Cited by 274Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentPain Management and Placebo Effect

Catastrophizing and internal pain control as mediators of outcome in the multidisciplinary treatment of chronic low back pain

Open access
Spinhoven, Philip, ter Kuile, Moniek, Kole‐Snijders, Ank M.J, Mansfeld, Menno Hutten, den Ouden, Dirk‐Jan, Vlaeyen, Johan W.S·2004·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine (a) whether a cognitive-behavioral treatment (differentially) affects pain coping and cognition; and (b) whether changes in pain coping and cognition during treatment mediate treatment outcome. Participants in this randomized clinical trial were 148 patients with chronic low back pain attending a multidisciplinary treatment program consisting of operant-behavioral treatment plus cognitive coping skills training (N = 59) or group discussion (N = 58) or allocated to a waiting list control condition (N = 31). Patients improved with respect to level of depression, pain behavior and activity tolerance at posttreatment and 12-month follow-up. Treatment also resulted in a short- and long-term decrease in catastrophizing and an enhancement of internal pain control. Changes in catastrophizing and to a lesser degree in internal pain control mediated the reduction in level of depression and pain behavior following treatment. The use of behavioral and cognitive interventions aimed at decreasing catastrophizing thoughts about the consequences of pain and promoting internal expectations of pain control possibly constitute an important avenue of change irrespective of the type of treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.08.003

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relatively few treatment outcome studies have undertaken to measure and analyse possible mediators or change processes in chronic pain trials.

    “In fact, relatively few treatment outcome studies have undertaken to measure and analyse possible mediators 50, 51, 57 or changes processes 4-6, 19, 20, 45, 46 in chronic pain trials.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spinhoven, P., ter Kuile, M., Kole‐Snijders, A. M. J., Mansfeld, M. H., den Ouden, D., & Vlaeyen, J. W. S.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
Corresponding author
Spinhoven, Philip
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-06
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
211-219
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W1988974431
Cited by
274
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 20
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
chronic low back pain, catastrophizing, pain coping, cognitive behavioral therapy, multidisciplinary pain management, mediation, depression, pain behavior, activity tolerance, coping skills training
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Chronic Disease, Cognition, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Low Back Pain, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review