Cited by 43Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Approaching cognitive behavior therapy for generalized anxiety disorder from a cognitive process perspective

Open access
Hirsch, Colette R., Beale, Sarah, Grey, Nick, Liness, Sheena·2019·Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract

Generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), with uncontrollable worry at its core, is a common psychological disorder with considerable individual and societal costs. Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is recommended as the first-line treatment for GAD; however, further investigation into its effectiveness in routine clinical care is indicated and improvement is required in treatment outcomes for worry. Improvements to CBT need to be guided by experimental research that identifies key mechanisms maintaining core aspects of the disorder. This paper summarises how theory-driven experimental research guided selection and refinements of CBT techniques originally developed by Borkovec and Costello (1993), to target key cognitive processes that maintain worry in GAD. Hirsch and Mathews’ (2012) model specifies three key research-supported processes that maintain uncontrollable worry in GAD: implicit cognitive biases such as negative interpretation bias and attention bias, generalised verbal thinking style, and impaired ability to re-direct attentional control away from worry. Specific CBT techniques outlined in this paper aim to target these key processes. Clinical data from clients treated using our refined CBT protocol for GAD in a routine clinical care service with a special interest in anxiety disorders were collected as part of service procedures. Large pre-to-posttreatment effect sizes were obtained for anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-9), and worry (PSWQ) (d=.90-2.54), and a moderate effect size was obtained for quality of life (WASA; d=.74). Recovery was indicated for 74% of cases for anxiety, 78% for depression, and 53% for worry. These findings exceeded most previous effectiveness studies in routine care and were in-line with GAD efficacy trials. This paper also outlines the application of specific clinical techniques selected, adapted or developed to target key cognitive mechanisms which maintain worry in GAD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00796

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is not clear which CBT protocol is most effective and most suitable in primary care settings.

    “It is not clear which CBT protocol is most effective and most suitable in primary care settings. There are several systematic reviews of the different protocols [19, 23–26], but there are few studies per protocol, and many studies have small sample sizes and/or used waitlist controls.”

    From Intolerance-of-uncertainty therapy versus metacognitive therapy for generalized anxiety disorder in primary health care: A randomized controlled pilot trial (2023) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Introduction (Psychological Therapies for GAD; page unavailable) says that several CBT protocols are recommended, and the Discussion (page unavailable) says this audit cannot isolate the effect of its protocol refinements. These passages are consistent with uncertainty about which protocol is most effective, but the paper does not assess which is most suitable for primary care settings. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Individual CBT leads to moderate to large improvements in chronic worry severity, GAD symptom severity, and depression symptom severity in frontline settings.

    “there is promising support that individual CBT leads to moderate to large improvements in chronic worry severity, GAD symptom severity, and depression symptom severity (e.g. Hirsch et al ., 2019; Kehle, 2008)”
  • Previous evidence underlined the effectiveness of cognitive interventions focused both on symptoms and cognitive dysfunctional processes present in GAD, like worries.

    “Previous evidence underlined the effectiveness of cognitive interventions focused both on symptoms and cognitive dysfunctional processes present in GAD, like worries (Covin et al., 2008; Hirsch et al., 2019; Miller et al., 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [23]Borkovec TD Ruscio AM A new theory of experiential avoidance in generalized anxiety disorder: a review and synthesis of research supporting an avoidance of a negative emotional contrast. J Clin Psychiatry (2001) 62(May): 37– 42. 11414549
  2. [25]Dugas MJ Generalized anxiety disorder. In: Hersen M, editor. Clinical behaviour therapy: Adults and children. New York, N. Y.: Wiley (2002). p. 125–43.
  3. [88]Gilbert P ed. Compassion: Conceptualisations, research, and use in psychotherapy. Hove, East Sussex: Routledge (2005).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hirsch, C. R., Beale, S., Grey, N., & Liness, S.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Hirsch, Colette R.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2019-11-04
Volume
10
Pages
796-796
ISSN
1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981972182
Cited by
43
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • King's College London
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, worry, cognitive processes, negative interpretation bias, attentional bias, attentional control, treatment effectiveness, routine clinical practice, depression, quality of life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review