Cited by 662Psychometric Methodologies and TestingStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceMental Health Research Topics

Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models

Coffman, Donna L., MacCallum, Robert C.·2005·Multivariate Behavioral Research

Abstract

The biasing effects of measurement error in path analysis models can be overcome by the use of latent variable models. In cases where path analysis is used in practice, it is often possible to use parcels as indicators of a latent variable. The purpose of the current study was to compare latent variable models in which parcels were used as indicators of the latent variables, path analysis models of the aggregated variables, and models in which reliability estimates were used to correct for measurement error in path analysis models. Results showed that point estimates of path coefficients were smallest for the path analysis models and largest for the latent variable models. It is concluded that, whenever possible, it is better to use a latent variable model in which parcels are used as indicators than a path analysis model using total scale scores.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327906mbr4002_4

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coffman, D. L., & MacCallum, R. C.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Multivariate Behavioral Research
Published
2005-04
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
235-259
ISSN
  • 0027-3171 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7906
OpenAlex
W2065353896
Cited by
662
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 38
FWCI
12.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Multivariate Behavioral Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
path analysis, latent variable models, measurement error, measurement bias, scale scores, structural equation modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review