Cited by 28Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Modeling the suicidal behavior cycle: understanding repeated suicide attempts among individuals with borderline personality disorder and a history of attempting suicide

Open access
Kuehn, Kevin S., King, Kevin M., Linehan, Marsha M., Harned, Melanie S.·2020·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Suicide remains a leading cause of death in the United States, and recent reports have suggested the suicide rate is increasing. One of the most robust predictors of future suicidal behavior is a history of attempting suicide. Despite this, little is known about the factors that reduce the likelihood of reattempting suicide. This study compares theoretically derived suicide risk indicators to determine which factors are most predictive of future suicide attempts. METHOD: = 97, mean age = 30.3 years, 100% female, 71% White) met criteria for borderline personality disorder and had repeated and recent self-injurious behavior. Assessments occurred at 4-month intervals throughout 1 year of treatment and 1 year of follow-up. Time-lagged generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) were used to evaluate relationship satisfaction, emotion dysregulation, and coping styles as predictors of suicide attempts. RESULTS: Both univariate and multivariate models suggested that higher between-person variance in problem-focused coping and lack of access to emotion regulation strategies were weakly associated with additional suicide attempts over the 2-year study. Within-person variance in the time-lagged predictors was not associated with subsequent suicide attempts. CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals with a recent suicide attempt, problem-focused coping and specific deficits in emotion regulation may differentiate those likely to reattempt from those who stop suicidal behavior during and after psychotherapy. These results suggest that treatments for recent suicide attempters should target increasing problem-focused coping and decreasing maladaptive emotion regulation skills. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ccp0000496

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A second factor that potentially determines whether people enter the transition phase or leave the transition phase unscathed is the (cognitive) availability of (professional/private) supporters, reasons to live and skills in dealing with emotional turmoil.

    “A second factor that potentially determines whether people enter the transition phase or leave the transition phase unscathed is the (cognitive) availability of (professional/private) supporters, reasons to live and skills in dealing with emotional turmoil (62).”

    From Ambivalence model of suicidality [ABS-model]: an orientation model for the treatment of suicidal individuals (2024) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Results and Discussion report that access to emotion-regulation strategies and problem-focused coping were associated with subsequent suicide attempts among patients with borderline personality disorder. They do not address reasons to live or a distinct transition phase. The Results also found no significant association between relationship satisfaction and subsequent attempts; that measure is not the same as the availability of supporters. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a longitudinal study of adults with a recent suicide attempt who received DBT treatment, participants with higher problem-focused coping and poorer access to emotion regulation strategies were more likely to reattempt suicide over the course of 2 years.

    “In a longitudinal study of adults with a recent suicide attempt who received DBT treatment, participants with higher problem-focused coping and poorer access to emotion regulation strategies were more likely to reattempt suicide over the course of 2 years (Kuehn, King, Linehan, & Harned, 2020).”

    From Efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescent self-harm and suicidal ideation: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as Kuehn, King, Linehan, & Harned, 2020

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Preliminary research provides tentative support for mechanisms of change in DBT-A.

    “Preliminary research provides tentative support for these mechanisms of change.”

    From Efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescent self-harm and suicidal ideation: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as Kuehn, King, Linehan, & Harned, 2020

    The Discussion reports a weak association between access to emotion-regulation strategies and subsequent suicide attempts, offering limited support for one proposed DBT mechanism. But the Method describes an adult BPD sample receiving DBT, not DBT-A, and the Discussion says no within-person changes predicted subsequent attempts. The findings therefore do not establish mechanisms of change in DBT-A. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gratz KL, & Roemer L (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41– 54.
  2. Verbeke G (1997). Linear mixed models for longitudinal data In Linear mixed models in practice (pp. 63– 153). Springer.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuehn, K. S., King, K. M., Linehan, M. M., & Harned, M. S.
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2020-06
Volume
88
Issue
6
Pages
570-581
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W3010885614
Cited by
28
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ResearchWorks at the University of Washington (University of Washington) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01MH034486, F31MH117827-01A1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
repeated suicide attempts, borderline personality disorder, suicide risk factors, problem-focused coping, emotional dysregulation, relationship satisfaction, self-harm, suicide attempters
MeSH terms
Dialectical Behavior Therapy, Emotional Regulation, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Suicide, Attempted, Self-Injurious Behavior, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review