Cited by 16Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorPsychology of Social InfluenceChild and Animal Learning Development

Social influence shifts valuation of appetitive cues in early adolescence and adulthood.

Open access
Martin, Rebecca E., Villanueva, Yvette, Stephano, Theodore, Franz, Peter J., Ochsner, Kevin N.·2018·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

Other people can profoundly affect one's opinions and decisions. In the current study, we compared the effects of peer influence on responses to a primary reward-food-in both young adolescents and adults. Food is critical for survival, and in addition to its rewarding properties, habits and practices surrounding eating are heavily influenced by social and cultural norms. To address the impact of peer influence on food valuations, young adolescents ages 10-14 and young adults ages 18-22 rated the desirability of foods before and after seeing peer opinions about those foods. We then compared the degree to which participants changed their ratings of food desirability as a function of the type of social information received (e.g., peers liking a food more or less than did the participant). We found that all participants' ratings conformed to the peer ratings and that adolescents had less stable valuations across all conditions over time. These results provide evidence for the effectiveness of peer influence in shifting valuations of appetitive stimuli and can inform interventions aimed at improving healthy eating choices. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/xge0000469

Cites

75 of 76 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Over-reliance on digital tools for information storage, such as search engines, was associated with reduced intrinsic memory and impaired autobiographical recall.

    “On the other hand, over-reliance on digital tools for information storage, such as search engines was associated with reduced intrinsic memory and impaired autobiographical recall [12, 13].”

    From Cognitive benefits and risks of digital technology engagement (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Method (Procedure) describes peer-influence measures, and the Discussion concerns responses to food cues; neither addresses memory effects of digital tools. Searches for search engines, information storage, intrinsic memory, and autobiographical recall found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Asch SE 1952 Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments Groups, leadership and men; research in human relations 177 190 Oxford, England Carnegie Press
  2. Campbell-Meiklejohn D Frith CD 2012 Chapter 8 - Social Factors and Preference Change Dolan R Sharot T Neuroscience of Preference and Choice 177 206 San Diego Academic Press Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123814319000085
  3. Spielberger CD Edwards CD 1973 STAIC preliminary manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (“ How I feel questionnaire”) Consulting Psychologists Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, R. E., Villanueva, Y., Stephano, T., Franz, P. J., & Ochsner, K. N.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
2018-10
Volume
147
Issue
10
Pages
1521-1530
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2894882548
Cited by
16
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01 HD069178; R01 AG043463, F31 NIMH 107119)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
peer influence, social influence, food valuation, food desirability, appetitive cues, early adolescence, early adulthood, conformity, dietary habits, social norms, healthy eating interventions
MeSH terms
Peer Influence, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Child, Cues, Female, Food, Humans, Male, Reward, Social Behavior, Social Conformity, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review