The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre
Open accessAbstract
In eukaryotes transcriptional regulation often involves multiple long-range elements and is influenced by the genomic environment. A prime example of this concerns the mouse X-inactivation centre (Xic), which orchestrates the initiation of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) by controlling the expression of the non-protein-coding Xist transcript. The extent of Xic sequences required for the proper regulation of Xist remains unknown. Here we use chromosome conformation capture carbon-copy (5C) and super-resolution microscopy to analyse the spatial organization of a 4.5-megabases (Mb) region including Xist. We discover a series of discrete 200-kilobase to 1 Mb topologically associating domains (TADs), present both before and after cell differentiation and on the active and inactive X. TADs align with, but do not rely on, several domain-wide features of the epigenome, such as H3K27me3 or H3K9me2 blocks and lamina-associated domains. TADs also align with coordinately regulated gene clusters. Disruption of a TAD boundary causes ectopic chromosomal contacts and long-range transcriptional misregulation. The Xist/Tsix sense/antisense unit illustrates how TADs enable the spatial segregation of oppositely regulated chromosomal neighbourhoods, with the respective promoters of Xist and Tsix lying in adjacent TADs, each containing their known positive regulators. We identify a novel distal regulatory region of Tsix within its TAD, which produces a long intervening RNA, Linx. In addition to uncovering a new principle of cis-regulatory architecture of mammalian chromosomes, our study sets the stage for the full genetic dissection of the X-inactivation centre.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Consistent with prior studies16, we found that genes in the same domain correlate across samples, but that genes separated by a boundary show lower correlation (Fig. 1e).”
From Insulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas (2016) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Consistent with prior studies16, we found that genes in the same domain correlate across samples, but that genes separated by a boundary show lower correlation (Fig. 1e).”
From Insulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas (2016) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“metazoan genomes are organised into megabase-scale segregated domains that are often invariant between cell types, termed topologically associating domains (TADs) [432–434].”
From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [433]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Second, it was demonstrated that eukaryotic chromosomes are partitioned into so-called topologically associated domains (TADs) [35,36,37], which appear to restrict the areas of enhancer action [38,39,40,41].”
From Enhancer Function in the 3D Genome (2023) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“Indeed, the genome is now known to be hierarchically organized in a series of 3D structures, starting from nucleosome clutches, to chromatin loops, to chromosomal domains called topologically associating domains (TADs), and finally to active or repressive compartments and chromosome territories 15,46,[48][49][50] .”
From Advances in epigenetics link genetics to the environment and disease (2019) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“These changes enable proceeding through the 3C protocol in a single tube per sample, allow handling of over 20 samples in parallel, reduce the amount of cells needed by a factor 5 to 10 and cut down the time needed to complete the protocol from 8 days (Nora et al. 2012) to 4 days.”
From Targeted Degradation of CTCF Decouples Local Insulation of Chromosome Domains from Genomic Compartmentalization (2017) · cites this paper as Nora et al. 2012
In the citing paper
“loop extrusion mediated by cohesin and CTCF mediates the formation of chromatin loops and self-interacting Topologically Associating Domains (TADs)”
From Neuronal DNA double-strand breaks lead to genome structural variations and 3D genome disruption in neurodegeneration (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
In the citing paper
“Mammalian genomes are organized into a hierarchy of Megabase (Mb)-scale topologically associating domains (TADs) (Dixon et al., 2012; Nora et al., 2012) and smaller, nested subTADs (Dixon et al., 2012; Nora et al., 2012; Phillips-Cremins et al., 2013; Rao et al., 2014).”
From Disease-Associated Short Tandem Repeats Co-localize with Chromatin Domain Boundaries (2018) · cites this paper as Nora et al., 2012
In the citing paper
“Consistent with previous reports, we found enrichment for the architectural protein CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) at human ES cell boundaries compared to loci internal to domains (Figure S6A-B) (Dixon et al., 2012; Nora et al., 2012; Phillips-Cremins et al., 2013).”
