Cited by 94Social and Intergroup PsychologyEmotions and Moral BehaviorTeam Dynamics and Performance

Looking down: The influence of contempt and compassion on emergent leadership categorizations.

Melwani, Shimul, Mueller, Jennifer S., Overbeck, Jennifer R.·2012·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

By integrating the literatures on implicit leadership and the social functions of discrete emotions, we develop and test a theoretical model of emotion expression and leadership categorizations. Specifically, we examine the influence of 2 socio-comparative emotions-compassion and contempt-on assessments of leadership made both in 1st impression contexts and over time. To demonstrate both internal and external validity, Studies 1a and 1b provide laboratory and field evidence to show that expressing the discrete emotions of contempt and compassion positively relates to perceptions that an individual is a leader. Study 2 tests the mechanism explaining these associations. Specifically, we show that in a leadership emergence context, contempt and compassion both positively relate to perceptions that the expresser is a leader because each provides cues matching the implicit theory that leaders have higher intelligence. Our findings add to a growing body of literature focused on identifying the processes through which leaders emerge in groups, showing that emotions are an important input to this process. We discuss the implications of our findings and how they might guide future research efforts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0030074

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Expressions of contempt and compassion were associated with leadership perceptions because these emotions matched the observers' implicit beliefs about leaders.

    “Furthermore, expressions of contempt and compassion were associated with leadership perceptions because these emotions matched the observers’ implicit beliefs about leaders (Melwani et al. 2012).”

    From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Melwani et al. 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 118 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Melwani, S., Mueller, J. S., & Overbeck, J. R.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2012-11
Volume
97
Issue
6
Pages
1171-1185
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W2334303100
Cited by
94
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
12.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
contempt, compassion, leadership emergence, emotional expression, implicit leadership theory, first impressions, social functions of emotion, discrete emotions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Emotions, Empathy, Female, Group Processes, Humans, Judgment, Leadership, Male, Models, Psychological, Social Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review