The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group.
Abstract
IT is a frequent observation that persons who go through a great deal of trouble or pain to attain something tend to value it more highly than persons who attain the same thing with a minimum of effort. For example, one would expect persons who travel a great distance to see a motion picture to be more impressed with it than those who see the same picture at a neighborhood theater. By the same token, individuals who go through a severe initiation to gain admission to a club or organization should tend to think more highly of that organization than those who do not go through the severe initiation to gain admission. Two questions are relevant here: 1. Is this "common observation " valid, that is, does it hold true when tested under cotrolled conditions? 2. If the observation is valid, how can it be accounted for? The relationship might be simply a result of differences in initial motivation. To take the case of initiations, persons who initially have a strong desire to join a particular club should be more willing to undergo unpleasantness to gain admission to it than persons who are low in initial interest. Therefore, a club that requires a severe initiation for admission should be joined only by those people with a strong desire to become members. On the other hand, a club that does not require a severe initiation should be joined by some individuals who like it very much, and by others who are relatively uninterested. Because of this self-selection, one would expect persons who are members of clubs with severe initiations to think more highly of their club, on the average, than members of clubs without severe initiations. But is there something in the initiation itself
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The more painful these shocks were, the more strongly the subjects felt towards the group (Gerard & Mathewson, 1966, see also Aronson & Mills, 1959, Ma, Meng, Wang, & Shen, 2014).”
From Conative Dissonance (2026) · cites this paper as Aronson & Mills, 1959
In the citing paper
“Here, the ritual culture is portrayed in rigid drills that involve synchronous marching, chanting, and other regimented behaviors that ensure order and high levels of motivation (e.g., Aronson & Mills, 1959;King, 2013;McNeill, 1995;Mills & Mintz, 1972).”
From The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework (2018) · cites this paper as Aronson & Mills, 1959
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317
“For example, in the initiation experiment (Aronson & Mills, 1959), subjects did a lot of denying when asked if the punishment had affected their attitudes toward the group or had entered into their thinking at all.”
MethodToward a positive theory of consumer choice
Thaler, R. H. (1980) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7 · Cited by 5,796
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904
“One way to minimize dissonance would be to redouble one's commitment and support for the system, much as hazed initiates pledge increased loyalty to the fraternity that hazes them (e.g., Aronson & Mills, 1959) and, presumably, to the fraternity system in general.”
BackgroundEffects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation.
Deci, E. L. (1971) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0030644 · Cited by 4,170
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.293 · Cited by 3,991
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,583
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004 · Cited by 3,476
The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x · Cited by 3,558
“IW9; Mc(:ll~rc, 1991 ; McLaughlin, Cody & Read, 1992; Tajfel, 1 ga la , 6) (b) their own thoughts, feelings, and behavioun (e.g. Aronson & Mills, 1959; Festinger & Carlsmich, 1959; Grecnwald, 1980; Manhall & Zimbardo, 1979; Monson & Snyder, 1977; Schachter & Singer, 1962; Schwarz & Clore, 1988,…”
BackgroundNorm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives.
Kahneman, D. J., & Miller, D. T. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.93.2.136 · Cited by 3,247
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003435 · Cited by 4,481
Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(85)90049-4 · Cited by 2,573
“Numerous studies have shown that once a subject is induced to expend effort on an onerous task, the task is revalued upward (e.g., Aronson & Mills, 1959).”
BackgroundRelation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem.
Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L., & Boden, J. M. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.5 · Cited by 2,378
“Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment.”
