The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group.
Abstract
IT is a frequent observation that persons who go through a great deal of trouble or pain to attain something tend to value it more highly than persons who attain the same thing with a minimum of effort. For example, one would expect persons who travel a great distance to see a motion picture to be more impressed with it than those who see the same picture at a neighborhood theater. By the same token, individuals who go through a severe initiation to gain admission to a club or organization should tend to think more highly of that organization than those who do not go through the severe initiation to gain admission. Two questions are relevant here: 1. Is this "common observation " valid, that is, does it hold true when tested under cotrolled conditions? 2. If the observation is valid, how can it be accounted for? The relationship might be simply a result of differences in initial motivation. To take the case of initiations, persons who initially have a strong desire to join a particular club should be more willing to undergo unpleasantness to gain admission to it than persons who are low in initial interest. Therefore, a club that requires a severe initiation for admission should be joined only by those people with a strong desire to become members. On the other hand, a club that does not require a severe initiation should be joined by some individuals who like it very much, and by others who are relatively uninterested. Because of this self-selection, one would expect persons who are members of clubs with severe initiations to think more highly of their club, on the average, than members of clubs without severe initiations. But is there something in the initiation itself
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The more painful these shocks were, the more strongly the subjects felt towards the group (Gerard & Mathewson, 1966, see also Aronson & Mills, 1959, Ma, Meng, Wang, & Shen, 2014).”
From Conative Dissonance (2026) · cites this paper as Aronson & Mills, 1959
In the citing paper
“Here, the ritual culture is portrayed in rigid drills that involve synchronous marching, chanting, and other regimented behaviors that ensure order and high levels of motivation (e.g., Aronson & Mills, 1959;King, 2013;McNeill, 1995;Mills & Mintz, 1972).”
From The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework (2018) · cites this paper as Aronson & Mills, 1959
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 864
Blackie, L. E. R., & Jayawickreme, E. (2014) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.1970 · Cited by 35
Comments on the Utility of Compliance‐Gaining Message Selection Tasks
Boster, F. (1988) · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1988.tb00179.x · Cited by 20
Werth, L., Denzler, M., & Mayer, J. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53897-5_7 · Cited by 4
Zentall, T. (2013) · doi:10.3819/ccbr.2013.80004 · Cited by 20
“The beauty of the Aronson and Mills (1959) design is that it easily can be adapted for use with animals because one can train an animal that a large effort is required to obtain one reinforcer whereas a small effort is required to obtain a different reinforcer.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHow Much Is Enough? The Relationship Between Prosocial Effort and Moral Character Judgments
Berry, Z., & Lucas, B. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672221135954 · Cited by 19
“Similarly, effortful initiation can increase the perceived value of a social group (Aronson & Mills, 1959).”
BackgroundJarvis, H., Stevenson, I., Huynh, A. Q., Babbage, E., Coxon, J., & Chong, T. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.31234/osf.io/rqjt3 · Cited by 19
“In contrast, when an action is evaluated retrospectively, effort tends to inflate the value of a realized reward (Aronson and Mills, 1959; Alessandri et al., 2008; L. Wang et al., 2017).”
BackgroundSunderrajan, A., & Albarracín, D. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104105 · Cited by 33
“For example, when participants built a storage box (versus simply inspecting one that had already been built), they were not only willing to pay more for it but also liked it more (Norton et al., 2012; see also Aronson & Mills, 1959; Brehm, Wright, Solomon, Silka, & Greenberg, 1983).”
BackgroundExplaining how group model building supports enduring agreement
Scott, R. (2019) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/jmo.2017.12 · Cited by 19
“Individuals are likely to have more positive feelings for objects created through great effort (Aronson & Mills, 1959).”
