The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group.
Abstract
IT is a frequent observation that persons who go through a great deal of trouble or pain to attain something tend to value it more highly than persons who attain the same thing with a minimum of effort. For example, one would expect persons who travel a great distance to see a motion picture to be more impressed with it than those who see the same picture at a neighborhood theater. By the same token, individuals who go through a severe initiation to gain admission to a club or organization should tend to think more highly of that organization than those who do not go through the severe initiation to gain admission. Two questions are relevant here: 1. Is this "common observation " valid, that is, does it hold true when tested under cotrolled conditions? 2. If the observation is valid, how can it be accounted for? The relationship might be simply a result of differences in initial motivation. To take the case of initiations, persons who initially have a strong desire to join a particular club should be more willing to undergo unpleasantness to gain admission to it than persons who are low in initial interest. Therefore, a club that requires a severe initiation for admission should be joined only by those people with a strong desire to become members. On the other hand, a club that does not require a severe initiation should be joined by some individuals who like it very much, and by others who are relatively uninterested. Because of this self-selection, one would expect persons who are members of clubs with severe initiations to think more highly of their club, on the average, than members of clubs without severe initiations. But is there something in the initiation itself
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The more painful these shocks were, the more strongly the subjects felt towards the group (Gerard & Mathewson, 1966, see also Aronson & Mills, 1959, Ma, Meng, Wang, & Shen, 2014).”
From Conative Dissonance (2026) · cites this paper as Aronson & Mills, 1959
In the citing paper
“Here, the ritual culture is portrayed in rigid drills that involve synchronous marching, chanting, and other regimented behaviors that ensure order and high levels of motivation (e.g., Aronson & Mills, 1959;King, 2013;McNeill, 1995;Mills & Mintz, 1972).”
From The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework (2018) · cites this paper as Aronson & Mills, 1959
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 864
Communicating cooperative intentions drove the selection of collective ritual in hominins
Kundt, R., & Lang, M. (2023) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2023.2197986 · Cited by 1
“Likewise for the bonding e ff ects of ritual, it has been long held in psychology that forced initiation rites cause people like the group they were initiated into (Aronson & Mills, 1959).”
Kessel, K. V., Ashburner, M., & Risko, E. F. (2023) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218231186609 · Cited by 1
“…similar vein, framing effort investment as a choice (i.e., goal-driven) might lead individuals to perceive it more positively to avoid potential dissonance arising from reporting that you chose to engage in an act that you perceived negatively (Aronson & Mills, 1959; Brehm, 1956; Kim & Song, 2020).”
BackgroundLin, J., Liu, R.-D., Ding, Y., Yang, Y., Jiang, S.-Y., & Ding, Z.-E. (2023) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104816 · Cited by 1
IKEA vs Trophy effect – an experimental comparison
Bühren, C., & Pleßner, M. (2023) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-09-2021-4881 · Cited by 3
The Role of Subjective Expectations for Exhaustion and Recovery: The Sample Case of Work and Leisure
Schüttengruber, V., & Freund, A. M. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221134529 · Cited by 1
Pavlovian processes may produce contrast leading to bias and suboptimal choice
Zentall, T. R. (2022) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/s13420-022-00514-8 · Cited by 2
“Sometimes explained in terms of cognitive dissonance (Aronson & Mills, 1959; Festinger, 1957), the justification of effort effect is found when positive outcomes that follow greater effort are preferred over similar outcomes that follow less effort (Clement et al., 2000).”
BackgroundRemedial Boundary Work and Gatekeeper Centrality in a Virtual Entrepreneur Community
Santana, J. J. (2022) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2021.753329 · Cited by 2
“Honeycutt (2005) observed elite members of the X-Filesaholics discussion forum hazing newcomers in order to increase loyalty to the group (Aronson and Mills 1959).”
BackgroundFink, L. (2021) · Data Base · doi:10.1145/3481629.3481636 · Cited by 1
“For instance, the seminal paper by Aronson and Mills (1959), “The Effect of Severity of Initiation on Liking for a Group,” which provided early evidence for cognitive dissonance theory, is about four pages long, with the Method section starting on the first page.”