From Disease-Associated Short Tandem Repeats Co-localize with Chromatin Domain Boundaries (2018) · cites this paper as Nora et al., 2012
In the citing paper
“The deposition of chromatin marks is thought to contribute to this process (Dixon et al., 2015, Nora et al., 2012)”
From Multiscale 3D Genome Rewiring during Mouse Neural Development (2017) · cites this paper as Nora et al., 2012
In the citing paper
“At intermediate scales (100 kb to 1 Mb), a major discovery is the existence of topologically associating domains (TADs) (Dixon et al., 2012, Nora et al., 2012, Sexton et al., 2012).”
From Multiscale 3D Genome Rewiring during Mouse Neural Development (2017) · cites this paper as Nora et al., 2012
In the citing paper
“Recent chromosome conformation studies have revealed that mammalian chromosomes are structured into largely tissue-invariant TADs in which the DNA interactions are more frequent within a given domain than with regions in other domains4,5.”
From Disruption of chromatin folding domains by somatic genomic rearrangements in human cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“The disruption of domain boundaries can result in ectopic interactions between neighboring domains and affect the regulation of nearby genes5,9.”
From Disruption of chromatin folding domains by somatic genomic rearrangements in human cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“TADs were identified through Hi-C3,4 and their existence have since been confirmed by alternative methods such as intrinsic 3C (i3C),18 which avoids the cross-linking step and Genome Architecture Mapping (GAM),19 which avoids the ligation step.”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“First, chromatin is organized into Topological Associating Domains (TADs) that are characterized by preferential contacts between loci inside the same TAD and insulation from loci in adjacent TADs.3,4”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“A large body of evidence suggests that TADs correspond to functional regulatory domains by primarily restricting contact between enhancers and promoters to occur within the same TAD3,21–25”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Accordingly, deletion of a boundary between two TADs causes ectopic contacts between previously insulated loci3 and can cause aberrant gene expression through improper enhancer-promoter contact.27,28”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“suggesting an important functional role of CTCF and cohesin in TAD formation and maintenance (Fig. 2A).”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Both DNA FISH3,9,36–39 and single-cell Hi-C40,41 studies show that genome organization is highly variable between cells and that even strong Hi-C loop anchors only contact in a small subset of cells”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“After TADs were discovered through Hi-C studies, it quickly became clear that TAD boundaries are near universally enriched in CTCF and cohesin ChIP-Seq peaks,3,4,16”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“The CTCF/cohesin anchored loop domain matching the Hi-C corner-peak actually only exists in a small subset of cells, which is also consistent with the high levels of cell-to-cell variability in contact probability observed in DNA FISH studies.3,9,36–39”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, individual chromosomes are partitioned into megabase- sized topologically associating domains (TADs), regions with relatively high intradomain DNA interaction frequencies as measured by Hi-C chromosome conformation capture data (Dixon et al., 2012; Nora et al., 2012).”
From Insulated Neighborhoods: Structural and Functional Units of Mammalian Gene Control (2016) · cites this paper as Nora et al., 2012
In the citing paper
“Nonetheless, the TADs identified by processing Hi-C data with the Hidden Markov algorithm (Dixon et al., 2012; Nora et al., 2012) can also be identified when this algorithm is used to process cohesin ChIA-PET data (Ji et al., 2016).”