BackgroundWhen Going Along Gets You Nowhere and the Upside of Conflict Behaviors
Cikara, M., & Paluck, E. L. (2013) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12047 · Cited by 19
“…converge to maximize this commitment: we observe our own cooperative behavior and justify the associated effort (Bem, 1972; effort justification; Aronson & Mills, 1959); others also observe our behaviors, making it difficult for us to act incongruently in subsequent situations (consistency,…”
BackgroundSuperfluous Choices and the Persistence of Preference
Muthukrishnan, A. V., & Wathieu, L. (2007) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/510229 · Cited by 18
“…confusion and hesitation and heighten uncertainty in beliefs and preferences (Schwarz 2004; Wilson and Schooler 1991), a superfluous choice step that requires a perplexing trade-off might add preference ambiguity (instead of insufflate confidence) and dispel the preference persistence effect.”
What Suboptimal Choice Tells Us About the Control of Behavior
Zentall, T. (2019) · Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews · doi:10.3819/ccbr.2019.140001 · Cited by 19
“When a similar effect has been found in humans (e.g., Aronson & Mills, 1959), it has been referred to as the justification of effort effect; however, we prefer to interpret this preference as a contrast effect.”
BackgroundThe Distress-Relief Dynamic in Attachment Bonding
Beckes, L., & Coan, J. A. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-9622-9_2 · Cited by 26
“Similarly, threatening and painful events can motivate increased group identification (e.g., Aronson and Mills 1959), even when the pain and threat find their source within the very group with which one identifies.”
BackgroundMüller, P. (2013) · doi:10.1177/1748048513482546 · Cited by 18
“This finding is in line with Tsfati and Livio’s (2008) argument that journalists have to perceive a positive social influence of the media for reasons of ‘effort justification’ (Aronson and Mills, 1959).”
ResultThe Psychology of Removing Group Members and Recruiting New Ones
Zander, A. (1976) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872677602901005 · Cited by 18
Liking for a Group Following an Initiation: Impression Management or Dissonance Reduction?
Schlenker, B. R. (1975) · doi:10.2307/2786235 · Cited by 18
Responses to Death and Sex Stimulus Materials as a Function of Repression-Sensitization
Paris, J., & Goodstein, L. D. (1966) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1966.19.3f.1283 · Cited by 18
Auditing with Data and Analytics: External Reviewer Perceptions of Audit Quality and EffortPreprint
Mauldin, E. G., Emett, S. A., Kaplan, S. E., & Pickerd, J. S. (2020) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3544973 · Cited by 17
Poster: Paving the way into virtual reality - A transition in five stages
Sproll, D., Freiberg, J., Grechkin, T., & Riecke, B. (2013) · IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces · doi:10.1109/3dui.2013.6550235 · Cited by 17
“and create a more compelling experience by exploiting the effortjustification paradigm [1].”
BackgroundLaszlo, A., Laszlo, K., & Johnsen, C. (2009) · Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change · doi:10.1386/jots.6.1.29_1 · Cited by 17
Within-trial contrast: When you see it and when you don’t
Zentall, T. (2008) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/lb.36.1.19 · Cited by 17
Gidron, Y., & Davidson, K. W. (1996) · Journal of behavioral medicine · doi:10.1007/bf01857766 · Cited by 17
Triads: A laboratory analogue.
Weick, K. E., & Penner, D. D. (1966) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(66)90012-2 · Cited by 17
The role of costly commitment signals in assorting cooperators during intergroup conflict
Lang, M., Chvaja, R., & Purzycki, B. G. (2024) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.01.003 · Cited by 20
Workplace hazing in nursing: An integrative literature review
Kristensen, A. K., Kristensen, M. L., & Mikkelsen, E. G. (2023) · Health Sciences Review · doi:10.1016/j.hsr.2023.100120 · Cited by 16
Physical effort paradox during reward evaluation and links to perceived control
Wu, M., & Zheng, Y. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhad207 · Cited by 20
What consumers think about product self-assembly: Insights from big data
Safi, R. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.003 · Cited by 20
Cimino, A., & Thomas, B. (2022) · Evolution and human behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2022.07.001 · Cited by 16
“The first such experiment was famously conducted by Aronson and Mills (1959).”
