Cited by 324Physical Activity and HealthTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Exercise and depression: A review of reviews

Daley, Amanda·2008·Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

Abstract

There has been considerable research interest in the effects of exercise upon depression outcomes. Recently, health agencies in the United Kingdom (UK) and beyond have made several guidance statements on this issue. Therefore, this review seeks to provide a synthesis of evidence regarding the effectiveness of exercise in the management of depression (including postnatal depression) in adults. Studies were identified by searching PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) and PsychINFO using relevant search terms. The article describes how meta-analyses from peer reviewed journals have reported exercise as treatment for depression is more effective than no treatment, as effective as traditional interventions in some instances, possibly a promising approach to postnatal depression and has equivalent adherence rates to medication. However, reviews have also raised concerns about the methodological quality of trials, possible overestimation of treatment effects and lack of data regarding long term benefits. Based on the available evidence it is concluded that while awaiting further high quality trial evidence it would seem appropriate for exercise to be recommended in combination with other treatments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10880-008-9105-z

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous systematic reviews on the effects of physical activity interventions on psychosocial outcomes mainly focus on internalizing problems or cognition in adult populations.

    “Anextensive amount of systematic reviews on the effects of physical activity interventions on psychosocial outcomes are available, but these mainly focus on internalizing problems or cognition in adult populations”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daley, A.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Daley, Amanda
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
Published
2008-04-15
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
140-147
ISSN
  • 1068-9583 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3572
OpenAlex
W2081174811
Cited by
324
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 28
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
physical activity, depression, postpartum depression, exercise therapy, treatment effectiveness, medication adherence, methodological quality of trials, overestimation of treatment effects, long-term benefits, combination therapy
MeSH terms
Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Depression, Postpartum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review