The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The curse of expertise: The effects of expertise and debiasing methods on prediction of novice performance.
Abstract
Experts are often called on to predict the performance of novices, but cognitive heuristics may interfere with experts' ability to capitalize on their superior knowledge hi predicting novice task performance. In Study 1, experts, intermediate users, and novices predicted the time it would take novices to complete a complex task. In Study 2, expertise was experimentally manipulated. In both studies, those with more expertise were worse predictors of novice performance times and were resistant to debiasing techniques intended to reduce underestimation. Findings from these studies suggest that experts may have a cognitive handicap that leads to underestimating the difficulty novices face and that those with an intermediate level of expertise may be more accurate in predicting novices' performance. Organizations often rely on experts to predict the performance of novices. Project managers predict team members' times to complete new work assignments. Marketers and designers predict consumers' abilities to master the use of new products. Teachers predict students' efforts to complete homework and finish exams. The predictions of experts influence the allocation of time and resources to projects, decisions about product design, and the pacing of students' lessons. Predictive errors can have significant negative consequences: employee alienation, failure to meet project deadlines, consumer dissatisfaction, and student frustration or boredom. This study draws on the literature in cognitive heuristics to explore whether experts, as compared with those with less expertise and novices themselves, are more or less accurate in predicting the perfor
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“experts tend to forget how they learned what they know, underestimate the work involved in a given task, and thus sometimes struggle to teach novices.”
From Large language models and the problem of rhetorical debt (2025) · cites this paper as Hinds 1999
Citations
Cites
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984 · cited 1×
“The availability heuristic is a cognitive shortcut in which people make predictions on the basis of the information that they have readily available in memory ( Tversky & Kahneman, 1973 ).”
BackgroundUnrealistic optimism about future life events
Weinstein, N. D. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806 · Cited by 4,999
Acquisition of cognitive skill
Anderson, J. R. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.4.369 · Cited by 3,663
Solso, R. L., & Chase, W. G. (1974) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421395 · Cited by 2,134
Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems
Larkin, J., McDermott, J. P., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.208.4450.1335 · Cited by 2,112
Expert performance: its structure and acquisition.
Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.8.725 · Cited by 2,072
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Visual Information Processing · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-170150-5.50011-1 · Cited by 1,419
Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1982) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809477.031 · Cited by 1,162
Exploring the "planning fallacy": Why people underestimate their task completion times.
Buehler, R., Griffin, D. W., & Ross, M. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.366 · Cited by 1,105
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003435 · Cited by 4,481
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,583
Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.025 · Cited by 2,349
Carlile, P. R. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0094 · Cited by 3,101
(2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098 · Cited by 2,293
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004 · Cited by 3,476
How we know--and sometimes misjudge--what others know: Imputing one's own knowledge to others.
Nickerson, R. S. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.737 · Cited by 841
Two Approaches to the Study of Experts' Characteristics
Michelene, T. H. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816796.002 · Cited by 763
Dunning, D. A., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.020 · Cited by 689
On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672 · Cited by 840
Into the Black Box: The Knowledge Transformation Cycle
Carlile, P. R., & Rebentisch, E. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.9.1180.16564 · Cited by 573
“But the creation of specialists by definition restricts the accessibility of the knowledge by a novice (Hinds 1999) or a specialist from another area (Dougherty 1992).”
BackgroundIncorporating the Irrelevant: Anchors in Judgments of Belief and Value
Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.008 · Cited by 424
Sloman, S. A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.024 · Cited by 412
HINDS, P. J., Patterson, M., & Pfeffer, J. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1232 · Cited by 379
“In the same study, those with an intermediate level of expertise were more accurate than were experts in their estimation of novices' experience (Hinds, 1999).”
BackgroundSelf-citationCho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Wilson, R. W. (2006) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.891 · Cited by 355
Shepherding the crowd yields better work
Dow, S., Kulkarni, A., Klemmer, S., & Hartmann, B. (2012) · Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work · doi:10.1145/2145204.2145355 · Cited by 334
“However, experts often underestimate the difficulty novices face in solving tasks [13] or use language or concepts that are beyond the grasp of novices [8].”