BackgroundCapturing Context Is Not Enough
Lemelson, R., & Tucker, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.023 · Cited by 2
Worthman, C. M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.007 · Cited by 3
The Reward of Musical Emotions and Expectations
Gold, B. P., & Zatorre, R. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.021 · Cited by 4
Cities, Psychosis, and Social Defeat
Sayanvala, F., Bornstein, L., Choudhury, S., Shah, J. L., Weinstock, D., & Gold, I. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.025 · Cited by 1
Culture, Mind, and Brain in Human Evolution
Stout, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.005 · Cited by 1
The Neural Mechanisms Underlying Social Norms
Mu, Y., & Gelfand, M. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.015 · Cited by 2
Zentall, T. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xan0000238 · Cited by 1
Wei, Y. I., Mei, S., & Ya, Z. (2019) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2019.01439 · Cited by 1
“…& Chee, 2015; Wallis & Rushworth, 2014)。相对于低努力条件, 高努力 条件导致前扣带回的激活显著增强(Croxson et al., 2009; Hart et al., 2017; Kurniawan, Guitart-Masip, Dayan, & Dolan, 2013; Massar et al., 2015; Prévost, Pessiglione, Météreau, Cléry-Melin, & Dreher, 2010; Vassena et al., 2014), 并且被试对于高努力的预测 同 样 会 激 活 前 扣 带 回…”
Kressel, N. (2019) · Mass Hate · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-6084-9_6 · Cited by 1
Demirutku, K., & AĞAOĞLU, D. (2018) · Ayna Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi · doi:10.31682/ayna.424536 · Cited by 2
Rollwage, M., Pannach, F., Stinson, C. L., Toelch, U., Kagan, I., & Pooresmaeili, A. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/253138 · Cited by 2
“attribution theory (13) and effort justification (14)).”
Capuchin monkeys do not show human-like pricing effects
Catapano, R., Buttrick, N. R., Widness, J., Goldstein, R. S., & Santos, L. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01330 · Cited by 1
“…5 | Article 1330 | 6 to prefer stimuli associated with more cost or effort, regardless of whether such effort comes in the form of extra waiting (e.g., Alessandri et al., 2008a), more difficult work (e.g., Festinger and Carlsmith, 1959), or even more embarrassment (e.g., Aronson and Mills, 1959).”
BackgroundAffective Forecasting: the Effects of Immune Neglect and Surrogation
Burkman, S. D. (2012) · University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · doi:10.12794/metadc149566
“The paradoxical consequence of this is that people sometimes recover faster from truly distressing experiences than from only slightly distressing experiences (Aronson & Mills, 1959; Gerard & Mathewson, 1966; Zimbardo, 1966).”
BackgroundZhang, Z.-L., Zhang, Z.-Q., & Law, R. T. (2012) · doi:10.1353/scp.2012.0010 · Cited by 1
“Comparison between Authors of Manuscripts Accepted without Revision and Authors of Manuscripts Accepted after Revision Previous research supports the notion that groups that have a strenuous entrance requirement are more likely to be viewed favourably.(12) We suspected that authors whose manuscripts were accepted afte…”
BackgroundHarmon‐Jones, E., & Harmon‐Jones, C. (2011) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2011.647853 · Cited by 1
Motivational and neural systems of religion
Johnson, K. A., Ball, B. H., Brewer, G. A., & Cohen, A. B. (2011) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2011.647854
Great minds think alike: Psychology of an effective interrogation
Moskalenko, S. (2011) · doi:10.1080/17467586.2011.611153 · Cited by 1
“…in the lower animals, ‘inadvertently’ contradicted themselves and one another, mumbled several non sequiturs, started sentences that they never finished, hemmed, hawed, and in general conducted one of the most worthless and uninteresting discussions imaginable’’ (Aronson & Mills, 1956, p. 179).”