From Insulated Neighborhoods: Structural and Functional Units of Mammalian Gene Control (2016) · cites this paper as Nora et al., 2012
In the citing paper
“genome-wide, high-resolution understanding of chromosome cell-cycle dynamics11 is still limited by current technologies”
From Cell-cycle dynamics of chromosomal organization at single-cell resolution (2017) · cites this paper as [4]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comprehensive Mapping of Long-Range Interactions Reveals Folding Principles of the Human Genome
Lieberman-Aiden, E., van Berkum, N. L., Williams, L., Imakaev, M., Ragoczy, T., Telling, A., Amit, I., Lajoie, B. R., Sabo, P. J., Dorschner, M. O., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1181369 · Cited by 8,898
Self-citationTopological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions
Dixon, J. R., Selvaraj, S., Yue, F., Kim, A., Li, Y., Shen, Y., Hu, M., Liu, J. S., & Ren, B. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11082 · Cited by 6,829
Chromatin signature reveals over a thousand highly conserved large non-coding RNAs in mammals
Guttman, M., Amit, I., Garber, M., French, C., Lin, M. F., Feldser, D., Huarte, M., Zuk, O., Carey, B. W., Cassady, J. P., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07672 · Cited by 4,098
Khalil, A. M., Guttman, M., Huarte, M., Garber, M., Raj, A., Rivea Morales, D., Thomas, K., Presser, A., Bernstein, B. E., van Oudenaarden, A., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0904715106 · Cited by 2,872
Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome
Sexton, T., Yaffe, E., Kenigsberg, E., Bantignies, F., Leblanc, B., Hoichman, M., Parrinello, H., Tanay, A., & Cavalli, G. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.010 · Cited by 1,983
Mediator and cohesin connect gene expression and chromatin architecture
Kagey, M. H., Newman, J. J., Bilodeau, S., Zhan, Y., Orlando, D. A., van Berkum, N. L., Ebmeier, C. C., Goossens, J., Rahl, P. B., Levine, S. S., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09380 · Cited by 1,939
Self-citationDostie, J., Richmond, T., Arnaout, R., Selzer, R. R., Lee, W. L., Honan, T., Rubio, E. D., Krumm, A., Lamb, J., Nusbaum, C., et al. (2006) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.5571506 · Cited by 1,237
Self-citationMolecular Maps of the Reorganization of Genome-Nuclear Lamina Interactions during Differentiation
Peric-Hupkes, D., Meuleman, W., Pagie, L., Bruggeman, S. W. M., Solovei, I., Brugman, W., Gräf, S., Flicek, P., Kerkhoven, R. M., van Lohuizen, M., et al. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.03.016 · Cited by 1,050
Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells
Hawkins, R. D., Hon, G. C., Lee, L. K., Ngo, Q., Lister, R., Pelizzola, M., Edsall, L. E., Kuan, S., Luu, Y., Klugman, S., et al. (2010) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2010.03.018 · Cited by 806
The Human Transcriptome Map: Clustering of Highly Expressed Genes in Chromosomal Domains
Caron, H. N., van Schaik, B. D. C., van der Mee, M., Baas, F., Riggins, G. J., Sluis, P. V., Hermus, M.-C., van Asperen, R., Boon, K., Voûte, P. A., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1056794 · Cited by 730
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,010
Bastié, N., Chapard, C., Dauban, L., Gadal, O., Beckouët, F., & Koszul, R. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00780-0 · Cited by 70
Gdula, M. R., Poterlowicz, K., Mardaryev, A. N., Sharov, A. A., Peng, Y., Fessing, M. Y., & Botchkarev, V. A. (2013) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2013.66 · Cited by 71
Three-Dimensional Genome Organization and Function in Drosophila
Schwartz, Y. B., & Cavalli, G. (2017) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.115.185132 · Cited by 77
Distal Limb Patterning Requires Modulation of cis-Regulatory Activities by HOX13
Sheth, R., Barozzi, I., Langlais, D., Osterwalder, M., Nemec, S., Carlson, H. L., Stadler, H. S., Visel, A., Drouin, J., & Kmita, M. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.039 · Cited by 72
Haddad, N., Jost, D., & Vaillant, C. (2017) · Chromosome Research · doi:10.1007/s10577-016-9548-2 · Cited by 75