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2648573 · Cited by 2,298
The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence
Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1992) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90013-r · Cited by 1,866
The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences
Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., & Tversky, A. (1985) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(85)90010-6 · Cited by 1,649
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x · Cited by 1,629
“... by an undergraduate class lecture on John Darley’s and Bibb Latane´’s studies of bystander intervention (e.g., Darley & Latane´, 1968) or on Stanley Milgram’s (1975) obedience studies, which put real people into emotionally powerful situations and then watched whatthey did.Evenmanyclassicstudies ofinnervariablessu…”
BackgroundSlovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006 · Cited by 1,537
Petry, L., Robinson, E., & Kirk, V. (1958) · Journal of the Royal Naval Medical Service · doi:10.2307/3118552 · Cited by 1,491
Support theory: a nonextensional representation of subjective probability
Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.547 · Cited by 1,167
Support Theory: A Nonextensional Representation of Subjective Probability
Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.027 · Cited by 8
The IKEA effect: When labor leads to love
Norton, M. I., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.002 · Cited by 1,049
Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance
Schneider, L., Brehm, J., & Cohen, A. (1962) · doi:10.2307/2575703 · Cited by 1,013
The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance: A Current Perspective
Aronson, E. (1969) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60075-1 · Cited by 950
Self-citationValue from hedonic experience and engagement
Higgins, E. T. (2006) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.3.439 · Cited by 949
“In addition to this " dissonance " explanation, the conditions of this and other " effort justification " studies (e.g., Aronson & Mills, 1959; Axsom & Cooper, 1985; Zimbardo, 1965) suggest that strength of engagement might contribute to the outcomes of such studies.”
BackgroundLott, A., & Lott, B. (1965) · Psychological bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0022386 · Cited by 832
The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning.
Nisbett, R. E., Krantz, D. H., Jepson, C., & Kunda, Z. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.339 · Cited by 836
The Effect of Effort on Sales Performance and Job Satisfaction
Brown, S. P., & Peterson, R. A. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800206 · Cited by 768
Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships.
van Lange, P., Rusbult, C., Drigotas, S. M., Arriaga, X. B., Witcher, B. S., & Cox, C. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1373 · Cited by 770
“…self-perception processes, for example, John's acts of sacrifice may serve to enhance his feelings of commitment (e.g., "I deviated from what would seem to be in my self-interest, thereby benefitting my partner, so I must be committed to my relationship"; Aronson & Mills, 1959; D. J. Bern, 1972).”
BackgroundDunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1082 · Cited by 758
The Effort Paradox: Effort Is Both Costly and Valued
Inzlicht, M., Shenhav, A., & Olivola, C. Y. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.007 · Cited by 977
“For example, a person who worked hard to gain entry into a group will like that group more than a second person who did not work hard to acquire group membership, even though both people are evaluating the same group [68].”
BackgroundResistance of personal risk perceptions to debiasing interventions.
Weinstein, N. D., & Klein, W. M. P. (1995) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//0278-6133.14.2.132 · Cited by 614
Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems.
Walton, G. M., & Wilson, T. D. (2018) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000115 · Cited by 617
Counseling: An interpersonal influence process.
Strong, S. R. (1968) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0020229 · Cited by 614
Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: Responses to dissatisfaction in romantic involvements.
Rusbult, C., Zembrodt, I. M., & Gunn, L. K. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.6.1230 · Cited by 610
The alleged crisis and the illusion of exact replication
Stroebe, W., & Strack, F. (2014) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691613514450 · Cited by 597
“” Is the discovery of the Aronson and Mills (1959) study their empirical finding that girls who had to read aloud fourletter words evaluated a group discussion of the sex life of lower animals more positively than girls who had to”
BackgroundInfluentialWhen group membership gets personal: a theory of identity fusion.
Swann, W. B., Jetten, J., Gómez, Á., Whitehouse, H., & Bastian, B. (2012) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0028589 · Cited by 862
“To the extent that humans are “creatures of concreteness” (Nisbett, Borgida, Crandall, & Reed, 1976), such experiences may be particu- 6 People theoretically experience dissonance only insofar as the relevant actions are freely chosen (e.g., Aronson & Mills, 1959; Gerard & Mathewson, 1966).”
BackgroundJost, J. T. (2019) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12297 · Cited by 567
“It also fit with classic demonstrations of cognitive dissonance theory, including cases of fraternity pledges who were badly ‘hazed’ becoming fanatical supporters of the Greek system (Aronson & Mills, 1959; Gerard & Mathewson, 1966).”
BackgroundChen, X.-P., Hui, C., & Sego, D. (1998) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.922 · Cited by 565
The Return of the Repressed: Dissonance Theory Makes a Comeback
Aronson, E. (1992) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0304_1 · Cited by 603
Self-citationEVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE AS A FUNCTION OF PERFORMER'S REWARD AND ATTRACTIVENESS.