BackgroundInfluentialIdeas are cheap: When and why adults value labor over ideas.
Burgmer, P., Forstmann, M., & Stavrova, O. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000473 · Cited by 20
“…from dissonance reduction via effort justification (e.g., increased liking of a group after having invested great effort to become a member; Aronson & Mills, 1959) to the IKEA effect (valuation of mundane objects such as standardized IKEA boxes upon having folded them oneself as opposed to…”
BackgroundCognitive Consistency in Social Cognition
Brannon, S. M., & Gawronski, B. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.314 · Cited by 39
“In one study supporting this prediction (Aronson & Mills, 1959), participants learned they could join a group only by passing an initial test in which they were asked to read a series of words aloud from a set of cards.”
BackgroundIndecision and the construction of self
Newark, D. A. (2014) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.07.005 · Cited by 19
Past decisions do affect future choices: An experimental demonstration
Arad, A. (2013) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.01.006 · Cited by 18
“…does not apply to the two other paradigms that were used to study dissonance reduction: the induced compliance paradigm (e.g. Festinger & Carlsmith, 1959; and Linder, Cooper & Jones, 1967) and the effort justification paradigm (e.g. Aronson and Mills, 1959; and Wicklund, Cooper & Linder, 1967).”
Children and the economics of Christmas gift-giving
Tremblay, C., & Tremblay, V. J. (1995) · doi:10.1080/135048595357087 · Cited by 16
Was Cognitive Dissonance Theory a Mistake
Lord, C. G. (1992) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0304_12 · Cited by 16
Effective Followership: Leadership Turned Upside Down
Vecchio, R. P. (1970) · Journal of business strategies · doi:10.2307/j.ctvpg85tk.14 · Cited by 16
“A dramatic illustration of this phenomenon comes from a classic social science study by Eliott Aronson and Judson Mills [1].”
BackgroundThe social creation of action and inaction: From concepts to goals to behaviors
Albarracín, D., Sunderrajan, A., Dai, W., & White, B. X. (2019) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2019.04.001 · Cited by 25
A public health approach to preventing hazing on a university campus
Marchell, T. C., Santacrose, L. B., Laurita, A. C., & Allan, E. J. (2022) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448481.2021.2024210 · Cited by 15
“19 The contrast between the harshness of being hazed and the outcome of being enthusiastically accepted into the group may increase the experience of being rewarded for enduring the hazing.”
BackgroundCan't Let It Go: Hate in Interpersonal Relationships
Aumer, K., Bahn, A. C. K., Janicki, C., Guzman, N., Pierson, N. W., Strand, S., & Totlund, H. (2016) · Journal of Relationships Research · doi:10.1017/jrr.2016.2 · Cited by 15
“Given effort justification theory (Aronson & Mills, 1959) and cognitive dissonance theory (Festinger, 1962), the more time spent with and knowing someone may facilitate the desire to justify that time and to see the relationship and person as more desirable and satisfying than relationships without…”
BackgroundInfluentialHED: A Computational Model of Affective Adaptation and Emotion Dynamics
Steephen, J. E. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/t-affc.2013.2 · Cited by 13
“People sometimes recover faster from intensely painful experiences than less distressing ones [15], [16], [17], [18], [19] as intense emotions possibly cause the recruitment of an assortment of defensive psychological processes that try to weaken them [20], [21].”
BackgroundDetermining Whether a Patient is Feeling Better: Pitfalls from the Science of Human Perception
Redelmeier, D. A., & Dickinson, V. M. (2011) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1655-3 · Cited by 57
The Anticipation of a Severe Initiation
Lodewijkx, H. F. M., van Zomeren, M., & Syroit, J. (2005) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496404272381 · Cited by 14
“It was not the purpose of the present study to examine the more intricate psychological mechanisms underlying the cognitive dissonance explanation of the effects of a severe initiation, as formulated by Aronson and Mills (1959).”