Hamm, D. C., & Harrison, M. M. (2018) · Open Biology · doi:10.1098/rsob.180183 · Cited by 78
Order and disorder: abnormal 3D chromatin organization in human disease
Anania, C., & Lupiáñez, D. G. (2019) · Briefings in Functional Genomics · doi:10.1093/bfgp/elz028 · Cited by 74
Franke, M., de la Calle‐Mustienes, E., Neto, A., Almuedo‐Castillo, M., Irastorza-Azcárate, I., Acemel, R. D., Tena, J. J., Santos-Pereira, J. M., & Gómez-Skármeta, J. L. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25604-5 · Cited by 71
Richart, L., Picod-Chedotel, M.-L., Wassef, M. A., Macario, M., Aflaki, S., Salvador, M. A., Héry, T., Dauphin, A., Wicinski, J., Chevrier, V., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.034 · Cited by 69
Gayathiri, E., Prakash, P., Kumaravel, P., Jayaprakash, J., Ragunathan, M. G., Sankar, S., Pandiaraj, S., Thirumalaivasan, N., Thiruvengadam, M., & Rajakumar, G. (2023) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2023.08.002 · Cited by 72
Chang, L., Xie, Y., Taylor, B., Wang, Z., Sun, J., Armand, E. J., Mishra, S. V., Xu, J., Tastemel, M., Lie, A., et al. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-024-02447-1 · Cited by 72
Genetic Tailors: CTCF and Cohesin Shape the Genome During Evolution
Rudan, M. V., & Hadjur, S. (2015) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2015.09.004 · Cited by 70
Signaling by Steroid Hormones in the 3D Nuclear Space
Dily, F. L., & Beato, M. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19020306 · Cited by 76
Bian, Q., Anderson, E. C., Yang, Q., & Meyer, B. J. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2002068117 · Cited by 71
Mammalian DNA Replication TimingPreprint
Vouzas, A. E., & Gilbert, D. M. (2021) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a040162 · Cited by 71
Comparison of the Hi-C, GAM and SPRITE methods using polymer models of chromatin
Fiorillo, L., Musella, F., Conte, M., Kempfer, R., Chiariello, A. M., Bianco, S., Kukalev, A., Irastorza-Azcárate, I., Esposito, A., Abraham, A., et al. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01135-1 · Cited by 73
Mechanisms and proteins involved in long-distance interactions
Maksimenko, O. G., & Georgiev, P. G. (2014) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2014.00028 · Cited by 68
MLL1 Inhibition Reprograms Epiblast Stem Cells to Naive Pluripotency
Zhang, H., Gayen, S., Xiong, J., Zhou, B. O., Shanmugam, A. K., Sun, Y., Karataş, H., Liu, L., Rao, R. C., Wang, S., et al. (2016) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2016.02.004 · Cited by 75
Integrating Hi-C and FISH data for modeling of the 3D organization of chromosomes
Abbas, A., He, X., Niu, J., Zhou, B., Zhu, G., Ma, T., Song, J., Gao, J. T., Zhang, M. Q., & Zeng, J. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10005-6 · Cited by 69
Hormone-control regions mediate steroid receptor–dependent genome organizationPreprint
Dily, F. L., Vidal, E., Cuartero, Y., Quilez, J., Nacht, A. S., Vicent, G. P., Carbonell‐Caballero, J., Sharma, P., Villanueva‐Cañas, J. L., Ferrari, R., et al. (2018) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.243824.118 · Cited by 70
Okhovat, M., VanCampen, J., Nevonen, K. A., Harshman, L., Li, W., Layman, C. E., Ward, S., Herrera, J., Wells, J., Sheng, R. R., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43841-8 · Cited by 68
Nonlinear control of transcription through enhancer-promoter interactions
Zuin, J., Roth, G., Zhan, Y., Cramard, J., Redolfi, J., Piskadlo, E., Mach, P., Kryzhanovska, M., Tihanyi, G., Kohler, H., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.04.22.440891 · Cited by 67
Self-citationTranscriptional control of a whole chromosome: emerging models for dosage compensation
Ferrari, F., Alekseyenko, A. A., Park, P. J., & Kuroda, M. I. (2014) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2763 · Cited by 68
How the Genome Folds: The Biophysics of Four-Dimensional Chromatin Organization
Parmar, J. J., Woringer, M., & Zimmer, C. (2019) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-052118-115638 · Cited by 74
Chromatin Architecture in the Fly: Living without CTCF/Cohesin Loop Extrusion?