Lerner, M. J. (1965) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0021806 · Cited by 556
Giving Firms an “E” for Effort: Consumer Responses to High-Effort Firms
Morales, A. C. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/426615 · Cited by 544
Cooper, J., & Carlsmith, K. M. (2001) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/01802-7 · Cited by 27
“A classic dissonance experiment by Aronson and Mills (1959) demonstrates the basic idea.”
BackgroundThe Ties That Bind Us: Ritual, Fusion, and Identification
Whitehouse, H., & Lanman, J. A. (2014) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/678698 · Cited by 509
Prentice, D. A., Miller, D. T., & Lightdale, J. (1994) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167294205005 · Cited by 480
Kalyanaraman, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2006) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00006.x · Cited by 475
“Membership refers to the feeling that individuals have devoted a part of themselves to become a member and therefore believe that they have a certain entitlement to belong ( Aronson & Mills, 1959 ).”
BackgroundPersonal narratives about guilt: Role in action control and interpersonal relationships.
Baumeister, R., Stillwell, A., & Heatherton, T. (1995) · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1701 · Cited by 468
Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology.
Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2006) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/11383-000 · Cited by 497
Aronson, E. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0088188 · Cited by 458
Self-citationIncorporating the Irrelevant: Anchors in Judgments of Belief and Value
Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.008 · Cited by 424
Extreme Rituals Promote Prosociality
Xygalatas, D., Mitkidis, P., Fischer, R., Reddish, P., Skewes, J., Geertz, A. W., Roepstorff, A., & Bulbulia, J. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612472910 · Cited by 442
“Classical findings from psychology (Aronson & Mills, 1959; Festinger, 1957; Tajfel, Billig, Bundy, & Flament, 1971) and evolutionary perspectives on parochial altruism (Choi & Bowles, 2007; Ginges, Hansen, & Norenzayan, 2009) suggest that ritual intensity is associated with subgroup identification.”
BackgroundSloman, S. A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.024 · Cited by 412
Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: Advances in support theory.
Rottenstreich, Y., & Tversky, A. (1997) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.406 · Cited by 446
Predicting Continued Participation in Newsgroups
Joyce, E., & Kraut, R. E. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00033.x · Cited by 376
Debiasing the Mind Through Meditation: Mindfulness and the Sunk-Cost Bias
Hafenbrack, A. C., Kinias, Z., & Barsade, S. G. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613503853 · Cited by 354
“Explanations for the sunk-cost bias include loss aversion (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979), self-justification (Aronson & Mills, 1959), and the desire not to appear wasteful (Arkes & Blumer, 1985).”
BackgroundThe Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework
Hobson, N. M., Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Xygalatas, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868317734944 · Cited by 354
“Here, the ritual culture is portrayed in rigid drills that involve synchronous marching, chanting, and other regimented behaviors that ensure order and high levels of motivation (e.g., Aronson & Mills, 1959; King, 2013; McNeill, 1995; Mills & Mintz, 1972).”
Gain and loss of esteem as determinants of interpersonal attractiveness
Aronson, E., & Linder, D. E. (1965) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(65)90043-0 · Cited by 343
Self-citationDiverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties.
Phillips, K., Mannix, E., Neale, M., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.10.003 · Cited by 334
AI can help humans find common ground in democratic deliberation
Tessler, M. H., Bakker, M. A., Jarrett, D., Sheahan, H., Chadwick, M. J., Koster, R., Evans, G., Campbell-Gillingham, L., Collins, T., Parkes, D. C., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adq2852 · Cited by 318
“One risk in this evaluation is that revised statements might be preferred simply because they were encountered later and after a slight additional investment of effort, driving an effort justification bias ( 27 ).”
BackgroundA Review of Cognitive Dissonance Theory in Management Research
Hinojosa, A. S., Gardner, W. L., Walker, H. J., Cogliser, C. C., & Gullifor, D. P. (2016) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316668236 · Cited by 353
The effects of severity of initiation on liking for a group: A replication
Gerard, H. B., & Mathewson, G. C. (1966) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(66)90084-9 · Cited by 324
The Intertemporal Dynamics of Consumer Lock-in
Zauberman, G. (2003) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/378617 · Cited by 318
Revisiting the Retrospective Pretest
Hill, L. G., & Betz, D. (2005) · American Journal of Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1098214005281356 · Cited by 316
“Ironically, this tendency, called the effort justification bias (Aronson & Mills, 1959; Beauvois & Joule, 1996), is particularly strong when the experience has been unpleasant.”
