Cited by 351COVID-19 and Mental HealthStudent Stress and CopingEducation during COVID-19 pandemic

When social isolation is nothing new: A longitudinal study on psychological distress during COVID-19 among university students with and without preexisting mental health concerns.

Open access
Hamza, Chloe A., Ewing, Lexi, Heath, Nancy L., Goldstein, Abby L.·2021·Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne

Abstract

Health ConcernsThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic has had an unprecedented impact on college and university campuses internationally (e.g., widespread campus closures, transitions to online learning).Postsecondary students, who were already a developmentally vulnerable population, are now facing additional new challenges, which could lead to increased mental health concerns.However, there is a paucity of research on the psychological impacts of COVID-19, or who may be most at risk, among postsecondary students.To address these gaps in the literature, we recontacted a sample of 773 postsecondary students (74% female, Mage =18.52) who previously completed a survey on student mental health in May 2019, again in May 2020.Students filled out an online survey at both time points, reporting on their recent stressful experiences and mental health.Although we expected that students with preexisting mental health concerns would show increased psychological distress during the pandemic, this hypothesis was not supported.Instead, repeated-measures analyses demonstrated that students with preexisting mental health concerns showed improving or similar mental health during the pandemic (compared with one year prior).In contrast, students without preexisting mental health concerns were more likely to show declining mental health, which coincided with increased social isolation among these students.Our findings underscore that colleges and universities will not only need to continue to support students with preexisting mental health needs but also prioritize early prevention and intervention programming to mitigate the impacts of COVID-19 on students with increasing psychological distress, potentially stemming from increasing social isolation in response to the pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cap0000255

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During COVID-19, students with pre-existing mental health concerns tended to remain stagnant or slightly improve, while those without pre-existing conditions were more likely to report new concerns, increasing the overall number requiring mental health services.

    “Students who had pre-existing mental health concerns prior to the COVID-19 pandemic tended to remain stagnant or slightly improve in terms of their mental health while those who had no pre-existing conditions were more likely to report new concerns, leading to an overall increase in the number of students requiring mental health services”

    From A Scoping Review of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Higher Education (2024) · cites this paper as Hamza et al., 2021

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Neither Hamm et al. (2020) nor Hamza et al. (2021) found clear evidence of increased risk of suicidal ideation (older adults) or NSSI (students) during the pandemic.

    “Neither Hamm et al., 2020 (trial participants with depression aged >60years) nor Hamza et al., 2021 (students) found clear evidence of increased risk of suicidal ideation (older adults) or NSSI (students) during the pandemic.”
  • Six studies present repeat survey data, with measures recorded during, as well as before, the pandemic.

    “Six studies present repeat survey data, with measures recorded during, as well as before, the pandemic ( Hamm et al., 2020; Hamza et al., 2021; Raifman et al., 2020; Winkler et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020b; Zhang et al., 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamza, C. A., Ewing, L., Heath, N. L., & Goldstein, A. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
Venue
Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne
Published
2021-02
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
20-30
ISSN
  • 0708-5591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-7304
OpenAlex
W3084292719
Cited by
351
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 3
FWCI
26.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship@McGill (McGill) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, university students, student mental health, psychological distress, social isolation, stressful experiences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review