Cited by 79Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMind wandering and attentionPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Facilitating a benign attentional bias reduces negative thought intrusions.

Hayes, Sarra, Hirsch, Colette R., Mathews, Andrew·2010·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

The causal role of biased attention in worry was investigated in an experiment in which high worriers were assigned either to a condition requiring attention to nonthreatening words and text while ignoring worry-related material or to a mixed-attention control condition. The former procedure led to fewer negative thought intrusions in a worry test (as rated by both participants and an assessor) than did the control condition. These findings suggest that attentional bias plays a causal role in worry and that its modification can reduce excessive worry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0018264

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayes, S., Hirsch, C. R., & Mathews, A.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2010-02
Volume
119
Issue
1
Pages
235-240
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2006702076
Cited by
79
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
attentional bias, worry, excessive worry, anxiety, cognitive bias modification
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Anxiety Disorders, Attention, Cognition, Dichotic Listening Tests, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Teaching, Thinking, Vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review