BackgroundCoordination Neglect: How Lay Theories of Organizing Complicate Coordination in Organizations
Heath, C., & Staudenmayer, N. A. (2000) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(00)22005-4 · Cited by 315
“Because people suffer from the curse of knowledge and have difficulty taking another’s perspective, they also underestimate how easy it would be to communicate their knowledge to the other party (Keysar, 1994; Hinds, 1999).”
BackgroundIntroduction – Heuristics and Biases: Then and Now
Gilovich, T. D., & Griffin, D. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.002 · Cited by 312
Norm Theory: Comparing Reality to Its Alternatives
Kahneman, D. J., & Miller, D. T. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.022 · Cited by 285
Understanding children's and adults' limitations in mental state reasoning
Birch, S., & Bloom, P. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.011 · Cited by 276
“These and similar findings have been given a wealth of other names including ‘creeping determinism’ or ‘hindsight’ bias [16], the ‘knew-it-allalong’ effect [20], ‘the curse of expertise’ [ 21 ], ‘adult egocentrism’ [15,22], ‘reality bias’ [12] and ‘epistemic egocentrism’ [13].”
“I know, you know”: epistemic egocentrism in children and adults
Royzman, E. B., Cassidy, K. W., & Baron, J. (2003) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.38 · Cited by 246
Compatibility Effects in Judgment and Choice
Slovic, P., Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.014 · Cited by 235
Not Quite as Grown-Up as We Like to Think
Diamond, A. D., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01530.x · Cited by 219
“Volume 16—Number 4 295 curse-of-knowledge errors (e.g., Hinds, 1999; Nickerson, 1999); both involve a tendency to attribute what one knows to someone less knowledgeable.”
BackgroundSchwarz, N., & Vaughn, L. A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.007 · Cited by 215
When Predictions Fail: The Dilemma of Unrealistic Optimism
Armor, D. A., & Taylor, S. E. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.021 · Cited by 211
The cognitive challenges of effective teaching
Chew, S. L., & Cerbin, W. J. (2020) · The Journal of Economic Education · doi:10.1080/00220485.2020.1845266 · Cited by 292
Sympathetic Magical Thinking: The Contagion and Similarity “Heuristics”
Rozin, P. N., & Nemeroff, C. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.013 · Cited by 195
The efficacy of prototyping under time constraints
Dow, S. P., Heddleston, K., & Klemmer, S. (2009) · Creativity and Cognition · doi:10.1145/1640233.1640260 · Cited by 175
“organically? The literature on organizational research can help us hypothesize about the interaction between plans and situated prototyping practices [3, 24 , 50, 56].”
BackgroundAn ontology-based approach to knowledge management in design processes
Brandt, S. C., Morbach, J., Miatidis, M., Theißen, M., Jarke, M., & Marquardt, W. (2007) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.04.013 · Cited by 168
Conveying clinical reasoning based on visual observation via eye-movement modelling examples
Jarodzka, H., Balslev, T., Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P. H., & Εika, B. (2012) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9218-5 · Cited by 184
“Experts, however, may not necessarily know what the most important feature for novices is, since experts often have difficulties in correctly assessing the knowledge state of novices (Hinds 1999; Nückles et al. 2006).”
BackgroundLi, W. (2025) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2310354 · Cited by 167
“Conversely, relatively novice designers may be more susceptible to negative information, resulting in stronger perceived anxiety (Hinds, 1999).”
