Cited by 220Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Self‐affirmation and mortality salience: Affirming values reduces worldview defense and death‐thought accessibility

Schmeichel, Brandon J., Martens, Andy·2005·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

To the extent that cultural worldviews provide meaning in the face of existential concerns, specifically the inevitability of death, affirming a valued aspect of one’s worldview should render reminders of death less threatening. The authors report two studies in support of this view. In Study 1, mortality salience led to derogation of a worldview violator unless participants had first affirmed an important value. In Study 2, self-affirmation before a reminder of death was associated with reduced accessibility of death-related thoughts a short while thereafter. The authors propose that actively affirming one’s worldview alters reactions to reminders of mortality by reducing the accessibility of death-related thoughts, not by boosting self-esteem. These studies attest to the flexible nature of psychological self-defense and to the central role of cultural worldviews in managing death-related concerns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167204271567

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-affirmation studies generally find that affirmation of important values has no effect on self-reported mood.

    “self-aYrmation studies generally find that aYrmation of important values has no eVect on self-reported mood (Fein & Spencer, 1997;Schmeichel & Martens, 2005;Sherman et al., 2000;Spencer et al., 2001)”

    From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Schmeichel & Martens, 2005

  • Schmeichel and Martens (2005) found no effects of affirmation on self-esteem, while finding effects on worldview defense and death-thought accessibility.

    “While they did find eVects on the primary outcomes featured in that study (worldview defense and death-thought accessibility), they found no eVects on self-esteem.”

    From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Schmeichel and Martens (2005)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmeichel, B. J., & Martens, A.
Affiliations
  • Florida State University (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Martens, Andy
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2005-05
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
658-667
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2066876973
Cited by
220
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
self-affirmation, mortality salience, fear of death, worldview defense, values affirmation, self-defense, cultural worldview, existential concerns, self-esteem
MeSH terms
Attitude to Death, Female, Humans, Male, Self Concept, Social Values, Thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review