Cited by 138Digital Mental Health InterventionsMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCOVID-19 and Mental Health

A mindfulness-based mobile health (mHealth) intervention among psychologically distressed university students in quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic: A randomized controlled trial.

Open access
Sun, Shufang, Lin, Danhua, Goldberg, Simon, Shen, Zijiao, Chen, Pujing, Qiao, Shan, Brewer, Judson, Loucks, Eric +1 more·2022·Journal of Counseling Psychology

Abstract

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of a mindfulness-based mobile health (mHealth) intervention, tailored to the pandemic context, among young adult students (N = 114) with elevated anxiety and/or depressive symptoms during quarantine in China, compared to a time- and attention-matched social support-based mHealth control. At baseline, postintervention (1 month), and 2-month follow-up, participants completed self-reports of primary outcomes (anxiety and depression), secondary outcomes (mindfulness and social support), and emotional suppression as a culturally relevant mechanism of change. Feasibility and acceptability were also evaluated. Using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, linear mixed effects models showed that compared to social support mHealth, mindfulness mHealth had a superior effect on anxiety (p = .024, between-group d = 0.72). Both conditions improved on depression (baseline-to-FU ds > 1.10, between-group difference not significant, d = 0.36 favoring mindfulness). There was an interaction of Emotional suppression reduction × Condition in the improvement of anxiety and depression. Further, mindfulness mHealth was demonstrated to be more feasible and acceptable in program engagement, evaluation, skills improvement, and perceived benefit. Retention was high in both conditions (>80%). The difference in self-reported adverse effect was nonsignificant (3.9% in mindfulness and 8.7% in social support). Results of this pilot trial suggest that both mindfulness and social support, delivered via mHealth, show promise in reducing distress among young adults in quarantine, with mindfulness being particularly effective in addressing anxiety. Successful implementation and dissemination of this mHealth intervention approach have the potential for addressing the psychological consequences of the pandemic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cou0000568

Cites

65 of 67 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With the challenges that COVID-19 poses to the mental and sexual health of sexual minority young adults, creating a confidential, safe, and supportive online space that fosters development of coping skills such as mindfulness could be an effective and accessible approach to reach and engage vulnerable sexual minority men and enhance population health.

    “With the challenges that COVID-19 poses to the mental and sexual health of sexual minority young adults (e.g., increased isolation, lack of access to community support), creating a confidential, safe, and supportive online space that fosters development of coping skills such as mindfulness could be an effective and accessible approach to reach and engage vulnerable sexual minority men and enhance”

    From Mindfulness for Reducing Minority Stress and Promoting Health Among Sexual Minority Men: Uncovering Intervention Principles and Techniques (2022) · cites this paper as Sun et al., 2022

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The 4-week MBSR with MBCT RCT (N=144) by Sun et al found reductions in anxiety but not depression in the intervention arm relative to the control arms.

    “the 4-week MBSR with mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) RCT (N=144) by Sun et al [66] found reductions in anxiety but not depression in the intervention arm relative to the control arms.”

    From Psychological Interventions and Those With Elements of Positive Psychology for Child and Youth Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Literature Review, Lessons Learned, and Areas for Future Knowledge Dissemination (2024) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Method (Procedure) describes a four-week mHealth intervention adapted from MBSR and MBCT, not an MBSR-and-MBCT course. The Method (Analytic Plan) reports 114 randomized participants, not 144. The Results (Primary Mental Health Outcomes) support greater anxiety improvement than in the social-support control, but no significant between-group difference in depression; depression improved in both groups. (LLM, conf=0.93)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Only one of the studies, the study by Sun et al, evaluated knowledge in relation to self-care, regulating emotions, the mind and body, and coping with stress.

    “Only one of the studies, the study by Sun et al [66], evaluated knowledge in relation to self-care, regulating emotions, the mind and body, and coping with stress.”

    From Psychological Interventions and Those With Elements of Positive Psychology for Child and Youth Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Literature Review, Lessons Learned, and Areas for Future Knowledge Dissemination (2024) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Method > Measures section says the study assessed participants’ perceived improvement in coping, emotion regulation, and self-care skills. The Method > Procedure section describes teaching about the mind and body, but the paper does not say it evaluated knowledge in those areas; teaching content and perceived skills are not a knowledge assessment. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Only one study, the study by Sun et al, reported that participants had learned how to practice mindfulness, including self-regulation of the mind and body.

    “Only one study, the study by Sun et al [66], reported that participants had learned how to practice mindfulness, including self-regulation of the mind and body”

    From Psychological Interventions and Those With Elements of Positive Psychology for Child and Youth Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Literature Review, Lessons Learned, and Areas for Future Knowledge Dissemination (2024) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Method > Procedure describes teaching mindfulness practices focused on bodily sensations, mental states, thoughts, and emotions. Results > Evaluation of Feasibility and Acceptability reports greater participant-rated skills improvement in the mindfulness group, and one participant said they learned to regulate their emotions better. It does not report participants specifically saying they learned self-regulation of both mind and body; the claim is more specific than the reported feedback. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The study by Sun et al found that knowledge of self-care behaviors, emotional regulation, and stress coping improved after the intervention.

    “The study by Sun et al [66] found that knowledge of self-care behaviors, emotional regulation, and stress coping improved after the intervention.”

    From Psychological Interventions and Those With Elements of Positive Psychology for Child and Youth Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Literature Review, Lessons Learned, and Areas for Future Knowledge Dissemination (2024) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Results (Evaluation of Feasibility and Acceptability; page unavailable) report greater self-rated skills improvement in the mindfulness group. The Method (Procedure; page unavailable) says the program taught self-care and addressed coping with stress, but the paper does not report measured improvements in knowledge of self-care behaviors or stress coping. Its emotion-regulation finding concerns emotional suppression, not a general improvement in emotional regulation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cohen J (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  2. Farb NAS, Anderson AK, Irving JA, & Segal ZV (2014). Mindfulness interventions and emotion regulation. In Gross JJ (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation, 2nd ed. (pp. 548– 567). Guilford Press.
  3. Wang L, Lu Y, & Li Z (2007). Emotion regulation questionnaire: Application in youth (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 15(3), 236– 238.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, S., Lin, D., Goldberg, S., Shen, Z., Chen, P., Qiao, S., Brewer, J., Loucks, E., & Operario, D.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
Journal of Counseling Psychology
Published
2022-03
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
157-171
ISSN
  • 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2168
OpenAlex
W3181587562
Cited by
138
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 3
FWCI
24.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Providence/Boston Center for AIDS Research (P30AI042853)
  • National Institutes of Health (K23AT011173, K23AT010879)
  • Beijing Normal University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, mobile health, COVID-19 quarantine, university students, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, social support, emotional suppression, young adults, feasibility and acceptability, psychological impact of pandemic
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Depression, Humans, Quarantine, Students, Universities, Telemedicine, Young Adult, Pandemics, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review