Cited by 71Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorFace Recognition and PerceptionSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Facing humanness: facial width-to-height ratio predicts ascriptions of humanity.

Open access
Deska, Jason C., Lloyd, E. Paige, Hugenberg, Kurt·2018·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

(see record 2017-57724-002). In the article, there is a data error in the Results section of Study 1c. The fourth sentence of the fourth paragraph should read as follows: High fWHR targets (M= 74.39, SD=18.25) were rated as equivalently evolved as their low fWHR counterparts (M=79.39, SD=15.91).] The ascription of mind to others is central to social cognition. Most research on the ascription of mind has focused on motivated, top-down processes. The current work provides novel evidence that facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) serves as a bottom-up perceptual signal of humanness. Using a range of well-validated operational definitions of humanness, we provide evidence across 5 studies that target faces with relatively greater fWHR are seen as less than fully human compared with their relatively lower fWHR counterparts. We then present 2 ancillary studies exploring whether the fWHR-to-humanness link is mediated by previously established fWHR-trait links in the literature. Finally, 3 additional studies extend this fWHR-humanness link beyond measurements of humanness, demonstrating that the fWHR-humanness link has consequences for downstream social judgments including the sorts of crimes people are perceived to be guilty of and the social tasks for which they seem helpful. In short, we provide evidence for the hypothesis that individuals with relatively greater facial width-to-height ratio are routinely denied sophisticated, humanlike minds. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pspi0000110

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Living adult males with relatively narrower faces tend both to be less reactively aggressive and to be perceived as being less aggressive, to the point of being assessed as having more human-like minds.

    “In support of the behavioral significance of recent anatomical changes, living adult males with relatively narrower faces tend both to be less reactively aggressive and to be perceived as being less aggressive (Carré and McCormick, 2008; Haselhuhn et al., 2015), to the point of being assessed as having more human-like minds (Deska et al., 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deska, J. C., Lloyd, E. P., & Hugenberg, K.
Affiliations
Miami University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2018-01
Volume
114
Issue
1
Pages
75-94
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2746239055
Cited by
71
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
FWCI
7.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks Open (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (BCS-1423765)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
facial width-to-height ratio, humanness, facial appearance, social cognition, perceived guilt, perceived helpfulness
MeSH terms
Facial Recognition, Adult, Face, Female, Humans, Male, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review