Matthews, N. E., & White, R. A. (2019) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201900048 · Cited by 67
High-resolution structural genomics reveals new therapeutic vulnerabilities in glioblastomaPreprint
Johnston, M. J. G., Nikolić, A., Ninkovic, N., Guilhamon, P., Cavalli, F. M. G., Seaman, S., Zemp, F. J., Lee, J., Abdelkareem, A. O., Ellestad, K. I., et al. (2019) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.246520.118 · Cited by 68
A Dynamic Role of TBX3 in the Pluripotency Circuitry
Russell, R., Ilg, M., Lin, Q., Wu, G., Lechel, A., Bergmann, W., Eiseler, T., Linta, L., Kumar P., P., Klingenstein, M., et al. (2015) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.11.003 · Cited by 66
The mole genome reveals regulatory rearrangements associated with adaptive intersexuality
M. Real, F., Haas, S. A., Franchini, P., Xiong, P., Simakov, O., Kuhl, H., Schöpflin, R., Heller, D., Moeinzadeh, M.-H., Heinrich, V., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz2582 · Cited by 66
CTCF as a regulator of alternative splicing: new tricks for an old player
Alharbi, A. B., Schmitz, U., Bailey, C. G., & Rasko, J. E. J. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab520 · Cited by 68
Kumar, S., Kaur, S., Seem, K., Kumar, S., & Mohapatra, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.774719 · Cited by 70
Oberbeckmann, E., Quililan, K., Cramer, P., & Oudelaar, A. M. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-023-01649-8 · Cited by 70
Chetverina, D., Fujioka, M., Erokhin, M., Georgiev, P. G., Jaynes, J. B., & Schedl, P. D. (2017) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201600233 · Cited by 66
Gene regulation in the 3D genome
Li, Y., Hu, M., & Shen, Y. (2018) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddy164 · Cited by 71
Three-dimensional chromatin in disease: What holds us together and what drives us apart?
Ibrahim, D. M., & Mundlos, S. (2020) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2020.01.003 · Cited by 70
A TAD Skeptic: Is 3D Genome Topology Conserved?
Eres, I. E., & Gilad, Y. (2020) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2020.10.009 · Cited by 69
Chen, L.-F., Long, H. K., Park, M., Swigut, T., Boettiger, A. N., & Wysocka, J. (2023) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2023.03.009 · Cited by 66
An isochore framework underlies chromatin architecture
Jabbari, K., & Bernardi, G. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168023 · Cited by 66
Structure, function and evolution of topologically associating domains (TADs) atHOX loci
Lonfat, N., & Duboule, D. (2015) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2015.04.024 · Cited by 69
Froberg, J. E., Pinter, S. F., Kriz, A. J., Jégu, T., & Lee, J. T. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07446-w · Cited by 68
Is euchromatin really open in the cell?
Maeshima, K., Iida, S., Shimazoe, M. A., Tamura, S., & Ide, S. (2023) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2023.05.007 · Cited by 66
Epigenetic Control of Cytokine Gene Expression
Falvo, J. V., Jasenosky, L. D., Kruidenier, L., & Goldfeld, A. E. (2013) · Advances in immunology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407708-9.00002-9 · Cited by 69
The role of chromatin insulators in nuclear architecture and genome function
Bortle, K. V., & Corces, V. G. (2013) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2012.11.003 · Cited by 67
Yang, J., Sung, E., Donlin-Asp, P., & Corces, V. G. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2469 · Cited by 66
Yang, R., Kerschner, J. L., Gosalia, N., Neems, D. S., Gorsic, L. K., Safi, A., Crawford, G. E., Kosak, S. T., Leir, S., & Harris, A. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1358 · Cited by 65
Inferential Structure Determination of Chromosomes from Single-Cell Hi-C Data
Carstens, S., Nilges, M., & Habeck, M. (2016) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005292 · Cited by 66
Architectural alterations of the fission yeast genome during the cell cycle
Tanizawa, H., Kim, K.-D., Iwasaki, O., & Noma, K.-I. (2017) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.3482 · Cited by 69
Matthews, B. J., & Waxman, D. J. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.34077 · Cited by 66
The interdependence of gene-regulatory elements and the 3D genome
Vermunt, M. W., Zhang, D., & Blobel, G. A. (2018) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201809040 · Cited by 72
