Cited by 121Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Eye movements and behavioral responses to threatening and nonthreatening stimuli during visual search in phobic and nonphobic subjects

Miltner, Wolfgang H. R., Krieschel, Silke, Hecht, Holger, Trippe, Ralf, Weiss, Thomas·2004·Emotion

Abstract

Spider-phobic and nonphobic subjects searched for a feared/fear-relevant (spider) or neutral target (mushroom) presented in visual matrices of neutral objects (flowers). In half of the displays, the mushroom target was paired with a spider distractor, or a spider target was paired with a mushroom distractor. Although all subjects responded faster to the neutral target than to the feared/fear-relevant target, phobics were slower to respond than nonphobics when a mushroom target was presented with a spider distractor. Their eyes appeared to be drawn to the feared distractor before fixating neutral targets. A further experiment indicated no group differences when subjects merely judged the homogeneity of matrices. Thus, threat seems to capture the attention of phobics only when it is part of a background that subjects are explicitly instructed to ignore.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1528-3542.4.4.323

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The within-groups effects alone were not interpretable, as the search conditions without threatening stimuli were not always matched for difficulty with the conditions containing distractors.

    “The within-groups effects alone were not interpretable, as the search conditions without threatening stimuli were not always matched for difficulty with the conditions containing distractors (e.g., Miltner et al., 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miltner, W. H. R., Krieschel, S., Hecht, H., Trippe, R., & Weiss, T.
Affiliations
Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2004
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
323-339
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2082512639
Cited by
121
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
spider phobia, visual search, eye movements, threat detection, attentional capture, distractor processing, fear-relevant stimuli
MeSH terms
Adult, Eye Movements, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Phobic Disorders, Visual Perception, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review