Performance in Planning: Processes, Requirements, and Errors
Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Doorn, J. R. V. (2001) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.3.213 · Cited by 175
Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.026 · Cited by 178
Inside the Planning Fallacy: The Causes and Consequences of Optimistic Time Predictions
Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Ross, M. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.016 · Cited by 169
Financial capability: a behavioural economics perspective
de Meza, D. E., Irlenbusch, B., & Reyniers, D. J. (2008) · Cited by 156
Feldon, D. F. (2009) · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) · doi:10.4324/9780203880869.ch43 · Cited by 153
“This results in signifi cant, though unintended, omissions when experts train novices or try to communicate their expertise to others, which can negatively impact instructional effi ciency and lead to subsequent diffi culties for learners (Chao & Salvendy, 1994; Feldon, 2007; Hinds, 1999).”
BackgroundUnderestimating the Duration of Future Events: Memory Incorrectly Used or Memory Bias?
Roy, M. M., Christenfeld, N. J. S., & McKenzie, C. R. M. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.738 · Cited by 147
“The assumption is that people (a) fail to remember that in the past they have been interrupted by surprises (Byram, 1997; Hinds, 1999), (b) do not remember all the subcomponents of the task when planning (Byram, 1997; Connolly & Dean, 1997), (c) are overly narrow in their focus on the task (Buehler et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGilbert, D. T. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.011 · Cited by 153
Feelings as Information: Moods Influence Judgments and Processing Strategies
Schwarz, N. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.031 · Cited by 149
The calibration of expert judgment: heuristics and biases beyond the laboratory
Koehler, D. J., Brenner, L., & Griffin, D. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.041 · Cited by 146
Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice
Harvey, M., & Luzia, K. (2013) · Cited by 141
Blurring the Boundaries: Cell Phones, Mobility, and the Line between Work and Personal Life
Gant, D. B., & Kiesler, S. B. (2002) · Computer supported cooperative work · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0665-4_9 · Cited by 140
Kollmann, T., Stöckmann, C., & Kensbock, J. M. (2018) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.08.001 · Cited by 137
Counterfactual Thought, Regret, and Superstition: How to Avoid Kicking Yourself
Miller, D. T., & Taylor, B. R. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.023 · Cited by 120
How Good are Fast and Frugal Heuristics?
Gigerenzer, G., Czerlinski, J., & Martignon, L. F. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5089-1_6 · Cited by 125
Understanding Misunderstanding: Social Psychological Perspectives
Pronin, E., Puccio, C., & Ross, L. D. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.038 · Cited by 120
Bromme, R., Rambow, R., & Nückles, M. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.7.4.317 · Cited by 119
Buehler, R., Griffin, D. W., & Peetz, J. (2010) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(10)43001-4 · Cited by 110
Halkjelsvik, T., & Jørgensen, M. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0025996 · Cited by 105
Extensional versus Intuitive Reasoning
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.003 · Cited by 111
Frederick, S. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.032 · Cited by 103
van Nooijen, C. C. A., de Koning, B. B., Bramer, W. M., Isahakyan, A., Asoodar, M., Kok, E. M., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & PAAS, F. G. W. C. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09848-3 · Cited by 174
Planning in organizations: Performance as a multi-level phenomenon
Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Osburn, H. K. (2004) · Research in multi-level issues · doi:10.1016/s1475-9144(02)01026-3 · Cited by 95
Reily, K., Finnerty, P. L., & Terveen, L. (2009) · International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP) · doi:10.1145/1531674.1531692 · Cited by 87
“Hinds identified a “cognitive handicap” that experts have when attempting to identify with the skill set of a novice [19].”
BackgroundHow long will it take? Power biases time predictions
Weick, M., & Guinote, A. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.005 · Cited by 85
Ritchie, K. L., Smith, F. G., Jenkins, R., Bindemann, M., White, D., & Burton, A. M. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.002 · Cited by 64
“Similar effects exist for people skilled in particular cognitive tasks – people with expertise in particular tasks (like operating electronic equipment) tend to assume that others will be able to learn these easily (Hinds, 1999).”
