Cited by 35Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSport Psychology and Performance

Mindful acceptance dampens neuroaffective reactions to external and rewarding performance feedback

Teper, Rimma, Inzlicht, Michael·2014·Emotion

Abstract

Previous research on mindfulness has suggested that individuals high in trait mindfulness show heightened sensitivity to visceral and internally generated stimuli. However, when mindful individuals are exposed to external stimuli-such as pictures or faces-their emotional responses are typically attenuated. In the current study, we tested how trait mindfulness relates to reactivity in response to a different type of external stimulus, namely, performance feedback. Using electroencephalography, we recorded participants' neuroaffective reactions to rewarding, aversive, and neutral feedback, as indexed by the feedback-related negativity (FRN). The FRN is a brain response that peaks approximately 250 ms after feedback presentation, and it is thought to differentiate feedback indicating favorable versus unfavorable outcomes. Our findings suggest trait mindfulness predicts less differentiation of rewarding from neutral feedback, but does not predict brain differentiation of aversive from neutral feedback. This was the case particularly for individuals who scored highly on the "acceptance" facet of mindfulness, a facet that assesses the nonjudgmental acceptance of thoughts and emotions. We discuss the implications of these findings for current theory on mindfulness and emotion regulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0034296

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-reported trait mindfulness has been shown to affect responses to emotional stimuli other than pictures, including social evaluative stress, CO2 inhalation, rewarding stimuli, and conflict discussion.

    “For example, self-reported trait mindfulness has been shown to reduce cortisol and negative affect to social evaluative stress [55], to reduce heart rate and subjective distress to CO2 inhalation while engaging in suppression [56], to dampen neuroaffective reactions (i.e., the feedback-related negativity) to rewarding stimuli during a time-estimation task [57], and to decrease cortisol and neg”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teper, R., & Inzlicht, M.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2014-02
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
105-114
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2151628276
Cited by
35
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (410-2011-1301)
  • Canada Foundation for Innovation
  • Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
trait mindfulness, mindful acceptance, performance feedback, feedback-related negativity, reward processing, emotion regulation, external stimuli
MeSH terms
Brain, Electroencephalography, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Reward, Feedback, Psychological, Young Adult, Mindfulness, Interoception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review