BackgroundThe essential role of ritual in the transmission and reinforcement of social norms.
Rossano, M. J. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0027038 · Cited by 315
Dealing with dissonance: A review of cognitive dissonance reduction
McGrath, A. L. (2017) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12362 · Cited by 420
Imagining Can Heighten or Lower the Perceived Likelihood of Contracting a Disease
Sherman, S. J., Cialdini, R. B., Schwartzman, D. F., & Reynolds, K. D. (1985) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167285111011 · Cited by 400
Sosis, R. H. (2003) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-003-1000-6 · Cited by 431
“Several researchers ( Aronson and Mills 1959; Gerard and Mathewson 1966) have shown that individuals who pay higher initiation costs to enter a group are more satisfied with group membership than those who had little or no initiation costs for entry.”
BackgroundEffect of the severity of threat on the devaluation of forbidden behavior.
Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1963) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0039901 · Cited by 311
“In one experiment, subjects who expended a high degree of effort to attain an unattractive goal convinced themselves that the goal was indeed attractive—whereas subjects who expended little effort saw the goal as it was—@BULLET that is, unattractive (Aronson & Mills, 1959).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMaruna, S. (2011) · Punishment & Society · doi:10.1177/1462474510385641 · Cited by 301
“In a classic study of cognitive dissonance, Aronson and Mills (1959) examined the effects of initiation rites on subsequent views of an association.”
BackgroundAssessing uncertainty in physical constants
Henrion, M., & Fischhoff, B. (1986) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.14447 · Cited by 327
Loss-Avoidance and Forward Induction in Experimental Coordination Games
Cachon, G. P., & Camerer, C. F. (1996) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2946661 · Cited by 249
“See Arkes and Blumer [1985] , Aronson and Mills [1959] , Cialdini, Cacioppo, Bassett and Miller [1978) ,Freedman and Fraser [1966) , McGlothlin [1956] , and Staw [1976] . Thaler (1980] , uses the ten dency toward risk-preference in the domain of losses, from prospect theory (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979] to explain the…”
BackgroundEnemies of exploration: Self-initiated versus other-initiated learning.
Condry, J. C. (1977) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.7.459 · Cited by 274
Cognitive dissonance reduction as constraint satisfaction.
Shultz, T. R., & Lepper, M. R. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.2.219 · Cited by 360
Taking a Closer Look: Reasserting the Role of the Self-Concept in Dissonance Theory
Thibodeau, R., & Aronson, E. (1992) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167292185010 · Cited by 312
Self-citationAbelson, R. (1986) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1986.tb00078.x · Cited by 260
Masterson, S., & Stamper, C. L. (2003) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.203 · Cited by 259
Self-disclosure and student satisfaction with Facebook
Special, W. P., & Li-Barber, K. T. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.008 · Cited by 268
“…first, that satisfaction with Facebook could be derived purely through the amount of time and effort exerted in developing a Facebook page (Aronson & Mills, 1959), and second that levels of self-disclosure, potentially related to the desire to present a desirable online image to other…”
BackgroundInfluentialWalking in “wild” and “tended” urban forests: The impact on psychological well-being
Martens, D., Gutscher, H., & Bauer, N. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.11.001 · Cited by 246
Sport Commitment: A Model Integrating Enjoyment, Dropout, and Burnout
Schmidt, G. W., & Stein, G. (1991) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.13.3.254 · Cited by 227
Sigall, H., & Mills, J. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_5 · Cited by 232
Self-citationRothgerber, H. (2019) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2019.104511 · Cited by 286
When Healthy Food Makes You Hungry
Finkelstein, S. R., & Fishbach, A. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/652248 · Cited by 218
How choice affects and reflects preferences: Revisiting the free-choice paradigm.
Chen, M. K., & Risen, J. L. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020217 · Cited by 218
Schwarz, N., & Vaughn, L. A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.007 · Cited by 215
Liking versus loving: A comparative evaluation of theories.
Sternberg, R. J. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.102.3.331 · Cited by 214
Reconsidering Unreliability: Fallible and Untrustworthy Narrators
Olson, G. (2003) · doi:10.1353/nar.2003.0001 · Cited by 214
Brandt, M. J. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031751 · Cited by 248
Bonett, D., & Price, R. (2002) · Psychological methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.3.370 · Cited by 212
“After adding the required number of women to each group, if the lower limit for 3 − 2 is greater than 16 and the largest absolute limit for 2 − 1 is less than 16, only then can the researcher be 95% confident in stating the conclusions given by Aronson and Mills (1959).”
