Cited by 176Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentHealth disparities and outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emerging into adulthood in the face of racial discrimination: Physiological, psychological, and sociopolitical consequences for african american youth.

Open access
Hope, Elan C., Hoggard, Lori S., Thomas, Alvin·2015·Translational Issues in Psychological Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/tps0000041

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Hope, E. C., Hoggard, L. S., & Thomas, A.
Venue
Translational Issues in Psychological Science
Published
2015-12
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
342-351
ISSN
  • 2332-2136 (ISSN-L)
  • 2332-2179
OpenAlex
W2613925480
Cited by
175
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
22.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Translational Issues in Psychological Science (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Science Foundation (537597)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
racial discrimination, emerging adulthood, African American youth, physiological stress response, psychological impact

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review