BackgroundInterpersonal determinants of attitude change following counterattitudinal behavior
von der Gruen, W. O., & Forsyth, D. (1996) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf02686947 · Cited by 1
Factors Affecting Adults' Attitudes toward School Desegregation
Kimble, C. (1980) · doi:10.1080/00224545.1980.9924248 · Cited by 1
THE RELATION BETWEEN THE PROCESS OF ATTITUDE CHANGE AND THE DEGREE OF ANXIETY
Haraoka, K. (1974) · THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY · doi:10.2130/jjesp.14.56 · Cited by 1
EFFECTS OF INSUFFICIENT JUSTIFICATION UPON THE AROUSAL OF COGNITIVE DISSONANCE
Takata, T., & Hashimoto, H. (1973) · doi:10.2130/jjesp.13.77 · Cited by 1
Denmark, F., & Guttentag, M. (1966) · Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.1966.9919714 · Cited by 1
A critique of experimental design in communication research
Nebergall, R. E. (1965) · doi:10.1080/10510976509362765 · Cited by 1
Physical discomfort predicts parochial altruism during Pope Francis’s funeral
Xygalatas, D., Hernu, M., & White, C. (2025) · Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100251 · Cited by 2
Quinn, J. F. (2021) · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56592-3_7 · Cited by 1
Combat Exposure and Mental Health in the Military: the Role of Collective Identity
Bouleh, P. (2020) · doi:10.15760/honors.902 · Cited by 2
“It is very well possible that combat exposure could promote collective military identification due to the psychological, social, and physical costs that accompany the trauma of combat (Aronson & Mills, 1959).”
Background강, 찬., Choi, K.-E., & Kang, H. (2020) · doi:10.5392/jkca.2020.20.02.203 · Cited by 1
Infrequent Use of AI-Enabled Personal Assistants Through the Lens of Cognitive Dissonance Theory
O’Brien, N., & Sohail, M. (2020) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60700-5_44 · Cited by 6
Eliciting Expert Practitioner Knowledge Through Pedagogy and Infographics
Campbell, R. H. (2019) · Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_136 · Cited by 1
Collective rituals promote cohesion: Based on action, emotion, and memory
Xiao-yan, Z., Ke-li, Y., & Lü, L. T. (2018) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2018.00939 · Cited by 3
Wheatland, F. T. (2017) · doi:10.25911/5d70edcbacd3e · Cited by 1
Cognitive Dissonance and Aging
Cooper, J., & Perez-Hooks, Y. D. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-287-080-3_317-1 · Cited by 1
Hazing in Fraternities and Sororities
Nuwer, H. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.64092-8 · Cited by 1
Why is Religion Characterized by Excess and Non-Functionality?
Schjoedt, U. (2013) · Method & Theory in the Study of Religion · doi:10.1163/15700682-12341309 · Cited by 1
Deliberate Self-Persuasion and Forgiveness
Cheung, I. (2012) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e512142015-539 · Cited by 1
“For example, in a classic study demonstrating cognitive dissonance (Aronson & Mills, 1959), individuals volunteered to be part of a discussion group and endured either a mild or severe initiation.”
BackgroundThe Evolution of Our Preferences
Lakshminarayanan, V. R., & Santos, L. R. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-381431-9.00004-8 · Cited by 3
“In addition, making participants work harder on a disliked task leads them to evaluate that task as more enjoyable (e.g., Aronson & Mills, 1959).”
BackgroundNanay, B. (2026) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.70258
Participating in the Common Good of the Firm
Sison, A., & Fontrodona, J. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1684-4
Kirmayer, L. J., Worthman, C. M., & Kitayama, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.002 · Cited by 6
Tsukamoto, M., & Kohara, K. (2017) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-017-0253-0
Cognitive dissonance as an effect of watching Amator
van der Pol, G. (2013) · New Review of Film and Television Studies · doi:10.1080/17400309.2012.750067
“It is not the dissonant information so much as the effort justification – the tendency to attribute a greater value (greater than the objective value) to an outcome one had to put effort into acquiring or achieving – that determines the level of dissonance, researchers say (Aronson and Mills 1959).”
BackgroundChen, J. C., Tam, T., & Chiang, Y.-S. (2019) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-018-2011-3 · Cited by 4
Magic and ritual as affiliative strategies in response to ostracism threat
Jagiello, R., & Whitehouse, H. (2026) · Evolution and human behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2026.106985
Santopetro, N. J., Simon, J. R., Brush, C. J., Mulligan, E. M., Ryan, J., & Hajcak, G. (2026) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-026-01507-0
Exploring the Role of Physical Effort in the Rewarding Value of Sedentary Behavior
Maltagliati, S., ten Broeke, P., Sarrazin, P., Rhodes, R. E., Bijleveld, E., Dunton, G. F., Bonnet, C., Gardner, B., Raichlen, D. A., Miller, M. W., et al. (2026) · Peer Community Journal · doi:10.24072/pcjournal.820
Model similarity cues cultural selection of ritualized actions
Jagiello, R., & Whitehouse, H. (2026) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2026.2721297
Roh, K. H., Lee, Y. H., Melhuish, K., & Austin, C. (2026) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-026-10565-7
A nonlinear reward after-effect of cognitive effort expenditure.
