Cited by 702Viral Infections and Immunology ResearchViral Infections and Outbreaks ResearchLiterature Analysis and Criticism

Enterovirus Surveillance - United States, 1970-2005: (540562006-001)

Khetsuriani, Nino, LaMonte-Fowlkes, Ashley, Oberste, M. Steven, Pallansch, Mark A.·2006·PsycEXTRA Dataset

Abstract

Problem Enteroviruses are common human viruses associated with various clinical syndromes, from minor febrile illness to severe, potentially fatal conditions (e.g., aseptic meningitis, paralysis, myocarditis, and neonatal enteroviral sepsis). Multiple enterovirus serotypes exist. Individual serotypes have different temporal patterns of circulation and often are associated with different clinical manifestations. Changes in circulating serotypes might be accompanied by large-scale outbreaks. Reporting period covered 1970-2005. DESCRIPTION OF SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM: The National Enterovirus Surveillance System (NESS) is a voluntary, passive surveillance system that has monitored trends in circulating enteroviruses since 1961. Enterovirus detections by serotype with specimen type, collection date, and demographic information are reported monthly by participating laboratories to CDC, which summarizes the data and disseminates the results. For this analysis, the available data set for 1970-1982 included only information on serotype and state for each report; complete records were available for 1983-2005. Results During 1970-2005, a total of 52,812 enterovirus detections were reported to NESS (29,772 of them during 1983-2005). Laboratory participation and the numbers of reports declined throughout the 1990s, but they increased again after 2000. The 15 most commonly reported enteroviruses accounted for 83.5% of reports with known serotype, and the five most commonly reported serotypes (…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/e540562006-001

Cites

117 of 117 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khetsuriani, N., LaMonte-Fowlkes, A., Oberste, M. S., & Pallansch, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (US)
Venue
PsycEXTRA Dataset
Published
2006
Volume
55
Issue
8
Pages
1-20
OpenAlex
W2435523792
Cited by
702
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 36
Type
dataset
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PsycEXTRA Dataset (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Viral Infections and Immunology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Literature Analysis and Criticism
Keywords
enterovirus, enterovirus serotypes, echovirus, coxsackievirus B5, enterovirus 70, enterovirus 71, coxsackievirus A9, enterovirus D68, enterovirus 30
MeSH terms
Enterovirus Infections, Enterovirus, Humans, Population Surveillance, Serotyping, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review