Is There a Doctor in the House? Expert Product Users, Organizational Roles, and Innovation
Katila, R., Thatchenkery, S. M., Christensen, M. Q., & Zenios, S. A. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.1112 · Cited by 83
The Projective Way of Knowing: A Useful Heuristic That Sometimes Misleads
Nickerson, R. S. (2001) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00141 · Cited by 82
Bondt, W. F. M. D., & Thaler, R. H. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.040 · Cited by 82
Fair Work: Crowd Work Minimum Wage with One Line of Code
Whiting, M. E., Hugh, G., & Bernstein, M. S. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing · doi:10.1609/hcomp.v7i1.5283 · Cited by 80
“Some requesters, or task authors, explicitly take advantage of this to underpay workers; others are well intentioned but still accidentally underpay because expertise bias leads us to underestimate how challenging our tasks actually are (Hinds 1999).”
BackgroundNückles, M., Wittwer, J., & Renkl, A. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.11.4.219 · Cited by 80
Scenario evaluation of municipal Web sites: Development and use of an expert-focused evaluation tool
de Jong, M. D. T., & Lentz, L. R. (2005) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.007 · Cited by 77
Barriers and Biases in Computer-Mediated Expert-Layperson-Communication
Bromme, R., Jucks, R., & Runde, A. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-387-24319-4_5 · Cited by 76
Feldon, D. F., Maher, M., Hurst, M. D., & Timmerman, B. E. (2014) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831214549449 · Cited by 75
“Further, laboratory studies consistently find that experts underestimate the necessary time and effort required by novices to complete tasks and overestimate the relevant knowledge that novices possess (Hinds, 1999; Nickerson, 1999).”
BackgroundMental Contamination and the Debiasing Problem
Wilson, T. D., Centerbar, D. B., & Brekke, N. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.012 · Cited by 160
Knowledge Communication Problems between Experts and Decision Makers: an Overview and Classification
Eppler, M. J. (2007) · Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management · Cited by 71
Folk Mereology is Teleological
Rosé, D., & Schaffer, J. (2015) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12123 · Cited by 72
Birch, S., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., Haddock, T., & Ghrear, S. E. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.015 · Cited by 74
How to refer to ‘diabetes’? Language in online health advice
Bromme, R., Jucks, R., & Wagner, T. J. (2005) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1099 · Cited by 67
Underpredicting Learning after Initial Experience with a Product
Billeter, D., Kalra, A., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/655862 · Cited by 70
“For example, Hinds (1999) finds that experts make greater errors than people with intermediate skill levels when predicting novice performance, positing that the error results from the experts’ failure to recall the initial difficult period of mastery.”
BackgroundSelf-Anchoring in Conversation: Why Language Users Do Not Do What They “Should”
Keysar, B., & Barr, D. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.010 · Cited by 67
Durability Bias in Affective Forecasting
Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.018 · Cited by 66
Measuring Crowdsourcing Effort with Error-Time Curves
Cheng, J., Teevan, J. B., & Bernstein, M. S. (2015) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702145 · Cited by 67
“It is difficult for re-questers to accurately estimate task difficulty, as experts cat-egorically underestimate novices’ completion times and dif-ficulty [12, 13].”
BackgroundWhat Can Children Tell Us About Hindsight Bias: A Fundamental Constraint on Perspective–Taking?
Birch, S., & Bernstein, D. M. (2007) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.98 · Cited by 65
“If they fail to fully appreciate their audience’s more naive perspective they will deliver their message at a less than optimal level (e.g., Hinds, 1999).”
BackgroundPeer-based computer-supported knowledge refinement
Cho, K., Chung, T. R., King, W. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1325555.1325571 · Cited by 62
“Hinds (1999) showed that experts overestimated non-”
BackgroundChowdhury, P. D., Haque, C. E., & Driedger, S. M. (2011) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2011.601319 · Cited by 62
Bias in memory predicts bias in estimation of future task duration
Roy, M. M., & Christenfeld, N. J. S. (2007) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03193294 · Cited by 59
Bell, H. H., Andrews, D. H., Wulfeck, W. H., Villachica, S. W., Stone, D. L., Clark, R. E., Yates, K. A., Early, S. D., Moulton, K., Mayer, R. E., et al. (2009) · Cited by 57
Dow, S. P., Kulkarni, A. P., Bunge, B., Nguyen, T., Klemmer, S., & Hartmann, B. (2011) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/1979742.1979826 · Cited by 59
“However, experts often underestimate the difficulty novices face in solving tasks [7] or use language or concepts that are beyond the grasp of novices [6].”
