Cited by 151Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorWorkplace Violence and BullyingEthics in Business and Education

Cleansing my abuse: A reparative response model of perpetrating abusive supervisor behavior

Open access
Liao, Zhenyu, Yam, Kai Chi, Johnson, Russell E., Liu, Wu, Song, Zhaoli·2018·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

Research on abusive supervision has predominantly focused on the consequences for victims while overlooking how leaders respond to their own abusive behavior. Drawing from the literature on moral cleansing, we posit that supervisors who engage in abusive behavior may paradoxically engage in more constructive leadership behaviors subsequently as a result of feeling guilty and perceiving loss of moral credits. Results from two experience sampling studies show that, within leaders on a daily basis, perpetrating abusive supervisor behavior led to an increase in experienced guilt and perceived loss of moral credits, which in turn motivated leaders to engage in more constructive person-oriented (consideration) and task-oriented (initiating structure) leadership behaviors. In addition, leader moral attentiveness and moral courage strengthen these indirect effects by amplifying leaders' awareness of their immoral behavior and their willingness and determination to make reparations for such behavior. Our research contributes to the theoretical understanding of leaders' responses toward their own abusive supervisor behavior and provides insights into how and when destructive leadership behaviors may, paradoxically, trigger more constructive behaviors. (PsycINFO Database Record

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/apl0000319

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [16]16. Fleishman, E. A. (1995). Consideration and structure: Another look at their role in leadership research. In F. Dansereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Leadership: The multiple-level approaches (pp. 51-60). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
  2. [20]20. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  3. [67]67. Zhong, C. B., Liljenquist, K., & Cain, D. M. (2009). Moral self-regulation: Licensing & compensation. In D. De Cremer (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making (pp. 75-89). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liao, Z., Yam, K. C., Johnson, R. E., Liu, W., & Song, Z.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2018-09
Volume
103
Issue
9
Pages
1039-1056
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W2801233693
Cited by
151
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2
FWCI
18.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Singapore Ministry of Education (R-317-000-110-112; R-317-000-132-115)
  • Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (RGCPolyU155006/15B)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
Keywords
abusive supervision, moral cleansing, moral credit, constructive leadership, consideration, initiating structure, moral courage, moral attentiveness, destructive leadership
MeSH terms
Adult, Aggression, China, Conscience, Emotions, Employment, Female, Humans, Leadership, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Models, Psychological, Morals, Motivation, Power, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review