Du, Q., Smith, G. C., Luu, P., Ferguson, J. M., Armstrong, N. J., Caldon, C. E., Campbell, E. M., Nair, S. S., Zotenko, E., Gould, C. M., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109722 · Cited by 66
Epigenetics reloaded: the single-cell revolution
Bheda, P., & Schneider, R. (2014) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2014.08.010 · Cited by 65
Tsujimura, T., Klein, F. A., Langenfeld, K., Glaser, J., Huber, W. K., & Spitz, F. (2015) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004897 · Cited by 64
From 1D sequence to 3D chromatin dynamics and cellular functions: a phase separation perspective
Liu, S., Zhang, L., Quan, H., Tian, H., Meng, L., Yang, L., Feng, H., & Gao, Y. Q. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky633 · Cited by 66
Reprogramming: identifying the mechanisms that safeguard cell identity
Brumbaugh, J., Stefano, B. D., & Hochedlinger, K. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.182170 · Cited by 66
Tracing DNA paths and RNA profiles in cultured cells and tissues with ORCA
Mateo, L. J., Sinnott-Armstrong, N., & Boettiger, A. N. (2021) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-020-00478-x · Cited by 65
Jeppsson, K., Sakata, T., Nakato, R., Milanova, S., Shirahige, K., & Björkegren, C. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abn7063 · Cited by 59
Structural insights into p300 regulation and acetylation-dependent genome organisation
Ibrahim, Z., Wang, T., Destaing, O., Salvi, N., Hoghoughi, N., Chabert, C., Rusu, A., Gao, J., Feletto, L., Reynoird, N., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35375-2 · Cited by 64
Helper T Cell Plasticity: Impact of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Signals on Transcriptomes and Epigenomes
Bonelli, M. M., Shih, H., Hirahara, K., Singelton, K., Laurence, A. D. J., Poholek, A. C., Hand, T., Mikami, Y., Vahedi, G., Kanno, Y., et al. (2014) · Current topics in microbiology and immunology · doi:10.1007/82_2014_371 · Cited by 66
An Integrative Breakage Model of genome architecture, reshuffling and evolution
Farré, M., Robinson, T. J., & Ruiz‐Herrera, A. (2015) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201400174 · Cited by 70
Briand, N., & Collas, P. (2018) · Nucleus · doi:10.1080/19491034.2018.1449498 · Cited by 65
Xist RNA antagonizes the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeler BRG1 on the inactive X chromosome
Jégu, T., Blum, R., Cochrane, J. C., Yang, L., Wang, C., Gilles, M.-E., Colognori, D., Szántó, A., Marr, S. K., Kingston, R. E., et al. (2019) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-018-0176-8 · Cited by 64
Lamina-Dependent Stretching and Unconventional Chromosome Compartments in Early C. elegans Embryos
Sawh, A. N., Shafer, M. E. R., Su, J.-H., Zhuang, X., Wang, S., & Mango, S. E. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.02.006 · Cited by 65
Gu, B., Comerci, C. J., McCarthy, D. G., Saurabh, S., Moerner, W. E., & Wysocka, J. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.10.001 · Cited by 66
Dileep, V., Rivera‐Mulia, J. C., Sima, J., & Gilbert, D. M. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.2015.80.027284 · Cited by 70
Weak interactions in higher-order chromatin organization
Kantidze, O. L., & Razin, S. V. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa261 · Cited by 64
When TADs go bad: Chromatin structure and nuclear organisation in human disease
Kaiser, V. B., & Semple, C. A. (2017) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.10792.1 · Cited by 64
Order and stochasticity in the folding of individual Drosophila genomes
Ulianov, S. V., Zakharova, V. V., Galitsyna, A. A., Kos, P. I., Polovnikov, K. E., Flyamer, I. M., Mikhaleva, E. A., Khrameeva, E. E., Germini, D., Logacheva, M. D., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20292-z · Cited by 64
HOX gene cluster (de)regulation in brain: from neurodevelopment to malignant glial tumours
Gonçalves, C. S., Boiteux, E. L., Arnaúd, P., & Costa, B. M. (2020) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-020-03508-9 · Cited by 63
Cresswell, K. G., Stansfield, J. C., & Dozmorov, M. G. (2020) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-020-03652-w · Cited by 64
Zuo, W., Chen, G., Gao, Z., Li, S., Chen, Y., Huang, C., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Lei, M., & Bian, Q. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26033-0 · Cited by 63
