems Engineering · doi:10.1002/sys.21419 · Cited by 16
“They may see the problem differently 21 and this may lead to new solution paths.”
BackgroundEven lawyers do not like legalese
Martínez, E., Mollica, F., & Gibson, E. A. F. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2302672120 · Cited by 15
Chowdhury, P. D., & Haque, C. E. (2011) · Cited by 15
Are forensic scientists too risk averse?
Mannering, W. M., Vogelsang, M. D., Busey, T. A., & Mannering, F. (2021) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.14700 · Cited by 15
Nanotechnology framing in the Canadian national news media
Tyshenko, M. G. (2013) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.07.001 · Cited by 15
Municipalities on the Web: User-Friendliness of Government Information on the Internet
de Jong, M. D. T., & Lentz, L. R. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11823100_16 · Cited by 15
The temporal compression of events during episodic future thinking
Jeunehomme, O., Leroy, N., & D’Argembeau, A. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104416 · Cited by 14
Perspective Taking in Computer-Mediated Instructional Communication
Jucks, R., & Bromme, R. (2011) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000056 · Cited by 14
Jarodzka, H. M., Balslev, T., Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P. H., & Εika, B. (2010) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 14
Jensen, M. N. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.25949/19440980 · Cited by 14
Journalism as Model for Civic and Information Literacies
Smirnov, N., Saiyed, G., Easterday, M. W., & Lam, W. S. E. (2017) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2017.1392964 · Cited by 13
Latella, L. E., McAuley, R. J., & Rabinowitz, M. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15040620 · Cited by 13
Explaining with nonshared illustrations: How they constrain explanations
Jucks, R., Bromme, R., & Runde, A. (2007) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.006 · Cited by 13
Doctoral conceptual thresholds in cellular and molecular biology
Feldon, D. F., Rates, C. A., & Sun, C. (2017) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1395493 · Cited by 13
Audience Design von Experten in der netzgestützten Kommunikation:
Jucks, R., Bromme, R., & Runde, A. (2003) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1026//0044-3409.211.2.60 · Cited by 13
A Case for Feminism in Programming Language Design
Hermans, F., & Schlesinger, A. (2024) · ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software (Onward!) · doi:10.1145/3689492.3689809 · Cited by 17
“Furthermore, a creator of a system will, by building it, have so much more understanding of a system than any other users (even a user similar in gender, race and ability) that it becomes harder, over time, to identify with novice or casual users, a form of the ‘curse of expertise’ [61].”
When Reflection Hinders Creative Problem-Solving: a Test of Alternative Reflection Strategies
Rosseel, J., & Anseel, F. (2021) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-021-09741-8 · Cited by 12
Fischer, B., & Brøgger, M. N. (2012) · Cited by 12
Refining Situational Judgment Test Methods
Legree, P. J., & Psotka, J. (2006) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · Cited by 12
Marks, M. A. Z., & Arkes, H. R. (2008) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.632 · Cited by 12
Wang, L., Lin, J., Yan, J., & Cui, W. (2017) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-08-2016-0533 · Cited by 11
Professional Writers and Empathy: Exploring the Barriers to Anticipating Reader Problems
de Jong, M. D. T., & Lentz, L. R. (2007) · IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm) · doi:10.1109/ipcc.2007.4464058 · Cited by 11
ERP Effort Estimation Based on Expert Judgments
Erasmus, I. P., & Daneva, M. (2013) · Joint Conference of the International Workshop on Software Measurement and the International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement (IWSM-MENSURA) · doi:10.1109/iwsm-mensura.2013.25 · Cited by 11
Lima, G., Grgić-Hlača, N., & Redmiles, E. M. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713338 · Cited by 17
“…has identifed several psychological phenomena, such as the mere-exposure efect [93, 128], practice and learning efects [33], and the curse of knowledge [52], which lead us to hypothesize that participants’ evaluations may be infuenced by their interaction (or lack thereof) with the GenAI model.”
Faculty development strategies for overcoming the “curse of knowledge”
Froyd, J., & Layne, J. (2008) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie.2008.4720529 · Cited by 10
“In a study by Hinds, she showed that “those with more expertise were worse predictors of novice performance times and were resistant to debiasing techniques intended to reduce underestimation” [9].”
BackgroundFour More Years: Presidential Elections, Comparative Mindset, and Managerial Decisions
Xu, A. J., Moorman, C., Qin, V. Y., & Rao, A. R. (2019) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2017.0602 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Hinds, P. J.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hinds, Pamela J.
- ORCID
- Hinds, Pamela J.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 205-221
- ISSN
- 1076-898X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2192
- OpenAlex
- W2011381597
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 10.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- expertise, cognitive heuristics, bias mitigation, underestimation bias, expert opinion, task performance prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review