Cited by 14Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The Chinese version of the 8-item committed action questionnaire (ChCAQ-8): A preliminary analysis of the factorial and criterion validity

Open access
Wong, Wing-sze, McCracken, Lance, Wong, Steven, Chen, Phoon-ping, Chow, Yu-fat, Fielding, Richard·2016·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

Committed action is a key component of the psychological flexibility model that recently has been applied in chronic pain settings. Developed within the Western context, the 8-item Committed Action Questionnaire (CAQ-8) demonstrated good psychometric properties. This study aimed to translate the original English version of the CAQ-8 into Chinese (ChCAQ-8) and to assess its reliability, factor structure and concurrent criterion validity. A total of 210 Chinese patients with chronic pain completed the ChCAQ-8, the Chronic Pain Grade, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Results of confirmatory factor analysis showed both the 2-factor correlated (CFI = .99) and hierarchical (CFI = .98) models met the minimum acceptable fit criterion. The 2 subscales and the entire scale of ChCAQ-8 demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's αs ranging .70-.86). The ChCAQ-8 negative subscale score was significantly correlated with pain intensity, disability, pain catastrophizing, and depression in the expected direction. The ChCAQ-8 positive subscale was significantly correlated with pain castastrophizing and depression. Results of multivariate regression modeling showed the ChCAQ-8 negative subscale predicted depression (std β = .19, p < .01) and disability (std β = .14, p < .05), after adjusting for pain intensity, pain duration and pain catastrophizing. Our findings offer preliminary data for the reliability, factorial and concurrent criterion validity of the ChCAQ-8 in the Chinese population. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pas0000187

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wong, W.-S., McCracken, L., Wong, S., Chen, P.-P., Chow, Y.-F., & Fielding, R.
Affiliations
  • Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital (GB)
  • Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital (CN)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2016-06
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
e111-e118
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W1803093187
Cited by
14
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
committed action, psychological flexibility, chronic pain, Chinese translation, cross-cultural adaptation, factor structure, criterion validity, pain catastrophizing, depression, pain-related disability, pain intensity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Psychometrics, Translating, Reproducibility of Results, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review