Cited by 46Action Observation and SynchronizationFace Recognition and PerceptionTactile and Sensory Interactions

I feel your fear: shared touch between faces facilitates recognition of fearful facial expressions

Open access
Maister, Lara, Tsiakkas, Eleni, Tsakiris, Manos·2013·Emotion

Abstract

Embodied simulation accounts of emotion recognition claim that we vicariously activate somatosensory representations to simulate, and eventually understand, how others feel. Interestingly, mirror-touch synesthetes, who experience touch when observing others being touched, show both enhanced somatosensory simulation and superior recognition of emotional facial expressions. We employed synchronous visuotactile stimulation to experimentally induce a similar experience of "mirror touch" in nonsynesthetic participants. Seeing someone else's face being touched at the same time as one's own face results in the "enfacement illusion," which has been previously shown to blur self-other boundaries. We demonstrate that the enfacement illusion also facilitates emotion recognition, and, importantly, this facilitatory effect is specific to fearful facial expressions. Shared synchronous multisensory experiences may experimentally facilitate somatosensory simulation mechanisms involved in the recognition of fearful emotional expressions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0030884

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maister, L., Tsiakkas, E., & Tsakiris, M.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2013-02
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
7-13
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2060726415
Cited by
46
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4
FWCI
10.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • European Platform for Life Sciences, Mind Sciences and Humanities
  • Economic and Social Research Council (RES-061-25-0233)
  • European Research Council (ERC-2010-StG-262853)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
enfacement illusion, emotion recognition, embodied simulation, self-other boundary, multisensory integration
MeSH terms
Adult, Face, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Humans, Illusions, Neuropsychological Tests, Social Perception, Visual Perception, Recognition, Psychology, Touch Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review