The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group.
Abstract
IT is a frequent observation that persons who go through a great deal of trouble or pain to attain something tend to value it more highly than persons who attain the same thing with a minimum of effort. For example, one would expect persons who travel a great distance to see a motion picture to be more impressed with it than those who see the same picture at a neighborhood theater. By the same token, individuals who go through a severe initiation to gain admission to a club or organization should tend to think more highly of that organization than those who do not go through the severe initiation to gain admission. Two questions are relevant here: 1. Is this "common observation " valid, that is, does it hold true when tested under cotrolled conditions? 2. If the observation is valid, how can it be accounted for? The relationship might be simply a result of differences in initial motivation. To take the case of initiations, persons who initially have a strong desire to join a particular club should be more willing to undergo unpleasantness to gain admission to it than persons who are low in initial interest. Therefore, a club that requires a severe initiation for admission should be joined only by those people with a strong desire to become members. On the other hand, a club that does not require a severe initiation should be joined by some individuals who like it very much, and by others who are relatively uninterested. Because of this self-selection, one would expect persons who are members of clubs with severe initiations to think more highly of their club, on the average, than members of clubs without severe initiations. But is there something in the initiation itself
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The more painful these shocks were, the more strongly the subjects felt towards the group (Gerard & Mathewson, 1966, see also Aronson & Mills, 1959, Ma, Meng, Wang, & Shen, 2014).”
From Conative Dissonance (2026) · cites this paper as Aronson & Mills, 1959
In the citing paper
“Here, the ritual culture is portrayed in rigid drills that involve synchronous marching, chanting, and other regimented behaviors that ensure order and high levels of motivation (e.g., Aronson & Mills, 1959;King, 2013;McNeill, 1995;Mills & Mintz, 1972).”
From The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework (2018) · cites this paper as Aronson & Mills, 1959
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–864 of 864
Narratives and Rituals of Pleasure
Glucklich, A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108674256.008
Church-Sect Theory and Pleasure
Glucklich, A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108674256.007
The Variety and Mystery of Religious Pleasure
Glucklich, A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108674256.002
Pleasure, Play, and Magical Thinking
Glucklich, A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108674256.006
Zentall, T. (2019) · The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511977244.017
Beyond the Believer-Citizen Dilemma in a Polity: a Membership Approach
Zhao, M., & Fang, W. (2019) · Discourse · doi:10.32603/2412-8562-2019-5-5-88-98
Shkurko, A. (2019) · Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3146-1
“Elliot Aronson and Judson Mills (1959) studied whether the cognitive dissonance created by an initiation process could explain how much commitment students felt to a group that they were part of.”
BackgroundThe Different Roads Not Taken: Considering Dissimilar Alternatives Motivates Goal Persistence.Preprint
Kim, H.-Y., & Urminsky, O. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/taz7m
Group Formation and Other Elementary Group Processes
Brown, P. R., & Pehrson, D. S. (2019) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118719244.ch2
Fritzlen, K. A., Bilal, D., & Olson, M. (2019) · Interacción · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30712-7_12
Persistent Sunk Cost Fallacy in a Real Effort Experiment
Banerjee, P., Chandrasekhar, S., & Srikant, P. (2016) · Studies in Microeconomics · doi:10.1177/2321022219851593
Selection Bias and Endowment Effect
Howard, J. C. (2018) · Cognitive Errors and Diagnostic Mistakes · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93224-8_26
Nesselroade, K. P., Jr., & Grimm, L. G. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119531708.refs
On the mathematics of the free-choice paradigmPreprint
Selinger, P., & Tapp, K. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.06961
“The first effort justification experiment was performed by Aronson and Mills [1].”
MethodHazing: Why we do things we don’t want to do
Wattam, S. (2018) · Psych-Talk · doi:10.53841/bpstalk.2018.1.90.14
Frey, K., & Gregg, A. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9781315101347-4
Pepitone, A. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9781351315326-3
Rouf, K. (2017) · International Journal of Research Studies in Education · doi:10.5861/ijrse.2017.1756
“Aronson and Mills (1959) call this cognitive dissonance bias effort justification bias (Hill & Betz, 2005, p.”
BackgroundLee, S. (2016) · doi:10.5040/9781718225176
Are Low- or High-Effort Self-Control Strategies More Motivating?
