Cited by 231Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Predictors of behavioral regulation in kindergarten: household chaos, parenting, and early executive functions.

Open access
Vernon-Feagans, Lynne, The Family Life Project Key Investigators, Willoughby, Michael, Garrett-Peters, Patricia·2016·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

Behavioral regulation is an important school readiness skill that has been linked to early executive function (EF) and later success in learning and school achievement. Although poverty and related risks, as well as negative parenting, have been associated with poorer EF and behavioral regulation, chaotic home environments may also play a role in understanding both early EF and later behavioral regulation at school age. To explore these relationships, a unique longitudinal and representative sample was used of 1,292 children born to mothers who lived in low-wealth rural America who were followed from birth into early elementary school. This study examined whether household chaos, which was measured across the first 3 years of life, predicted behavioral regulation in kindergarten above and beyond poverty-related variables. In addition, this study tested whether parent responsivity and acceptance behaviors, measured during the first 3 years of life, as well as EF skills, which were measured when children were 3 to 5 years of age, mediated the relationship between early household chaos and kindergarten behavioral regulation. Results suggested that household chaos disorganization indirectly predicted kindergarten behavioral regulation through intermediate impacts on parenting behaviors and children's early EF skills. These findings suggest the importance of early household chaos disorganization, the parenting environment, and early EF skills in understanding behavioral regulation above and beyond poverty-related risks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/dev0000087

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Executive function undergirds self-regulatory skills that are important to academic and life success.

    “Executive function was measured in this study because it undergirds self-regulatory skills that are important to academic and life success (Blair and Razza, 2007; Diamond, 2013; Vernon-Feagans et al., 2016); in fact, self-regulation at age 4 predicts health, wealth, and criminality outcomes at age 32 (Moffitt et al., 2011).”

    From Montessori Preschool Elevates and Equalizes Child Outcomes: A Longitudinal Study (2017) · cites this paper as Vernon-Feagans et al., 2016

    The opening passage (page not provided) describes executive-function skills as possible precursors to later behavioral regulation and links regulation with academic achievement. The Discussion (page not provided) reports that executive functions predicted kindergarten behavioral regulation. Our copy does not establish the broader claim about life success; the age-32 outcomes in the citing sentence are attributed to Moffitt et al., not to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Muthén LK Muthén BO Mplus Users Guide 1998-2013 Los Angeles, CA Seventh Edition
  2. Wachs TD Corapci F Raeff C Benson J Environmental chaos, development and parenting across cultures. Social and cognitive development in the context of individual, social and cultural processes 2003 54 83 Routledge New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vernon-Feagans, L., The Family Life Project Key Investigators, Willoughby, M., & Garrett-Peters, P.
Affiliations
  • RTI International (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2016-03
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
430-441
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2409961019
Cited by
231
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 3
FWCI
100.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (PO1HD039667)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
behavioral regulation, executive function, household chaos, parenting, poverty, school readiness, kindergarten, early childhood, rural children, mediation, family environment
MeSH terms
Child Behavior, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Male, Social Environment, Parenting, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review