Liu, L., Xue, L.-K., Tang, R.-M., & Zheng, Y. (2026) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.122221
Does AI-assisted labor change how earnings are spent?
Zong, J.-R., & Lyu, Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1877013
Omnichannel AI experience and engagement intentions: validation of a multidimensional scale
Wu, H.-C., Hameed, W., Chen, Y.-C., Hapsari, R., & Hussein, A. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-026-10069-w
“Drawing on a commitment–justification perspective (Aronson & Mills, 1959; Westermann, 2000 ), higher evaluation cost reflects greater consumer investment in terms of time and cognitive effort.”
COGNITIVE DISSONANCE: AN ANALYTICAL REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPT, CAUSES AND EFFECTS
Konwar, J., & Tok, B. R. (2026) · International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research in Arts, Science and Technology · doi:10.59828/ijmrast.v4i8.295
“Study conducted by Aronson and Mills (1959) revealed that individuals who experience greater difficulty in achieving something often develop more positive evaluations of the outcome.”
Jung, H., & Albarracín, D. (2026) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2026.44.4.401
Baumard, J. (2026) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2026.109581
Integrated treatment for addiction and personality disorders: principles and method
Hest, K. V., Florissen, S., Rekom, M. M. V., Visser, M., & Boog, M. (2026) · Advances in Dual Diagnosis: Policy, practice and research in mental health and substance use · doi:10.1108/add-04-2025-0025
Czap, H., Miteza, I., & Czap, N. V. (2026) · Review of Behavioral Economics · doi:10.1108/rbe-09-2025-0083
Cognitive dissonance in cybersecurity – a review and research agenda
van Schaik, P., & Renaud, K. (2026) · Information & Computer Security · doi:10.1108/ics-12-2025-0509
Pulling up the ladder: Enduring adversity increases opposition to reform
Kim, M., Gneezy, A., & Imas, A. (2026) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag128
“Because ad-versity is unpleasant, people may feel compelled to find meaning in their challenges by incorporating the process into the achievement ’ s value (22 – 24).”
An information-theoretic account of cognitive effort
Zhang, M. (2026) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2026.2671371
(Alston), C. I. H. (2026) · Tourism Recreation Resarch · doi:10.1080/02508281.2026.2640402
Çoksan, S., Tercan, M., Bagci, S., & Yıldız-Çoksan, S. (2026) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.70052
“Finally, the fact that these effects on social closeness were more pronounced in the enhanced condition powerfully underscores the role of self-engagement and symbolic investment (Aronson & Mills, 1959).”
Concise Introduction to Social Psychology
Baumeister, R. F. (2026) · doi:10.4337/9781035315468
Lawless, W. F. (2026) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2025.1715888
“Effort justification [92] is the missing key to linking cognition interdependently to physical reality, but only with difficulty or hard work, as exemplified by Einstein’s struggle to generalize his special theory of relativity to include acceleration and gravity [41].”
Does Hypocrisy Trigger a Higher Cost of Debt? Evidence from China
Du, X., Yu, R., Zeng, Q., Zhang, Y.-Q., & Zhang, Y.-K. (2025) · The British Accounting Review · doi:10.1016/j.bar.2025.101818
The psychological mechanism of self deception: multidimensional analysis and boundary definition
Xiao, H. (2025) · Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research · doi:10.56028/aehssr.15.1.396.2025
“In Aronson and Mills ’ (1959) experiment, participants were assigned to a discussion group that was intentionally made dull.”