Zhang, S., Plummer, D., Lu, L., Cui, J., Xu, W., Wang, M., Liu, X., Prabhakar, N., Shrinet, J., Srinivasan, D., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01116-w · Cited by 63
Chromosome domain architecture and dynamic organization of the fission yeast genome
Mizuguchi, T., Barrowman, J., & Grewal, S. I. S. (2015) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2015.06.008 · Cited by 69
Chromosomal domains: epigenetic contexts and functional implications of genomic compartmentalization
Tanay, A., & Cavalli, G. (2013) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2012.12.009 · Cited by 63
Fadason, T., Schierding, W. S., Lumley, T., & O'Sullivan, J. M. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07692-y · Cited by 65
Galupa, R., Nora, E. P., Worsley-Hunt, R., Picard, C., Gard, C., van Bemmel, J. G., Servant, N., Zhan, Y., Marjou, F. E., Johanneau, C., et al. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.10.030 · Cited by 71
Self-citationJiang, Q., Ang, J. Y. J., Lee, A. Y., Cao, Q., Li, K. Y., Yip, K. Y.-L., & Leung, D. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108315 · Cited by 64
Three-dimensional folding dynamics of the Xenopus tropicalis genome
Niu, L., Shen, W., Shi, Z., Tan, Y., He, N., Wan, J., Sun, J., Zhang, Y., Huang, Y., Wang, W., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00878-z · Cited by 63
A high‐throughput method to identify trans‐activation domains within transcription factor sequences
Arnold, C. D., Nemčko, F., Woodfin, A. R., Wienerroither, S., Vlasova, A. V., Schleiffer, A., Pagani, M., Rath, M., & Stark, A. (2018) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201798896 · Cited by 65
The multiple facets of the SMC1A gene
Musio, A. (2020) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2020.144612 · Cited by 62
An integrated view of the structure and function of the human 4D nucleome
Dekker, J., Oksuz, B. A., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Minsk, M. K., Kuang, S., Yang, L., Gibcus, J. H., Krietenstein, N., Rando, O. J., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09890-3 · Cited by 64
Self-citationStructural Fluctuations of the Chromatin Fiber within Topologically Associating Domains
Tiana, G., Amitai, A., Pollex, T., Piolot, T., Holcman, D., Heard, É., & Giorgetti, L. (2016) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2016.02.003 · Cited by 62
Self-citationCell cycle– and genomic distance–dependent dynamics of a discrete chromosomal region
Ma, H., Tu, L., Chung, Y.-C., Naseri, A., Grünwald, D., Zhang, S., & Pederson, T. (2019) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201807162 · Cited by 64
Disruption of nuclear speckles reduces chromatin interactions in active compartments
Hu, S., Lv, P., Yan, Z., & Wen, B. (2019) · Epigenetics & Chromatin · doi:10.1186/s13072-019-0289-2 · Cited by 60
Du, M., Yuan, T., Schilter, K. F., Dittmar, R. L., Mackinnon, A. C., Huang, X., Tschannen, M., Worthey, E. A., Jacob, H. J., Xia, S., et al. (2014) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddu426 · Cited by 64
Analysis of the relationship between coexpression domains and chromatin 3D organization
Soler-Oliva, M. E., Guerrero-Martinez, J. A., Bachetti, V., & Reyes, J. C. (2017) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005708 · Cited by 61
Ahmed, M., Soares, F., Xia, J.-H., Yang, Y., Li, J., Guo, H.-Y., Su, P.-R., Tian, Y.-J., Lee, H., Wang, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21867-0 · Cited by 58
Vos, E. S. M., Valdes‐Quezada, C., Huang, Y., Allahyar, A., Verstegen, M. J. A. M., Felder, A.-K., van der Vegt, F., Uijttewaal, E. C. H., Krijger, P. H. L., & de Laat, W. L. (2021) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.06.008 · Cited by 61
BRD2 compartmentalizes the accessible genome
Xie, L., Dong, P., Qi, Y., Hsieh, T.-H. S., English, B. P., Jung, S., Chen, X., Marzio, M. D., Casellas, R. C., Chang, H. Y., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01044-9 · Cited by 66
Essential role of Cp190 in physical and regulatory boundary formation
Kaushal, A., Dorier, J., Wang, B., Mohana, G., Taschner, M., Cousin, P., Waridel, P., Iseli, C., Semenova, A., Restrepo, S., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl8834 · Cited by 64
Lin, D., Xu, W., Hong, P., Wu, C., Zhang, Z., Zhang, S., Xing, L., Yang, B., Zhou, W., Xiao, Q., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33558-5 · Cited by 61