BackgroundMethodFrable, D. E. S., Wortman, C. B., & Joseph, J. G. (1997) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00328.x · Cited by 211
Uncertainty Reduction, Self-Enhancement, and Ingroup Identification
Reid, S., & Hogg, M. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204271708 · Cited by 210
“The first is that the uncertainty task, and perhaps other aspects of the study, caused participants to exert differential effort on behalf of the group and that effort exertion may have increased subsequent group commitment and identification (e.g., Aronson & Mills, 1959; Turner et al., 1984).”
BackgroundResultTeacher Expectation: Sociopsychological Dynamics
Braun, C. (1976) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170038 · Cited by 205
“Aronson and Mills' (1959) study showed tha t persons are generally unwilling to accept evidence tha t they are better or worse than they themselves have decided.”
BackgroundAn Action-Based Model of Cognitive-Dissonance Processes
Harmon‐Jones, E., Harmon‐Jones, C., & Levy, N. (2015) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721414566449 · Cited by 231
“To reduce this dissonance, individuals evaluate the reason for engaging in the effortful action more positively (Aronson & Mills, 1959).”
BackgroundPsychological determinants of decision attitude
Beattie, J., Baron, J., Hershey, J. C., & Spranca, M. D. (1994) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.3960070206 · Cited by 213
The evolution of extreme cooperation via shared dysphoric experiences
Whitehouse, H., Jong, J., Buhrmester, M. D., Gómez, Á., Bastian, B. B., Kavanagh, C. M., Newson, M., Matthews, M., Lanman, J. A., McKay, R., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep44292 · Cited by 224
“nature” games correspond to models of between-group contests in economics theory (4).”
BackgroundThe Martyrdom Effect: When Pain and Effort Increase Prosocial Contributions
Olivola, C. Y., & Shafir, E. B. (2011) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.767 · Cited by 246
“Similarly, the more severe the process of initiation into a group, the more the group is subsequently liked (Aronson & Mills, 1959).”
BackgroundDissonance‐based interventions for health behaviour change: A systematic review
Freijy, T. M., & Kothe, E. J. (2013) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12035 · Cited by 167
The Origins of Cognitive Dissonance
Egan, L., Santos, L., & Bloom, P. (2007) · Psychology Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02012.x · Cited by 188
“In line with this suggestion, work on cognitive dissonance in nonhuman animals has exclusivelyemployedvariantsoftheeffort-justificationparadigm(see Aronson & Mills, 1959, for a version of this paradigm with human subjects).”
BackgroundMethodHoly cow!Wait ’til next year! A closer look at the brand loyalty of Chicago Cubs baseball fans
Bristow, D. N., & Sebastian, R. J. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363760110392976 · Cited by 186
“Such a prediction is consistent with severity of initiation effects (i.e. Aronson and Mills, 1959; Gerard and Mathewson, 1966), which suggests that the more a person voluntarily suffers to join a group (or achieve some end), the more positively the individual will evaluate the group or end.”
ResultChanges in interpersonal perception as a means of reducing cognitive dissonance.
Davis, K. E., & JONES, E. E. (1960) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0044214 · Cited by 225
The Drivers of Loyalty Program Success
McCall, M., & Voorhees, C. M. (2009) · Cornell Hospitality Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1938965509355395 · Cited by 197
“A stream of psychology research demonstrates how increased effort (fees, in this case) should lead to more positive associations with the choices made (Aronson and Mills 1959).”
BackgroundInterest and Interests: The Psychology of Constructive Capriciousness
Silvia, P. J. (2001) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.3.270 · Cited by 211
“Conflict is the mechanism that magnifies emotional interest into a long-term project involving increasingly articulated knowledge and expertise.”
BackgroundMethod
Metadata
- Authors
- Aronson, E., & Mills, J.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1959-09
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-181
- ISSN
- 0096-851X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037252822
- Cited by
- 1,297
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 117 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 39.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Keywords
- initiation, group preferences, self-selection, initial motivation, group membership
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