BackgroundInfluentialExploring the Effects of Professional Education on Salespeople: The Case of Autonomous Agents
Izzo, G., & Vitell, S. J. (2003) · doi:10.1080/10696679.2003.11658506 · Cited by 15
Feeling Bad to Feel Good: Comments and Observations
Schaller, M. (1993) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1403_3 · Cited by 15
Why Operationism Doesn't Go Away: Extrascientific Incentives of Social-Psychological Research
Rosenwald, G. C. (1986) · doi:10.1177/004839318601600302 · Cited by 15
“For example, Aronson and Mills (1959) asked college girls to read a list of obscene words to a male experimenter, intending this exercise to be an embarrassing initiation rite.”
BackgroundThe application of cognitive dissonance theory to consultation
Hughes, J. (1983) · doi:10.1016/0022-4405(83)90048-1 · Cited by 15
Being liked and teaching: The effects and bases of personal likability in college instruction
Uranowitz, S. W., & Doyle, K. O. (1978) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/bf00979185 · Cited by 15
Effects of Competence and Consensual Validation on a Communicator's Liking for the Audience.
Sigall, H. (1970) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0030603 · Cited by 15
A Visualization Approach to Addressing Reviewer Bias in Holistic College Admissions
Sukumar, P. T., & Metoyer, R. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95831-6_12 · Cited by 16
Unpacking the dynamic role of physical effort in shaping behavior
Cheval, B., Maltagliati, S., Desplanques, F., & Wolff, W. (2025) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2025.04.012 · Cited by 16
A cognitive dissonance approach to moderating listener perception of L2 English speakers
Miao, Y., Moran, M., & Kang, O. (2023) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434632.2023.2236073 · Cited by 14
“There are many empirical studies to support the cognitive dissonance theory, with more studies in the past conducted in a laboratory setting (e.g. Aronson and Mills 1959; Brehm 1956; Festinger, Riecken, and Schachter 1956).”
When the Numbers Do Not Add Up: The Practical Limits of Stochastologicals for Soft Psychology
Broers, N. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620970557 · Cited by 14
“At around the same time as the Festinger and Carlsmith study, another important study on the effect of cognitive dissonance was conducted by Aronson and Mills (1959),6 who showed that the appreciation of a boring discussion group was affected by the severity of the initiation procedure that preceded it. In their study…”
BackgroundInfluential‘Get out of my fandom, newbie’: A cross-fandom study of elitism and gatekeeping in fans
Plante, C., Reysen, S., Chadborn, D., Roberts, S. E., & Gerbasi, K. C. (2020) · The Journal of Fandom Studies · doi:10.1386/jfs_00013_1 · Cited by 14
How peoples’ ratings of dental implant treatment change over time?
Machuca, C., Vettore, M., & Robinson, P. (2020) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-019-02408-1 · Cited by 14
Identity and the Self‐Reinforcing Effects of Norm Compliance
Pickup, M., Kimbrough, E. O., & Rooij, E. D. (2019) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.1002/soej.12410 · Cited by 14
Why Hazing? Measuring the Motivational Mechanisms of Newcomer Induction in College Fraternities
McCreary, G., & Schutts, J. (2019) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/15685373-12340063 · Cited by 14
Swapan, A. Y., Bay, J., & Marinova, D. (2019) · Journal of Green Building, College Publishing, USA · doi:10.3992/1943-4618.14.2.177 · Cited by 14
“…of members’ position and status in the group—for instance, homeowners who invest time and energy will experience more intense emotional involvement; and intimacy is a kind of investment (Aronson and Mills 1959; Peterson and Martens 1972); and (5) spiritual bond is common in each community.”
BackgroundCommitment theory: do behaviors enhance the perceived attractiveness of tourism destinations?
