Cited by 391Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsIon Channels and Receptors

CB2 cannabinoid receptor-mediated peripheral antinociception

Malan, Philip T., Ibrahim, Mohab M., Deng, Hongfeng, Liu, Qian, Mata, Heriberto P., Vanderah, Todd, Porreca, Frank, Makriyannis, Alexandros·2001·Pain

Abstract

Cannabinoid receptor agonists diminish responses to painful stimuli. Extensive evidence implicates the CB(1) receptor in the production of antinociception. However, the capacity of CB(2) receptors, which are located outside the central nervous system (CNS), to produce antinociception is not known. Using AM1241, a CB(2) receptor-selective agonist, we demonstrate that CB(2) receptors produce antinociception to thermal stimuli. Injection of AM1241 in the hindpaw produced antinociception to a stimulus applied to the same paw. Injection of an equivalent dose of AM1241 into the paw contralateral to the side of testing did not. The antinociceptive actions of AM1241 were blocked by the CB(2) receptor-selective antagonist AM630, but not by the CB(1) receptor-selective antagonist AM251. AM1241 also produced antinociception when injected systemically (intraperitoneally). The antinociceptive actions of systemic AM1241 were blocked by injection of AM630 into the paw where the thermal stimulus was applied, but not the contralateral paw. These findings demonstrate the local, peripheral nature of CB(2) cannabinoid antinociception. AM1241 did not produce the CNS cannabinoid effects of hypothermia, catalepsy, inhibition of activity or impaired ambulation, while this tetrad of effects was produced by the mixed CB(1)/CB(2) receptor agonist WIN55,212-2. Peripheral antinociception without CNS effects is consistent with the peripheral distribution of CB(2) receptors. CB(2) receptor agonists may have promise clinically for the treatment of pain without CNS cannabinoid side effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00321-9

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malan, P. T., Ibrahim, M. M., Deng, H., Liu, Q., Mata, H. P., Vanderah, T., Porreca, F., & Makriyannis, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Malan, Philip T.
Venue
Pain
Published
2001-09
Volume
93
Issue
3
Pages
239-245
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070535004
Cited by
391
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k01da000283-04)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 11823, DA 00283, R01DA011823)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
Keywords
CB2 receptor, peripheral antinociception, AM1241, AM630, thermal pain, CB1 receptor, WIN 55,212-2, cannabinoid receptor agonists, pain management
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Animals, Cannabinoids, Indoles, Male, Morpholines, Naphthalenes, Pain Measurement, Piperidines, Pyrazoles, Receptors, Drug, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Peripheral Nervous System, Receptors, Cannabinoid, Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2, Benzoxazines, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review