Multiple Enhancers Regulate Hoxd Genes and the Hotdog LncRNA during Cecum Budding
Delpretti, S., Montavon, T., Leleu, M., Joye, E., Tzika, A. C., Milinkovitch, M. C., & Duboule, D. (2013) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.09.002 · Cited by 61
Spatial confinement is a major determinant of the folding landscape of human chromosomes
Gürsoy, G., Xu, Y., Kenter, A. L., & Liang, J. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku462 · Cited by 61
Niskanen, H., Tuszyńska, I., Zaborowski, R., Heinäniemi, M., Ylä‐Herttuala, S., Wilczyński, B., & Kaikkonen, M. U. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1214 · Cited by 63
LDB1 establishes multi-enhancer networks to regulate gene expression
Aboreden, N. G., Lam, J. C., Goel, V. Y., Wang, S., Wang, X., Midla, S. C., Quijano, A., Keller, C. A., Giardine, B. M., Hardison, R. C., et al. (2025) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2024.11.037 · Cited by 61
Tark‐Dame, M., Jerabek, H., Manders, E. M. M., Heermann, D. W., & DRIEL, R. V. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003877 · Cited by 60
Stefano, M. D., Stadhouders, R., Farabella, I., Castillo, D., Serra, F., Graf, T., & Martí-Renom, M. A. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16396-1 · Cited by 63
Chang, L., Ghosh, S., Papale, A., Luppino, J. M., Miranda, M., Piras, V., Degrouard, J., Edouard, J., Poncelet, M., Lecouvreur, N., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41265-y · Cited by 63
Different flavors of X-chromosome inactivation in mammals
Dupont, C., & Gribnau, J. H. (2013) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2013.03.001 · Cited by 60
Self-citationFOXO 3 longevity interactome on chromosome 6
Donlon, T. A., Morris, B. J., Chen, R., Masaki, K., Allsopp, R., Willcox, D. C., Elliott, A., & Willcox, B. J. (2017) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/acel.12625 · Cited by 60
RAG Chromatin Scanning During V(D)J Recombination and Chromatin Loop Extrusion are Related Processes
Lin, S. G., Ba, Z., Alt, F. W., & Zhang, Y. (2018) · Advances in immunology · doi:10.1016/bs.ai.2018.07.001 · Cited by 62
The regulatory landscapes of developmental genes
Bolt, C. C., & Duboule, D. (2020) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.171736 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Nora, E. P., Lajoie, B. R., Schulz, E. G., Giorgetti, L., Okamoto, I., Servant, N., Piolot, T., van Berkum, N. L., Meisig, J., Sedat, J., Gribnau, J., Barillot, E., Blüthgen, N., Dekker, J., & Heard, E.
- Affiliations
- Institut Curie (FR)
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Inserm (FR)
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Dekker, Job
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2012-04-11
- Volume
- 485
- Issue
- 7398
- Pages
- 381-385
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC3555144
- OpenAlex
- W2161212572
- Cited by
- 2,895
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 145 · 2025: 168 · 2024: 181 · 2023: 213 · 2022: 241 · 2021: 276 · 2020: 255 · 2019: 300 · 2018: 247 · 2017: 241 · 2016: 201 · 2015: 173 · 2014: 112 · 2013: 103 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 50.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- W. M. Keck Foundation
- European Commission (257082, 242129)
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-INBS-0009)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- National Institutes of Health
- National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG003143)
- FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (250367)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Keywords
- X inactivation center, XIST, Tsix, topologically associating domains, 3D genome organization, long-range transcriptional regulation, X chromosome inactivation, chromatin interactions, embryonic stem cells, cell differentiation, lamina-associated domains, distal regulatory regions
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Differentiation, Female, Fibroblasts, Gene Expression Regulation, Histones, Male, Methylation, Molecular Sequence Data, Promoter Regions, Genetic, X Chromosome, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, DNA, Intergenic, RNA, Untranslated, Epigenesis, Genetic, X Chromosome Inactivation, Mice, Embryonic Stem Cells, Epigenomics, Transcriptome, RNA, Long Noncoding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