Chang, S., & Stansbie, P. (2018) · The Tourist Review · doi:10.1108/tr-03-2017-0058 · Cited by 14
When Does Money Make Money More Important? Survey and Experimental Evidence
DeVoe, S. E., Pfeffer, J., & Lee, B. Y. (2013) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.1177/001979391306600503 · Cited by 33
Preference for the Outcome That Follows a Relatively Aversive Event: Contrast or Delay Reduction?
Singer, R., & Zentall, T. (2011) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2011.06.001 · Cited by 14
“In traditional human research, preferences such as those reported here would typically be attributed to cognitive factors, such as cognitive dissonance (Festinger, 1957) or more specifically to a form of cognitive dissonance called justification of effort (Aronson & Mills, 1959).”
BackgroundGroup Identification and University Involvement1
Jackson, J. W., Miller, D., Frew, E. J., Gilbreath, B., & Dillman, C. (2011) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00736.x · Cited by 14
Vaidis, D. C. (2006) · Linx · doi:10.4000/linx.507 · Cited by 38
Manalo, E., Koyasu, M., Hashimoto, K., & Miyauchi, T. (2006) · doi:10.2117/psysoc.2006.114 · Cited by 14
When Am I My Group? Self-Enhancement Versus Self-Justification Accounts of Perceived Prototypicality
Burkley, M., & Blanton, H. (2005) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-005-8570-x · Cited by 14
“, 1984) and liking (Aronson and Mills, 1959).”
Lubek, I., & Apfelbaum, E. (2000) · Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1002/1520-6696(200023)36:4 · Cited by 18
Reliable, Silent, Hysterical, or Assured: in Their Medical Decision Making
Geist, P., & Hardesty, M. J. (1990) · Health Communication · doi:10.1207/s15327027hc0202_2 · Cited by 14
Discrepant Membership as an Occasion for Effective Cooperation
Weick, K. E., & Penner, D. D. (1969) · Sociometry · doi:10.2307/2786544 · Cited by 14
When and how does labour lead to love? The ontogeny and mechanisms of the IKEA effect
Marsh, L. E., Kanngießer, P., & Hood, B. M. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.012 · Cited by 69
“Study 2 実験2では IKEA 効果が努力の正当化に起因するかどうかを評価する(Aronson and Mills, 1959, Benozio and Diesendruck, 2015, Festinger, 1957) 努力の正当化とは、努力した仕事を完了したことに対する報酬として与えられた報酬を過大評 価するバイアスである(Aronson&Mills、1959) 努力の正当化が IKEA 効果のメカニズムである場合、タスクに費やす努力の量(モンスター全体を作 成するか、一部を作成するか)によって IKEA 効果の大きさが異なることになる …”
Shah, J. A., & Lacaze, D. (2025) · International journal of organizational analysis · doi:10.1108/ijoa-07-2024-4694 · Cited by 17
Relationship between reward-related brain activity and opportunities to sit
Parma, J. O., Bacelar, M. F. B., Cabral, D. A. R., Recker, R. S., Orsholits, D., Renaud, O., Sander, D., Krigolson, O. E., Miller, M. W., Cheval, B., et al. (2023) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2023.06.011 · Cited by 15
“Second, our results relied on a stringent alpha level (.02) and our statistical power was high (beta = .90), including over 60 participants.”
MethodBoals, A., Jayawickreme, E., & Park, C. L. (2022) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2022.2109200 · Cited by 22
“From this view, perceived growth may be seen as a form of motivated cognition in response to a need to provide a convincing explanation for their personality or lack of depreciation in the wake of adversity (Aronson & Mills, 1959; Seery & Kondrak, 2014).”
BackgroundDisengagement in Open Innovation: A Cognitive Perspective
Bhimani, H., Mention, A., & Salampasis, D. (2022) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12594 · Cited by 22
The power of norms to sway fused group members
Louis, W. R., McGarty, C., Thomas, E. F., Amiot, C. E., & Moghaddam, F. M. (2018) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x18001644 · Cited by 3
Galen, L. W. (2017) · Method & Theory in the Study of Religion · doi:10.1163/15700682-12341393 · Cited by 15
What does being initiated severely into a group do? The role of rewards.
