Cited by 96Nutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorMental Health Treatment and Access

Fruit and vegetable consumption and prevalence and incidence of depressive symptoms in mid-age women results from the Australian longitudinal study on women’s health

Mihrshahi, S, Dobson, A J, Mishra, G D·2015·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background/objectives There is continued interest in the associations between diet and depression and several studies have focused on individual dietary factors or diet patterns to investigate the relationship. We investigated the association between fruit and vegetables and symptoms of depression in the mid-age cohort of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health.Subjects/methods A total of 6271 women with a mean age of 55.45 (1.45 s.d.) years were followed up at three surveys over 6 years. A score of ⩾ 10 on the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression-10 scale indicated depressive symptoms. Fruit and vegetable intake was assessed using short questions.Results A total of 381 women (6.1%) were depressed at all three surveys over the 6-year survey period. Cross-sectional logistic regression analysis using general estimating equations showed a reduced odds of depressive symptoms (odds ratio (OR) 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-0.95, P=0.001)) among women who ate ⩾ 2 of fruit/day even after adjustment for several factors including smoking, alcohol, body mass index, physical activity, marital status, education, energy, fish intake and comorbidities. The predictive model also showed a reduced odds of depressive symptoms (OR 0.82 (95% CI 0.70-0.96, P=0.012)) among women who ate ⩾ 2 pieces of fruit/day. There was also an association between vegetable intake and prevalence of depressive symptoms at higher levels of intake.Conclusions Increasing fruit consumption may be one important factor for reducing both the prevalence and incidence of depressive symptoms in mid-age women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ejcn.2014.222

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mihrshahi, S., Dobson, A. J., & Mishra, G. D.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Mishra, G D
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2014-10-29
Volume
69
Issue
5
Pages
585-591
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W2037487148
Cited by
96
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5
FWCI
5.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
fruit consumption, vegetable consumption, depressive symptoms, middle-aged women, diet and depression, depression incidence, depression prevalence, Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health
MeSH terms
Aging, Alcohol Drinking, Australia, Depression, Feeding Behavior, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Fruit, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk Factors, Smoking, Vegetables, Women, Body Mass Index, Incidence, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Marital Status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review