Tian, D. (2015) · ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta) · doi:10.7939/r3hm52q96
Mechanisms of conscious and unconscious interpretative processes
Karoui, I. E. (2015) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/5677df3az6a60z4d45zaf16z4dcb5d161ce5
“To test this prediction, Aronson and Mills (1959) asked female college students to participate in group discussions about the psychology of sex.”
BackgroundMethodStudent perceptions of Thai university initiations
Grubbs, S. (2013) · Asia Pacific Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/02188791.2013.787391
“The severity of initiations has been suggested by some to have a positive effect on how much people like the groups that they were initiated into (Aronson & Mills, 1959; Gerard & Mathewson, 1966).”
BackgroundScaillet, N., & Leyens, J. (2012) · Mardaga eBooks · doi:10.3917/mard.leyen.2012.01.0207
Haque, O. S., Shenhav, A., & Rand, D. G. (2011) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2011.647852
Understanding the role of religion's palliative effects, within and between cultures
Randles, D. (2011) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2011.647856
Dole, A., & Eichel, S. K. D. (1981) · Journal of religion and health · doi:10.1007/bf01533285
DECEPTION RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY: A CALL FOR A TEN YEAR MORATORIUM
Zweigenhaft, R. L. (1978) · Peace & Change · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0130.1978.tb00383.x
Opinion conformity as an impression management tactic following performance of an unpleasant task
Riess, M., Forsyth, D., Schlenker, B. R., & Freed, S. (1977) · doi:10.3758/bf03336977
The Process of Organizational Entry
Timperley, S. (1974) · doi:10.1108/eb055266
Student Political Campaigners: Who Campaigns and What Effect Does It Have on Them?
Zanna, M., Darley, J., Chaikin, A. L., & Shafto, M. (1973) · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1973.tb02404.x
Gold, J. A., Ryckman, R., & Rodda, W. C. (1973) · Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.1973.9922622
Ritual in Voluntary Associations
Smith, D. (1972) · doi:10.1177/089976407200100405
Satisfaction in an Academic Setting.
Amir, Y., & Krausz, M. (1971) · doi:10.1080/0013188710130209
An Activation Hypothesis of Cognitive Behavior
Emami, J. (1970) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1970.26.2.575
Kiss, M., & Willemsen, S. (2025) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.5117/9789462985841_ch04
Onboarding for Competitive Performance
Setlhodi, I. (2021) · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-8266-3.ch006
Evolution of the African Standby Force
Onditi, F., Ben-Nun, G., Were, E., & Nyadera, I. N. (2021) · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-70869-6_5
Coleman, B., & Mcdonald, M. M. (2021) · Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_886
Entscheidungen und Beeinflussungen
Kindermann, H. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-28161-8_7
Überblick über das Konzept der Selbsttäuschung
Sachse, R. (2020) · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-61268-2_2
In his own image: an existential evolutionary perspective on the origins and function of religion
Pyszczynski, T., & Landau, M. J. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-817204-9.00022-6 · Cited by 2
(2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108674256.011
Glucklich, A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108674256.010
Kirmayer, L. J., Worthman, C. M., Kitayama, S., Lemelson, R., & Cummings, C. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.029
Kirmayer, L. J., Worthman, C. M., Kitayama, S., Lemelson, R., & Cummings, C. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.001
Glucklich, A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108674256.012
Glucklich, A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108674256.001
Prozesse in Kleingruppen – Intragruppenprozesse
Werth, L., Seibt, B., & Mayer, J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53899-9_3
Abschluss-, Austritts- und Ausstoßriten
Stockkamp, M. (2018) · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-56219-2_30
Explanatory Mechanisms for Group Model Building
Scott, R. (2018) · SpringerBriefs in operations research · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-8959-6_7
Nachwort: Rituale als Chance für uns und die Gesellschaft
Mayr, K., & Frey, D. (2018) · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-56219-2_32
Behavioral Economics, Evolution, and the Human Brain
McKenzie, R. B. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76810-6_4
Students Alternative Scientific Conceptions
Kalman, C. (2018) · Innovation and change in professional education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66140-7_3
Three Modes of Human Aggression, Plus Pure Evil
Scheibe, K. E. (2017) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62986-5_9
Zentall, T. R. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1562-0_2
Medien, Journalismus und öffentliche Meinung
Becker, T. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-06948-3_4 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Aronson, E., & Mills, J.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1959-09
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-181
- ISSN
- 0096-851X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037252822
- Cited by
- 1,297
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 117 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 39.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Keywords
- initiation, group preferences, self-selection, initial motivation, group membership
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
