Cited by 81Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

The μ‐opioid receptor agonist morphine, but not agonists at δ‐ or κ‐opioid receptors, induces peripheral antinociception mediated by cannabinoid receptors

Open access
Da Fonseca Pacheco, D, Klein, A, De Castro Perez, A, Da Fonseca Pacheco, C M, De Francischi, J N, Duarte, I D G·2008·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

Background and purpose: Although participation of opioids in antinociception induced by cannabinoids has been documented, there is little information regarding the participation of cannabinoids in the antinociceptive mechanisms of opioids. The aim of the present study was to determine whether endocannabinoids could be involved in peripheral antinociception induced by activation of μ‐, δ‐ and κ‐opioid receptors. Experimental approach: Nociceptive thresholds to mechanical stimulation of rat paws treated with intraplantar prostaglandin E 2 (PGE 2 , 2 μg) to induce hyperalgesia were measured 3 h after injection using an algesimetric apparatus. Opioid agonists morphine (200 μg), (+)‐4‐[(alphaR)‐alpha‐((2S,5R)‐4‐Allyl‐2,5‐dimethyl‐1‐piperazinyl)‐3‐ methoxybenzyl]‐ N , N ‐diethylbenzamide (SNC80) (80 μg), bremazocine (50 μg); cannabinoid receptor antagonists N ‐(piperidin‐1‐yl)‐5‐(4‐ iodophenyl)‐1‐(2,4‐dichlorophenyl)‐4‐methyl‐1 H ‐pyrazole‐3‐carboxamide (AM251) (20–80 μg), 6‐iodo‐2‐methyl‐1‐[2‐(4‐morpholinyl) ethyl]‐1 H ‐indol‐3‐yl(4‐methoxyphenyl) methanone (AM630) (12.5–100 μg); and an inhibitor of methyl arachidonyl fluorophosphonate (MAFP) (1–4 μg) were also injected in the paw. Key results: The CB 1 ‐selective cannabinoid receptor antagonist AM251 completely reversed the peripheral antinociception induced by morphine in a dose‐dependent manner. In contrast, the CB 2 ‐selective cannabinoid receptor antagonist AM630 elicited partial antagonism of this effect. In addition, the administration of the fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor, MAFP, enhanced the antinociception induced by morphine. The cannabinoid receptor antagonists AM251 and AM630 did not modify the antinociceptive effect of SNC80 or bremazocine. The antagonists alone did not cause any hyperalgesic or antinociceptive effect. Conclusions and implications: Our results provide evidence for the involvement of endocannabinoids, in the peripheral antinociception induced by the μ‐opioid receptor agonist morphine. The release of cannabinoids appears not to be involved in the peripheral antinociceptive effect induced by κ‐ and δ‐opioid receptor agonists. British Journal of Pharmacology (2008) 154 , 1143–1149; doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.175 ; published online 12 May 2008

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/bjp.2008.175

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Da Fonseca Pacheco, D., Klein, A., De Castro Perez, A., Da Fonseca Pacheco, C. M., De Francischi, J. N., & Duarte, I. D. G.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Corresponding author
Duarte, I D G
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07
Volume
154
Issue
5
Pages
1143-1149
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W2029908981
Cited by
81
References
59
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
morphine, mu-opioid receptor, delta opioid receptor, kappa opioid receptor, cannabinoid receptors, peripheral antinociception, endocannabinoids, CB1 receptor, CB2 receptor, AM251, AM630, fatty acid amide hydrolase, opioid-cannabinoid interaction
MeSH terms
Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolases, Amidohydrolases, Analgesics, Opioid, Animals, Arachidonic Acids, Benzamides, Benzomorphans, Disease Models, Animal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Enzyme Inhibitors, Hyperalgesia, Indoles, Male, Morphine, Pain, Pain Measurement, Piperazines, Piperidines, Pyrazoles, Dinoprostone, Rats, Wistar, Receptors, Opioid, mu, Receptors, Opioid, delta, Receptors, Opioid, kappa, Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1, Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2, Rats, Organophosphonates, Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review