Kamau, C. (2013) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00207594.2012.663957 · Cited by 13
“Since Aronson and Mills’ (1959) seminal experiment, there have been only six laboratory studies on the topic (Finer et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHedonic evaluations of cars: Effects of payment mode on prediction and experience†
Hoelzl, E., Pollai, M., & Kastner, H. (2011) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20419 · Cited by 13
Bringing Cognitive Dissonance to the Classroom
Carkenord, D. M., & Bullington, J. (1993) · doi:10.1207/s15328023top2001_9 · Cited by 13
The Effect of Perceived Age on Initial Impressions and Normative Role Expectations
Lawrence, J. H. (1974) · The International Journal of Aging & Human Development · doi:10.2190/2fu7-bgvt-qm43-kfeg · Cited by 13
Albarracín, D., Sunderrajan, A., & Dai, W. (2018) · Nebraska Symposium on Motivation/The Nebraska symposium on motivation · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96920-6_3 · Cited by 13
Neuroscientific and Psychological Approaches to Incentives
Murayama, K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316823279.008 · Cited by 31
Pain, Fear, and Circumcision in Boys’ Adolescent Initiation Ceremonies
Schlegel, A., & Barry, H. (2017) · Cross-Cultural Research · doi:10.1177/1069397116685780 · Cited by 12
“Having successfully endured the rigors of the initiation, the new initiates tend to value the group and their membership in it more than if the initiation had not inflicted physical or mental suffering (Aronson & Mills, 1959; Gerard & Mathewson, 1966).”
BackgroundWlnslow, D. (2008) · doi:10.1111/j.1755-618x.1998.tb00727.x · Cited by 12
Speculations on a Privileged State of Cognitive Dissonance
Montell, C. (2001) · doi:10.1111/1468-5914.00151 · Cited by 12
“Be careful what you wish for…”: A quantitative and qualitative investigation of “fata1 attractions”
Felmlee, D. H. (1998) · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00170.x · Cited by 12
Postdecisional Dissonance and the Commodified Self-Concept: A Cross-Cultural Examination
Murphy, P., & Miller, C. T. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167297231006 · Cited by 12
Dissonance Theory: A Cognitive Psychology With an Engine
Gerard, H. (1992) · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0304_6 · Cited by 12
When Prophecy Pales: The Fate of Dissonance Theory
Weick, K. E. (1965) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1965.16.3c.1261 · Cited by 12
“Findings are Interpretable in Non-dissonance F~anzeworks In commenting upon :he results of the Aronson and Mills (1959) study of severity of initiation, Chapanis and Chapanis (1964, pp. 4-5) pose four alternative explanacions of the finding that girls who passed a severe initiation to join a group,…”
BackgroundDogmatism and Individual Differences in Reduction of Dissonance
Fillenbaum, S. (1964) · doi:10.2466/pr0.1964.14.1.47 · Cited by 12
“Essentially, the experiment was a replication and extension cf some earlier work by Aronson and Mills (1959) which had indicated that persons who undergo an unpleasant initiation in order to join a group like the group more than people who are spared such an initiation.”
BackgroundMethodHong, E., & Rao, A. L. (2020) · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44754-0 · Cited by 12
Attitude change as a function of the number of words in which thoughts are expressed
Gandarillas, B., Briñol, P., Petty, R., & Díaz, D. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.012 · Cited by 12
Clarifying concepts in cognitive dissonance theory
Harmon‐Jones, E. (2017) · Animal Sentience · doi:10.51291/2377-7478.1199 · Cited by 12
“Mills (Aronson & Mills, 1959), who conducted the first effort-justification experiment, explained quite precisely why effort should evoke dissonance.”
