Cited by 278Regulation of Appetite and ObesityNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorEating Disorders and Behaviors

Mind over milkshakes: Mindsets, not just nutrients, determine ghrelin response.

Crum, Alia J., Corbin, William R., Brownell, Kelly D., Salovey, Peter·2011·Health Psychology

Abstract

Objective To test whether physiological satiation as measured by the gut peptide ghrelin may vary depending on the mindset in which one approaches consumption of food. Methods On 2 separate occasions, participants (n = 46) consumed a 380-calorie milkshake under the pretense that it was either a 620-calorie "indulgent" shake or a 140-calorie "sensible" shake. Ghrelin was measured via intravenous blood samples at 3 time points: baseline (20 min), anticipatory (60 min), and postconsumption (90 min). During the first interval (between 20 and 60 min) participants were asked to view and rate the (misleading) label of the shake. During the second interval (between 60 and 90 min) participants were asked to drink and rate the milkshake. Results The mindset of indulgence produced a dramatically steeper decline in ghrelin after consuming the shake, whereas the mindset of sensibility produced a relatively flat ghrelin response. Participants' satiety was consistent with what they believed they were consuming rather than the actual nutritional value of what they consumed. Conclusions The effect of food consumption on ghrelin may be psychologically mediated, and mindset meaningfully affects physiological responses to food.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0023467

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Labeling unhealthy or ambiguously healthy foods as healthy, as opposed to unhealthy, tasty, or neutral, has negative impacts on taste, satiety, and preference.

    “Early work in this area demonstrated negative impacts on taste, satiety, and preference when unhealthy or ambiguously healthy foods (e.g., crackers, cookies) were labeled as healthy as opposed to unhealthy, tasty, or neutral (Crum et al., 2011; Finkelstein & Fishbach, 2010; Lähteenmäki et al., 2010; Raghunathan et al., 2006; Suher et al., 2016; Wansink & Chandon, 2006; Wardle & Huon, 2000).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crum, A. J., Corbin, W. R., Brownell, K. D., & Salovey, P.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2011
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
424-429
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2092456099
Cited by
278
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Rudd Foundation
  • Yale Center for Clinical Investigation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
ghrelin, mindset, food labeling, satiety, milkshakes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Eating, Humans, Satiation, Ghrelin, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review