Cited by 197Face Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The impact of facial emotional expressions on behavioral tendencies in women and men

Open access
Seidel, Eva-Maria, Habel, Ute, Kirschner, Michaela, Gur, Ruben C., Derntl, Birgit·2010·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Abstract

Emotional faces communicate both the emotional state and behavioral intentions of an individual. They also activate behavioral tendencies in the perceiver, namely approach or avoidance. Here, we compared more automatic motor to more conscious rating responses to happy, sad, angry, and disgusted faces in a healthy student sample. Happiness was associated with approach and anger with avoidance. However, behavioral tendencies in response to sadness and disgust were more complex. Sadness produced automatic approach but conscious withdrawal, probably influenced by interpersonal relations or personality. Disgust elicited withdrawal in the rating task, whereas no significant tendency emerged in the joystick task, probably driven by expression style. Based on our results, it is highly relevant to further explore actual reactions to emotional expressions and to differentiate between automatic and controlled processes because emotional faces are used in various kinds of studies. Moreover, our results highlight the importance of gender of poser effects when applying emotional expressions as stimuli.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0018169

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seidel, E.-M., Habel, U., Kirschner, M., Gur, R. C., & Derntl, B.
Affiliations
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
  • Jülich Aachen Research Alliance (DE)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Published
2010
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
500-507
ISSN
  • 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1277
OpenAlex
W1991142926
Cited by
197
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • RWTH Aachen University (690811)
  • German Research Foundation (DFG) (KFO 112)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 60722)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
emotional facial expressions, approach-avoidance tendencies, gender differences, happiness, sadness, anger, disgust, emotion ratings, expression style
MeSH terms
Adult, Anger, Avoidance Learning, Emotions, Escape Reaction, Facial Expression, Female, Happiness, Humans, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Sex Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review