BackgroundWhy Sing and Dance: an Examination of the Cooperative Effects of Group Synchrony
Reddish, P. (2012) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17003458.v1 · Cited by 9
“Moreover, because synchronised walking in public is contra-normative compared to walking normally in a group, the activity may have generated unintended negative affect, which is known to enhance cohesion (Aronson & Mills, 1959).”
BackgroundBody alteration: On the mental function of body modification and body decoration
Weiler, S. M., Mühlenbeck, C., & Jacobsen, T. (2024) · Culture & Psychology · doi:10.1177/1354067x241242414 · Cited by 13
“…to cause cognitive dissonance that might result in increased group af fi nity following a rite of passage — that is, a higher sense of group belonging through rewards and higher conformity among new group members (Aronson & Mills, 1959; Festinger, 1961; Kamau, 2013; Keating et al., 2005) may occur.”
Pao, H.-N., Jackson, E., Yang, T.-S., Tsai, J., Hwang, Y.-T., Sung, W. H., & Pfeiffer, D. (2023) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2023.1070482 · Cited by 11
Malmio, I. (2022) · Norma · doi:10.1080/18902138.2022.2033543 · Cited by 11
“…the purpose of strengthening the individuals commitment to the group, as was highlighted in an experimental study performed by Aronson and Mills in the 1950s, which revealed that an initiate who endures severe hazing is likely to find membership in that group more appealing (Aronson & Mills, 1959).”
BackgroundFrom cash to crickets: The non-monetary value of a resource can promote human cooperation
Bastian, B., Brewer, M., Duffy, J., & van Lange, P. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.11.002 · Cited by 11
Unnecessary force by police: insights from evolutionary psychology
James, L., Todak, N., & Savage, J. (2018) · Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice · doi:10.1093/police/pay025 · Cited by 11
Tsukamoto, M., Kohara, K., & Takeuchi, K. (2017) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/s13420-016-0248-8 · Cited by 11
“For example, Aronson and Mills (1959) manipulated task difficult and reported that participants who were required to read some embarrassing sexual descriptions in order to join a discussion group placed greater value on the group as the severity of the required task increased.”
BackgroundResultIt Happens, Just Not to Me: Hazing on a Canadian University Campus
Massey, K., & Massey, J. (2017) · Journal of College and Character · doi:10.1080/2194587x.2016.1260477 · Cited by 11
“Aronson and Mills (1959) and Gerard and Mathewson (1966) analyzed the responses of two groups of students to joining discussion groups after enduring embarrassing, effortful, or painful initiation tasks.”
BackgroundFighting on: emotion and conflict termination
Payne, K. F. (2015) · Cambridge Review of International Affairs · doi:10.1080/09557571.2014.888539 · Cited by 11
Initiation, Hazing or Orientation? A case study at a South African University
de Klerk, V. (2013) · International Research in Education · doi:10.5296/ire.v1i1.4026 · Cited by 11
“…identity tends to override personal identity in certain contexts where belonging and fitting in is important, and with cognitive dissonance theory (Aronson & Mills, 1959; Keating et al., 2005), in terms of which people tend to attribute a greater value to something they had to put a lot of effort…”
BackgroundValue From Adversity: How We Deal With Adversity Matters
Higgins, E. T., Marguc, J., & Scholer, A. A. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.012 · Cited by 11
“According to other psychological perspectives, such as cognitive dissonance theory (e.g., Aronson & Mills, 1959; Festinger, 1957), reactance theory (e.g., Brehm, 1966; Brehm & Brehm, 1981; Wicklund, 1974), or motivational intensity theory (e.g., Brehm & Self, 1989; Brehm et al., 1983), adversity…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Aronson, E., & Mills, J.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1959-09
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-181
- ISSN
- 0096-851X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037252822
- Cited by
- 1,297
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 117 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 39.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Keywords
- initiation, group preferences, self-selection, initial motivation, group membership
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review