BackgroundOstermann, A., Leuders, T., & Nückles, M. (2017) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-017-9369-z · Cited by 56
Timmerman, B. C., Feldon, D. F., Maher, M., Strickland, D. C., & Gilmore, J. A. (2011) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.590971 · Cited by 56
Limbu, B. H., Jarodzka, H. M., Klemke, R., & Specht, M. M. (2018) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2018.07.001 · Cited by 55
Probability Judgment across Cultures
Yates, J. F., Lee, J., Sieck, W. R., Choi, I., & Price, P. C. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.017 · Cited by 55
Dunning–Kruger effects in face perception
Zhou, X., & Jenkins, R. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104345 · Cited by 54
Pugh, C. M., & Salud, L. H. (2007) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.12.033 · Cited by 52
Jansen, T., & Møller, J. (2021) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103616 · Cited by 80
Heuristics and Biases in Application
Fischhoff, B. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.043 · Cited by 51
Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.042 · Cited by 53
Putting Adjustment Back in the Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. D. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.009 · Cited by 52
The Effects of Politeness-Related Instruction on Medical Tutoring
Bromme, R., Brummernhenrich, B., Becker, B.-M., & Jucks, R. (2012) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.691979 · Cited by 49
Khadivzadeh, T., & Erfanian, F. (2012) · Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0b013e31826064b7 · Cited by 48
Like Goes with Like: The Role of Representativeness in Erroneous and Pseudo-Scientific Beliefs
Gilovich, T. D., & Savitsky, K. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.036 · Cited by 50
Sherman, S. J., Cialdini, R. B., Schwartzman, D. F., & Reynolds, K. D. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.006 · Cited by 46
Gaikwad, S. S., Morina, D., Ginzberg, A., Mullings, C. A., Goyal, S., Gamage, D., Diemert, C., Burton, M., Zhou, S., Whiting, M. E., et al. (2016) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/2984511.2984542 · Cited by 48
“measurable because workers have no incentive to report this number after they complete a task, automatic logs are not accurate [26, 11, 12], and requesters underestimate how long a task will take [20].”
BackgroundThe effect of construal level on predictions of task duration
Kanten, A. B. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.04.005 · Cited by 43
Correcting memory improves accuracy of predicted task duration.
Roy, M. M., Mitten, S. T., & Christenfeld, N. J. S. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.14.3.266 · Cited by 43
Communicative Visualizations as a Learning Problem
Adar, E., & Lee-Robbins, E. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2020.3030375 · Cited by 43
“Because the experience of the student may be far removed from what the teacher intended [47,64], assessment helps close the loop [73].”
BackgroundRemarks on Support Theory: Recent Advances and Future Directions
Brenner, L. A., Koehler, D. J., & Rottenstreich, Y. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.029 · Cited by 45
Nückles, M., Winter, A., Wittwer, J., Herbert, M., & Hübner, S. (2006) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-006-9000-y · Cited by 43
“This phenomenon has tellingly been coined as an " expert blind spot " (Nathan and Koedinger, 2000) or the " curse of expertise " (Hinds, 1999).”
BackgroundInfluentialKang, H., & Kim, J. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12115614 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Hinds, P. J.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hinds, Pamela J.
- ORCID
- Hinds, Pamela J.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 205-221
- ISSN
- 1076-898X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2192
- OpenAlex
- W2011381597
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 10.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- expertise, cognitive heuristics, bias mitigation, underestimation bias, expert opinion, task performance prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