Horne, S. J., & Quigley, L. (2025) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjc.70007
Rai, B. S., T., M. K., & N., V. (2025) · International Journal of Philosophy and Languages (IJPL) · doi:10.47992/ijpl.2583.9934.0041
Sinemus, K., Zielke, S., & Dobbelstein, T. (2025) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-05-2024-0214
Porphyry, bishop of Gaza: a psychobiographical study of faith, leadership, and spiritual authority
Alkhouri, K. I. (2025) · Culture and Religion · doi:10.1080/14755610.2026.2619188
“The magnitude of his transformation reflects the principle of effort justification (Aronson and Mills 1959), where the hardships endured in his new life paradoxically strengthened his commitment, while his later campaigns against paganism served to reinforce his revised worldview (Festinger,…”
Affirming the arctic outdoors: reading norrland ranger memoirs of becoming through outdoor training
Mangold, M. (2024) · Critical Military Studies · doi:10.1080/23337486.2024.2368358
“This possibly reflects an attempt to reduce the dissonance from the unpleasant experiences of those efforts, making entering the group more attractive (see Aronson and Judson 1959).”
InfluentialGarcía, J. E. (2023) · Revista de Psicologia · doi:10.36901/psicologia.v12i2.1561
Cimino, A., Pollock, J., & Thomas, B. J. (2023) · Evolution and human behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2023.09.003
Pendulum or Progress? Tax Consultants in the Crisis of Legitimacy
Ötsch, S. (2022) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642221144831
“…appropriate tend to relativize or devalue criticism or to justify responsibility with reference to their own lack of decision-making competence, room for maneuver, or a coercive situation (also Aronson & Mills, 1959; Festinger, 2012; for the development of the theory Irle & Möntmann, 2020).”
Jones, J. G., McClanahan, A., & Sery, J. (2022) · Persuasion in Society · doi:10.4324/9781003107651-4
Meaning and willingness to pay: the role of expectation disconfirmation
Assadi, P., & Assadi, P. (2021) · Journal of economic and administrative sciences · doi:10.1108/jeas-04-2021-0069
Gender Differences in Athletic and Academic Cultures on a University Campus
Sellers, K. M., Yancey, G. B., & Kowalski, K. C. (2021) · Journal of Higher Education Athletics & Innovation · doi:10.15763/issn.2376-5267.2020.1.7.89-122
“Research has shown that increased task difficulty can induce participants to rate the task as more valuable, meaningful, and interesting (Aronson & Mills, 1959; Gerard & to be more regimented, demanding, and stressful (Jolly, 2007; Lu et al., 2012).”
BackgroundEnhanced preference for delayed rewards requires the basolateral amygdala and retrosplenial cortexPreprint
Lefner, M. J., Magnon, A. P., Gutierrez, J. M., Lopez, M. R., & Wanat, M. J. (2021) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.01.14.426754
Ciocan, T., & Gramann, P. (2020) · Proceedings of DIALOGO-CONF 2020 · doi:10.18638/dialogo.2020.7.1.7
Pelham, B. W., & Boninger, D. (2020) · Introductory Psychology in Modules · doi:10.4324/9780367816360-13
Literary Analysis and Weak Theories
Moses, O. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.022
Experience-Dependent Plasticity in the Hippocampus
West, G. L., & Bohbot, V. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.019
Kirmayer, L. J., Worthman, C. M., Kitayama, S., Lemelson, R., & Cummings, C. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.008
How Social Coordination and Cooperation are Achieved
Kirmayer, L. J., Worthman, C. M., Kitayama, S., Lemelson, R., & Cummings, C. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.013
The Co-emergence of Culture, Mind, and Brain
Kirmayer, L. J., Worthman, C. M., Kitayama, S., Lemelson, R., & Cummings, C. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.004
(2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.017
The Cultural Brain as Historical Artifact
Boddice, R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.018 · Cited by 6
Liminal Brains in Uncertain Futures
Choudhury, S., & Berson, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.020 · Cited by 1
Philo’s Mastery, Plotinus’s Play, and the Mystic’s Joy
Glucklich, A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108674256.005
The Nature and Cultivation of Complex Pleasure
Glucklich, A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108674256.003
The Discovery of Mastery Pleasure
Glucklich, A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108674256.004
A Scholar’s Shabbat in Central Virginia
Glucklich, A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108674256.009
Metadata
- Authors
- Aronson, E., & Mills, J.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1959-09
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-181
- ISSN
- 0096-851X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037252822
- Cited by
- 1,297
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 117 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 39.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Keywords
- initiation, group preferences, self-selection, initial motivation, group membership
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review